Skip to main content

A Zone to Defend: The Utopian Territorial Experiment of Notre Dame Des Landes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Everyday Resistance

Abstract

In France, a utopian experimental occupation has been under way for the past three years. At Notre Dame des Landes (NDDL) in Brittany, 200 permanent occupiers of evacuated farms are facing off against the authorities. The aim is to carry out a social transformation, with the occupiers transforming their living space into a utopian commune, a gesture that goes far beyond a critique of capitalism. This chapter analyses the initiative empirically and theoretically. It highlights an aspect of this struggle against the instituted totalities of ‘urban capitalism’ and the metropolitan question associated with this critique. It interrogates the hypothesis of autonomy in such a project—which is embodied in a defined territory—referring to the discourses and practices of the occupiers and their revolutionary politics of habitation.

This chapter was written before part of the Zone was dismantled in April 2018, after plans for the airport were cancelled by the government in January 2018. Some of its illegal occupants have since negotiated to remain in the Zone as participants in ‘alternative’ agriculture projects, which the state does authorise. Others are fighting back, refusing to compromise at all with a government that does not recognise non-agricultural collective projects. Forty temporary homes were destroyed by the authorities in 2018. This chapter includes some of the results of a field study conducted during 2015 and 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Lefebvre , capital produces a space in which the physical and the social are inextricably combined.

  2. 2.

    The pragmatic sociology of critique can be understood as critiquing the use of different entities such as social classes or the state as tools of totalisation. On this first level, it involves a meta-critique (sociology of critique). On a second level (practical moments) are the conditions under which the actors themselves live. In pragmatic sociology, these two levels are brought together by the actors themselves, within the scope of existential or reality tests; see Boltanski (2009).

  3. 3.

    The term metropolis designates territorial forms of the government and the circulation of wealth suitable for defining a system of accumulation or mobility or a planning system with functional and security purposes.

  4. 4.

    The bocage is a wet plant-covered area of 1200 hectares with few buildings. For those opposed to the airport, it is an ecosystem that must be preserved, especially because of the rare plants and rodents found there.

  5. 5.

    This Marxist theory aiming to reboot the working class more or less inspired Hardt and Negri’s theory of the ‘multitude’ (2004).

  6. 6.

    The testimonies compiled in a recent collection point in the same direction; see Collectif Mauvaise Troupe (2015).

  7. 7.

    The terms ‘Empire’ or ‘Babylon’ designating market society come up repeatedly in conversations, as do poor working conditions.

  8. 8.

    In France, the term “squat” is the expression of the politicisation of space; the squatters go through regularisation procedures with the public authorities or undertake direct action (sudden occupations aimed at denouncing speculation that are covered by the media ).

  9. 9.

    Several administrative offices were ransacked in spring 2016.

  10. 10.

    In Lefebvre’s catchphrase, a ‘good state’ is impossible, making it necessary to establish relations of counter-power as a guarantee of urban democracy.

  11. 11.

    See, for example, the Marxist analysis of the state in Gramsci (in the 1930s), Poulantzas (in the 1960s), and, more recently, in Harvey (2005).

  12. 12.

    One example is the struggle for the Larzac in France; see Hervieu-Léger and Hervieu (1979).

  13. 13.

    The texts written about the area since the occupation are indeed ‘stories’.

  14. 14.

    That is, to develop strategies; see Deleuze (2008).

  15. 15.

    Hence, many books or activist brochures are collections of testimonies.

  16. 16.

    This corresponds to ‘valuation’; see Dewey (1939).

  17. 17.

    While the knowhow of a baker or a blacksmith is not shared, that of a builder is. This allows construction to become a collective task.

  18. 18.

    The farmers resisted forcefully during the CESAR operation, turning their tractors into defence vehicles. Resorting to sometimes violent techniques enables one to historicise the struggle in relation to the battles that feature more prominently in the political imagination and political violence: the Larzac struggle, Action Directe, and, elsewhere, the Chiapas.

  19. 19.

    Label Zad et autres sornettes https://zad.nadir.org/spip.php?article3270

  20. 20.

    In Proudhon’s libertarian socialism , for example, sharing and pooling is a substitute for authority and the government, and society is a permanent production resulting from collective activity (including economic activity) that takes place in a territory of respectable size: the municipality; see Proudhon (1966); also Scott (2015).

  21. 21.

    The only case to be collectively discussed concerned physical and sexist aggression; it was decided orally that the aggressor had to leave the area.

  22. 22.

    The artistic worker movements in the Zad cannot be likened to the maker culture (do it yourself or Fab Lab).

  23. 23.

    This quality is based on references to recent revolutionary anarchism (Comité Invisible), the radicalism of current autonomist activists, and/or particular texts (e.g., Gramsci, Luxemburg ).

  24. 24.

    This aspect is not dealt with here.

References

  • Bey, H. (2011). T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone. Seattle: Pacific Publishing Studio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier, D. (2007). The Growth of the Commons Paradigm. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons (pp. 27–40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (2009). De la critique: précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2015). Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1975). L’Institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cingolani, P. (2014). Révolutions précaires – essai sur l’avenir de l’émancipation. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collectif Mauvaise Troupe. (2015). ZAD / NO TAV, entretiens. Paris: Editions de l’Eclat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comité Invisible. (2009). The Coming Insurrection (Semiotext(e)/Intervention Series). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comité Invisible. (2014). A nos amis. Paris: La Fabrique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). Commun: essai sur la révolution au XXIe siècle. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1990). Invention du quotidien, vol. 1, Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (1985). Documents relatifs à la fondation de l’internationale situationniste (1948–1957). Paris: Allia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2008). Dialogues avec Claire Parnet. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of Valuation (Vol. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the Creative Class. New York/London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2004). Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervieu-Léger, D., & Hervieu, B. (1979). Le retour à la nature: au fond de la forêt, l’État. Paris: Seuil.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, J.-M. (1997). The Arts of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1972). La pensée marxiste et la ville. Paris: Casterman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A., & Hardt, M. (2004). Multitude: guerre et démocratie à l’âge de l’empire. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogien, A., & Laugier, S. (2014). Le principe démocratie: enquête sur les nouvelles formes du politique. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, P. (1966). Qu’est-ce que la propriété? Garnier-Flammarion, Paris. https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Idée_générale_de_la_Révolution_au_dix-neuvième_siècle. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.

  • Rancière, J. (1998). Aux bords du politique. Paris: La Fabrique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. (2015). Communal Luxury: The Political Imaginary of the Paris Commune. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott James, C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott James, C. (2009). The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasset, C. (2015). Les intellectuels précaires, genèses et réalités d’une figure critique. Thèse de doctorat en sociologie, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1993). Essai sur l’insécurité du territoire. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvaine Bulle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bulle, S. (2020). A Zone to Defend: The Utopian Territorial Experiment of Notre Dame Des Landes. In: Frère, B., Jacquemain, M. (eds) Everyday Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18987-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18987-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18986-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18987-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics