Abstract
A wide variety of complications can present itself whilst proceeding with ortho-orthognathic management, and SFOA is no exception. It is prudent to understand the orthodontics and surgery-related complications and formulate a risk management strategy in order to identify, assess, and implement an appropriate response in terms of prevention, acceptance, and transference of a complication. This chapter divides the complications encountered in SFOA into orthodontic and surgery challenges during the three phases of SFOA:
-
1.
Pre-surgery phase.
-
2.
Surgery phase.
-
3.
Post-surgery phase.
Also, the chapter deals with evaluating the root cause of the complications and offering a suitable resolution to overcome the complications.
If I had an hour to solve a problem I’d spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and 5 minutes thinking about solutions.
—Albert Einstein
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Xia J, Gateno J, Teichgraeber J, Yuan P, Li J, Chen K-C, et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:1441–50.
Gateno J, Alfi D, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF. A geometric classification of jaw deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:S26–31.
Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF, Christensen AM, Lemoine JJ, Liebschner MA, et al. Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:728–34.
Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Christensen AM, Lasky RE, Lemoine JJ, et al. Accuracy of the computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial deformity: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:248–54.
Rustemeyer J, Eke Z, Bremerich A. Perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: the important variables affecting patient satisfaction. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;14:155–62.
Vulink N, Rosenberg A, Plooij J, Koole R, Bergé S, Denys D. Body dysmorphic disorder screening in maxillofacial outpatients presenting for orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:985–91.
Ishigooka J, Iwao M, Suzuki M, Fukuyama Y, Murasaki M, Miura S. Demographic features of patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998;52:283–7.
Walker F, Ayoub AF, Moos KF, Barbenel J. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:573–8.
Walker F, Ayoub AF, Moos KF, Barbenel J. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:567–72.
Ellis E, Tharanon W, Gambrell K. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:562–7.
Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF, editors. New methods to evaluate craniofacial deformity and to plan surgical correction. Seminars in orthodontics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011.
Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:341–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chng, C.K., Gandedkar, N.H., Liou, E.J.W. (2019). Potential Complications and Management of SFOA. In: Surgery-First Orthodontic Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18696-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18696-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18695-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18696-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)