Skip to main content

Effects of Mirror Geometry on the Optical Efficiency of a Linear Fresnel Reflector (LFR)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings

Part of the book series: Innovative Renewable Energy ((INREE))

  • 2469 Accesses

Abstract

The linear Fresnel reflector (LFR) is a concentrating solar thermal power (CSP) technology, which benefits from a relatively simple and low-cost design. It typically comprises of a single receiver tower and several linear mirror elements. In comparison to more conventional solar concentrators, such as the parabolic trough or solar power tower, the LFR has a lower optical efficiency. However, there are numerous parameters, which influence an LFR’s optical performance: mirror width, mirror spacing, mirror number, mirror curvature and receiver height. In many LFR designs, these parameters are not properly analysed with the solar field configuration generally being taken from a known solar power plant or prototype. One of the main reasons behind this is the complexity associated with ray tracing, which would be needed to investigate fully the optics of the system, including surface reflections and shadowing. Comprehensive optical analyses using Monte Carlo ray tracing techniques are both computationally and time intensive, but there is a growing set of ray tracing tools designed for CSP systems. This provides opportunities to achieve gains in efficiencies by investigating system performance for different mirror configurations and sun positions. In this study, SolTrace, a specialised software tool developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), is used to evaluate the FRESDEMO pilot LFR plant located at the Plataforma Solar de Almería, Spain. The FRESDEMO plant comprises of 25 mirror element rows and covers an area of 2100 m2. A number of simulations of the FRESDEMO plant have been carried out before, but this study investigates potential gains in optical efficiency that could have been achieved through varying mirror numbers and widths. Furthermore, the performance of flat mirrors versus variable curved mirrors is investigated. Optical errors are established and compared for a range of different configurations. An outcome from the study is a set of alternative design scenarios to increase the optical efficiency of the LFR, and practical implications of these changes are evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sørensen K et al (2016) Modelling of a cross flow evaporator for CSP application: analysis of the use of different two phase heat transfer and pressure drop correlations. Int J Therm Sci 107:66–76. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1290072916303738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. International Energy Agency (2010) Technology roadmap, concentrating solar power. www.iea.org

  3. Montes MJ et al (2014) A comparative analysis of configurations of linear Fresnel collectors for concentrating solar power. Energy 73:192–203. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214007087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu M et al (2016) Review on concentrating solar power plants and new developments in high temperature thermal energy storage technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53:1411–1432. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211500996X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nixon JD, Davies PA (2012) Cost-exergy optimisation of linear Fresnel reflectors. Sol Energy 86(1):147–156. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X11003501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moghimi MA, Craig KJ, Meyer JP (2015) Optimization of a trapezoidal cavity absorber for the Linear Fresnel Reflector. Sol Energy 119:343–361. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X15003771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiu Y et al (2015) Study on optical and thermal performance of a linear Fresnel solar reflector using molten salt as HTF with MCRT and FVM methods. Appl Energy 146:162–173. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915001762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbas R, Martínez-Val JM (2015) Analytic optical design of linear Fresnel collectors with variable widths and shifts of mirrors. Renew Energy 75:81–92. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114005941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu Y et al (2017) Aiming strategy optimization for uniform flux distribution in the receiver of a linear Fresnel solar reflector using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Appl Energy 205:1394–1407. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917313740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbón A et al (2016) Optimization of the length and position of the absorber tube in small-scale Linear Fresnel Concentrators. Renew Energy 99:986–995. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116306851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qiu Y et al (2016) A comprehensive model for optical and thermal characterization of a linear Fresnel solar reflector with a trapezoidal cavity receiver. Renew Energy 97:129–144. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014811630475X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y et al (2015) Performance analysis of a novel sun-tracking CPC heat pipe evacuated tubular collector. Appl Therm Eng 87:381–388. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431115003889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellos E et al (2016) Design, simulation and optimization of a compound parabolic collector. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 16:53–63. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138816300169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2016.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wendelin T, Dobos A (2013) SolTrace: a ray-tracing code for complex solar optical systems. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu G (2013) Development of an analytical optical method for linear Fresnel collectors. Sol Energy 94:240–252. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X13001862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cruz NC et al (2017) Review of software for optical analyzing and optimizing heliostat fields. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1001–1018. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211730028X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernhard R et al (2008) Linear fresnel collector demonstration on the PSA, part I—design, construction and quality control, in March 1, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tesfamichael T, Wäckelgård E (2000) Angular solar absorptance and incident angle modifier of selective absorbers for solar thermal collectors. Solar Energy 68(4):335–341. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X00000293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00029-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chemisana D et al (2013) Optical performance of solar reflective concentrators: a simple method for optical assessment. Renew Energy 57:120–129. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014811300075X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Nixon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sirimanna, M.P.G., Nixon, J.D. (2020). Effects of Mirror Geometry on the Optical Efficiency of a Linear Fresnel Reflector (LFR). In: Sayigh, A. (eds) Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings. Innovative Renewable Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18487-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18488-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics