Skip to main content

The Truth of Proof: A Hegelian Perspective on Constructivism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 270 Accesses

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 44))

Abstract

In the constructivist movement, which started with Brouwer’s attack on the principles of classical logic and mathematics, the history of mathematics seems to repeat itself in a specific, self-conscious way. The main objective of this paper is to describe this approach by adopting the phenomenological method of Hegel. Its starting point consists in looking at knowledge as a continuous, yet painful, process—the Calvary of the Spirit—with its stations corresponding to the naive, direct concepts of experience as based on sense certainty or belief in the independent realms of objects and their transformation into more sophisticated, socially charged theories. The signs of this advance are the patterns of self-consciousness, such as Cantor’s diagonal results, adopted by constructivism in a different but still powerful way. The key concept against which the progress of this development will be measured within the constructivist movement is the concept of proof, particularly with respect to Gödel theorems and the resulting split of knowledge into proof and truth. I will read this split, with the help of Lorenzen and Brandom, as a relative differentiation between two co-dependent aspects of self-consciousness that are to be prospectively conceived as two idealized dialogue partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. (1998). Metaphysics. (H. Lawson-Tancred, Trans). London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, E., & Bridges, D. (1980). Constructive analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons. An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, L. E. J. (1907). Over de grondslagen der wiskunde (Ph.D. Thesis). Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, L. E. J. (1975). Collected Works I. In A. Heyting (Ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1893/1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik I–II: Begriffsschriftlich abgeleitet. Jena: H. Pohle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der ‘Principia Mathematica’ und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 37, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1995). Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and their implications. In S. Feferman, J. W. Dawson, W. Goldfarb, C. Parsons, & R. M. Solovay (Eds.), Collected works III (pp. 304–323). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (2003). Collected works V. Correspondence H-Z. In S. Feferman, J. W. Dawson, W. Goldfarb, C. Parsons, & W. Sieg (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The science of logic (G. di Giovanni, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, A. (1956). Intuitionism. An introduction. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. (1926). Über das Unendliche. Mathematische Annalen, 95, 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. (1930). Naturerkennen und Logik. Die Naturwissenschaften, 18, 959–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. (1935). Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Dritter Band: Analysis, Grundlagen der Mathematik, Physik, Verschiedenes. Lebensgeschichte. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781/1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolman, V. (2009). What do Gödel theorems tell us about Hilbert’s solvability thesis? In M. Peliš (Ed.), Logica Yearbook 08 (pp. 83–94). London: College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolman, V. (2010). Continuum, name, and paradox. Synthese, 175, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolman, V. (2015). Logicism as making arithmetic explicit. Erkenntnis, 80, 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolman, V. (2016a). Zahlen. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolman, V. (2016b). Hegel’s bad infinity as a logical problem. Hegel-Bulletin, 37, 258–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolman, V. (2018). Intuition and the end of all -Isms. Organon F, 25, 392–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvasz, L. (2008). Patterns of change. Linguistic innovations in the development of classical mathematics. Basel: Birhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1955). Einführung in die operative Logik und Mathematik. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1962). Metamathematik. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P., & Lorenz, K. (1978). Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1984). Elementargeometrie. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. Parmenides (1961). In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The collected dialogues (F. M. Conford., Tran., pp. 920–957). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütte, K. (1960). Beweistheorie. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (1995). Sinn-Kriterien. Die logischen Grundlagen kritischer Philosophie von Platon bis Wittgenstein. Padeborn: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (2008). Formen der Anschauung, Eine Philosophie der Mathematik. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stekeler-Weithofer, P. Hegel’s analytic pragmatism (Unpublished). See http://www.sozphil.uni-leipzig.de/cm/philosophie/mitarbeiter/pirmin_stekeler/.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1964). Philosophical remarks. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Professor Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer for valuable conversations on the subject and Dr. Tereza Matějčková for the detailed comments on the final draft of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vojtěch Kolman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kolman, V. (2019). The Truth of Proof: A Hegelian Perspective on Constructivism. In: Weiss, C. (eds) Constructive Semantics. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21313-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics