Abstract
Introduction: Infections in urologic prosthetic surgery are complex complications for patients and surgeons.
Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify all studies related to infections in penile prosthetic and artificial urinary sphincter surgery.
Results: Significant improvements have been made in urologic prostheses to decrease rates of infection and prompt recognition with proper management is imperative.
Conclusions: Infections are decreasing in penile prosthetic surgery with advances in technology and surgical techniques. Modifiable risk factors should be evaluated and addressed whenever possible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mobley DF. Early history of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a view from someone who was there. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:225–9.
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–2.
Hatzimouratidis K, et al. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol. 2010;57:804–14.
Montague DK, et al. Chapter 1: the management of erectile dysfunction: an AUA update. J Urol. 2005;174:230–9.
Vakalopoulos I, et al. High patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prostheses implantation correlates with female partner satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2774–81.
Carson CC. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15(Suppl 5):S139–46.
Serefoglu EC, et al. Long-term revision rate due to infection in hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prostheses: 11-year follow-up. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2182–6.
Wilson SK, Costerton JW. Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: a review. J Sex Med. 2012;9:44–53.
Abouassaly R, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure. J Urol. 2006;176:2471–3.
Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM. Penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res. 2001;13:326–8.
Goetz A, Yu VL, O’Donnell WF. Surgical complications related to insertion of penile prostheses with emphasis on infection and cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:250–4.
Chason J, Sausville J, Kramer AC. Penile prosthesis implantation compares favorably in malpractice outcomes to other common urological procedures: findings from a malpractice insurance database. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2111–4.
Sunaryo PL, Colaco M, Terlecki R. Penile prostheses and the litigious patient: a legal database review. J Sex Med. 2014;11:2589–94.
Hellstrom WJG, et al. Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:501–23.
Selph JP, Carson CC 3rd. Penile prosthesis infection: approaches to prevention and treatment. Urol Clin North Am. 2011;38:227–35.
Mulcahy JJ. Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol. 2000;163:481–2.
Mulcahy JJ. Penile prosthesis infection: progress in prevention and treatment. Curr Urol Rep. 2010;11:400–4.
Muench PJ. Infections versus penile implants: the war on bugs. J Urol. 2013;189:1631–7.
Blum MD. Infections of genitourinary prostheses. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 1989;3:259–74.
Mulcahy JJ. Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2010;2:69–75.
Henry GD, et al. Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study. J Urol. 2004;172:153–6.
von Eiff C, Heilmann C, Peters G. New aspects in the molecular basis of polymer-associated infections due to staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect. 1999;18:843–6.
Welliver RCJ, Hanerhoff BL, Henry GD, Kohler TS. Significance of biofilm for the prosthetic surgeon. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15(411):411.
Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Speziale P, Montanaro L, Costerton JW. Biofilm formation in staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. Biomaterials. 2012;33:5967–82.
Cakan M, Demirel F, Karabacak O, Yalcinkaya F, Altug U. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35:209–13.
Gross MS, et al. The malleable implant salvage technique: infection outcomes after Mulcahy salvage procedure and replacement of infected inflatable penile prosthesis with malleable prosthesis. J Urol. 2016;195:694–7.
Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol. 1995;153:659–61.
Minervini A, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures. BJU Int. 2006;97:129–33.
Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol. 1996;156:402–4.
Bishop JR, et al. Use of glycosylated hemoglobin to identify diabetics at high risk for penile periprosthetic infections. J Urol. 1992;147:386–8.
Diokno AC, Sonda LP. Compatibility of genitourinary prostheses and intermittent self-catheterization. J Urol. 1981;125:659–60.
Dietzen CJ, Lloyd LK. Complications of intracavernous injections and penile prostheses in spinal cord injured men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:652–5.
Balen A, Gross MS, Phillips EA, Henry GD, Munarriz R. Active polysubstance abuse concurrent with surgery as a possible newly identified infection risk factor in inflatable penile prosthesis placement based on a retrospective analysis of health and socioeconomic factors. J Sex Med. 2016;13:697–701.
Sidi AA, Peng W, Sanseau C, Lange PH. Penile prosthesis surgery in the treatment of impotence in the immunosuppressed man. J Urol. 1987;137:681–2.
Guild GN, Moore TJ, Barnes W, Hermann C. CD4 count is associated with postoperative infection in patients with orthopaedic trauma who are HIV positive. Clin Orthop. 2012;470:1507–12.
Kavoussi NL, et al. Are urine cultures necessary prior to urologic prosthetic surgery? Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:157–61.
Kavoussi NL, et al. Preoperative urine culture results correlate poorly with bacteriology of urologic prosthetic device infections. J Sex Med. 2017;14:163–8.
Habous M, et al. Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection. BJU Int. 2018;121:293–300.
Bode LGM, et al. Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:9–17.
Webster J, Osborne S. Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD004985. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004985.pub5.
Tanner J, Norrie P, Melen K. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD004122. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004122.pub4.
Grober ED, Domes T, Fanipour M, Copp JE. Preoperative hair removal on the male genitalia: clippers vs. razors. J Sex Med. 2013;10:589–94.
Sexual Medicine Society of North America. Razors and preoperative preparation of the male genitalia. SMSNA - Position Statements. http://www.smsna.org/V1/about/position-statements.
Wolf JSJ, et al. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179:1379–90.
Gross MS, et al. Multicenter investigation of the micro-organisms involved in penile prosthesis infection: an analysis of the efficacy of the AUA and EAU guidelines for penile prosthesis prophylaxis. J Sex Med. 2017;14:455–63.
Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg. 2005;189:395–404.
Parienti JJ, et al. Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized equivalence study. JAMA. 2002;288:722–7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. 2017. CDC Guideline Library. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/ssi/index.html.
Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD003087. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2.
Greif R, Akca O, Horn EP, Kurz A, Sessler DI. Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:161–7.
Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of wound infection and temperature group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1209–15.
Darouiche RO, et al. North American consensus document on infection of penile prostheses. Urology. 2013;82:937–42.
Yeung LL, Grewal S, Bullock A, Lai HH, Brandes SB. A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2013;189:136–40.
Darouiche RO, et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:18–26.
Mandava SH, Serefoglu EC, Freier MT, Wilson SK, Hellstrom WJG. Infection retardant coated inflatable penile prostheses decrease the incidence of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012;188:1855–60.
Eid JF. No-touch technique. J Sex Med. 2011;8:5–8.
Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and ‘no touch’ surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79:1310–5.
Garber BB, Marcus SM. Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection? Urology. 1998;52:291–3.
Sahni NR, Dalton M, Cutler DM, Birkmeyer JD, Chandra A. Surgeon specialization and operative mortality in United States: retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3571.
Henry GD, et al. Centers of excellence concept and penile prostheses: an outcome analysis. J Urol. 2009;181:1264–8.
Henry GD. The Henry mummy wrap and the Henry finger sweep surgical techniques. J Sex Med. 2009;6:619–22.
Sadeghi-Nejad H, et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:535–8.
Henry GD, et al. Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: a multicenter study. J Urol. 2005;173:89–92.
Habous M, et al. Conservative therapy is an effective option in patients with localized infection after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2016;13:972–6.
Brant MD, Ludlow JK, Mulcahy JJ. The prosthesis salvage operation: immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1996;155:155–7.
Zargaroff S, et al. National trends in the treatment of penile prosthesis infections by explantation alone vs. immediate salvage and reimplantation. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1078–85.
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1974;112:75–80.
Pederzoli F, et al. Analysis of hospital readmissions after prosthetic urologic surgery in the United States: nationally representative estimates of causes, costs, and predictive factors. J Sex Med. 2017;14:1059–65.
Marks JL, Light JK. Management of urinary incontinence after prostatectomy with the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1989;142:302–4.
Gundian JC, Barrett DM, Parulkar BG. Mayo Clinic experience with use of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1989;142:1459–61.
Bordenave M, et al. Long-term results of the treatment of urinary incontinence with bulbar implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in men: a single-center experience. Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol. 2011;21:277–82.
Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology. 2000;55:2–4.
Ostrowski I, et al. Multicentre experience with ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. Urologia. 2017;84:148–52.
Llorens C, Pottek T. Urinary artificial sphincter ZSI 375 for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men: 5 and 7 years follow-up report. Urologia. 2017;84:263–6.
Miller AR, Linder BJ, Rangel LJ, Yang DY, Elliott DS. The impact of incontinence etiology on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58:241–6.
Husch T, et al. Antibiotic coating of the artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800): is it worthwhile? Urology. 2017;103:179–84.
Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS, Butler EB, Boone TB. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol. 2007;177:1021–5.
Kim SP, et al. Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol. 2008;179:1912–6.
Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL, Webster GD. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2005;173:1242–5.
Sacomani CAR, et al. Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol. 2018;44:114–20.
Linder BJ, de Cogain M, Elliott DS. Long-term device outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infection. J Urol. 2014;191:734–8.
Serag H, Bang S, Almallah YZ. Artificial urinary sphincters for treating postprostatectomy incontinence: a contemporary experience from the UK. Res Rep Urol. 2018;10:63–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reinstatler, L., Munarriz, R.M., Gross, M.S. (2020). Prevention of Prosthetic Infection: Penile Implants and Artificial Urinary Sphincters. In: Martins, F.E., Kulkarni, S.B., Köhler, T.S. (eds) Textbook of Male Genitourethral Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21446-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21447-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)