Skip to main content

Introduction: The Marketization of Everyday Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Social Meaning of Extra Money

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

Why do ordinary people who used to engage in domestic and leisure activities for free now try to make a profit from them? How and why do people commodify their free time? This book explores the marketization of blogging, cooking, craftwork, gardening, knitting, selling secondhand items, sexcamming, and, more generally, the economic use of free time. The development of web platforms, the current economic context, and the post-Fordist values can account for this extension of market and labor to ordinary people. Three main results emerge: first, commodification generates only small amounts of money which may be perceived as pin money, savings, or labor income. Second, the benefits of commodification are mostly non-economic. And third, commodification requires an intensive “extra work.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This work is supported by the Independent Social Research Foundation; the French National Research Agency in the framework of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program (ANR-15-IDEX-02), University Grenoble-Alpes Strategic Research Initiative (IRS 2017-MATRACA), and University Grenoble-Alpes Data Institute; the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme (MSH) Paris Nord; Paris-Dauphine University (IRISSO); and Sciences Po Grenoble (PACTE).

  2. 2.

    https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals (Accessed 11 February 2019).

  3. 3.

    Race is not investigated in our book. As French sociologists living in France where ethnic statistics are proscribed, we (the editors) lack the data to engage in a race analysis.

References

  • Abdelnour, S. (2017). Moi, petite entreprise. Les auto-entrepreneurs, de l’utopie à la réalité. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, L. (2016). Contingent Labour and the Rewriting of the Sexual Contract. In L. Adkins & M. Dever (Eds.), The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency (pp. 1–28). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, L., & Dever, M. (2014). Gender and Labour in New Times: An Introduction. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(79), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, L., & Dever, M. (Eds.). (2016). The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1986 [2009]). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, D., & Patel, K. (2018). Vlogging Careers: Everyday Expertise Collaboration and Authenticity. In S. Taylor & S. Luckman (Eds.), The New Normal of Working Lives: Critical Studies in Contemporary Work and Employment (pp. 147–168). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M., Gill, R., & Taylor, S. (Eds.). (2013). Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative Industries. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudelot, C., & Gollac, M. (Eds.). (2003). Travailler pour être heureux ? Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baym, N. (2014). Connect with Your Audience! The Relational Labor of Connection. The Communication Review, 18(1), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live. London: HarperCollins Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods. Media, Culture, and Society, 2, 261–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). La Noblesse d’État. Paris: Éditions de minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, D., & Casilli, A. (2015). Qu’est-ce que le Digital Labour? Paris: INA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casilli, A. (2019). En Attendant les robots: Enquête sur le travail du clic. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citton, Y. (2013). Économie de l’attention et nouvelles exploitations numériques. Multitudes, 3(54), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conor, B., Gill, R., & Taylor, S. (2015). Gender and Creative Labour. The Sociological Review, 63(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix, E., Parguel, B., & Benoit-Moreau, F. (2018). Digital Subsistence Entrepreneurs on Facebook. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1–13. http://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.018.

  • Delphy, C. (1977). The Main Enemy: A Materialist Analysis of Women’s Oppression. London: Women’s Research and Resources Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delphy, C., & Leonard, D. (1992). Familiar Exploitation: A New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, B., & Hund, E. (2015). “Having It All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media+Society, 1(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzen, S. (1989). The Sociology of Amateur Sport: An Overview. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 24(2), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekinsmyth, C. (2011). Challenging the Boundaries of Entrepreneurship: The Spatialities and Practices of UK ‘Mumpreneurs’. Geoforum, 42, 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flichy, P. (2017). Les Nouvelles Frontières du travail à l’ère numérique. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2008). Culture and Subjectivity in Neoliberal and Postfeminist Times. Subjectivity, 25, 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the Social Factory? Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godechot, O., Lurol, M., & Méda, D. (1999). Les actifs à la recherche d’un nouvel équilibre entre travail et hors-travail. Premières Synthèses, Dares, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1978). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2018). Bullshit Jobs: A Theory. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2008). The Normalisation of Flexible Female Labour in the Information Economy. Feminist Media Studies, 8(3), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2011). Work’s Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlin-Giret, C. (2017). Quand les héritiers deviennent des « entrepreneurs » : les nouveaux appuis rhétoriques et pratiques de l’accumulation. Revue de la regulation, 22, https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/12388, Online 31 January 2018. Retrieved February 16, 2018.

  • Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (2002 [1947]). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U. (2003). The Making of a Cybertariat: Virtual Work in a Real World. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U. (2018). Eating Us out of House and Home: The Dynamics of Commodification and Decommodification of Reproductive Labour in the Formation of Virtual Work. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(1),111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U. Spencer, N., Syrdal, D., & Holts, K. (2017). Work in the European Gig Economy: Research Results From the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.feps-europe.eu/assets/9d13a6d2-5973-4131-b9c8-3ca5100f92d4/work-in-the-european-gig-full-report-pppdf.pdf

  • Huws, U., Spencer, N., Syrdal, D., & Holts, K. (2018). Working in the Gig Economy: Insights from Europe. In M. Neufeind, J. O’Reilly, & F. Ranft (Eds.), Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 153–162). London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organisation. (2015). World Employment and Social Outlook: The Changing Nature of Jobs. Geneva: International Labour Office, ILO Research Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, K. (2014). The Relevance of “Women’s Work”: Social Reproduction and Immaterial Labor in Digital Media. Television & New Media, 15(1), 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, K. (2015). Feminism, Labor and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan Daniels, A. (1987). Invisible Work. Social Problems, 34(5), 403–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopytoff, I. (1986 [2009]). The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization in Process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 64–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, N., & Loriol, M. (Eds.). (2015). Le Travail passionné: L’engagement artistique, sportif ou politique. Toulouse: Erès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckman, S. (2015). Craft and the Creative Economy. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luckman, S. (2016). Micro-enterprise as Work–Life ‘Magical Solution’. In L. Adkins & M. Dever (Eds.), The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency (pp. 91–108). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, A. (2014). Playing, Gaming, Working and Labouring: Framing the Concepts and Relations. tripleC, 12(2), 735–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, K. (2018). Negotiating the Intimate and the Professional in Mom Blogging. In S. Taylor & S. Luckman (Eds.), The New Normal of Working Lives: Critical Studies in Contemporary Work and Employment (pp. 129–146). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1992 [1867]). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. New York: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matchar, E. (2013). Homeward Bound: Why Women are Embracing the New Domesticity. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méda, D., & Vendramin, P. (2017). Reinventing Work in Europe: Value, Generations and Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mensitieri, G. (2018). Le Plus beau métier du monde. Dans les coulisses de l’industrie de la mode. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, K. (2010). Gendered Hierarchies in Transnational Call Centres. In D. Howcroft & H. Richardson (Eds.), Work and Life in the Global Economy: A Gendered Analysis of Service Work (pp. 78–98). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, R., Passeron, J.-C., Pasquier, D., & Porto-Vasquez, F. (1985). Les Artistes. Essai de morphologie sociale. Paris: La documentation Française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocejo, R. (2017). Masters of Craft. Old Jobs in the New Urban Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orgad, S. (2019). Heading Home: Motherhood, Work and the Failed Promise of Equality. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (1965). Work and Non-Work in Three Occupations. The Sociological Review, 13, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenelle, A. (2017). Sharing Economy Workers: Selling, Not Sharing. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1–15. http://sci-hub.tw/10.1093/cjres/rsw043.

  • Scholz, T. (2012). Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (2018). The Platform Economy: Consequences for Labour, Inequality and the Environment. In M. Neufeind, J. O’Reilly, & F. Ranft (Eds.), Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 163–174). London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonet, M. (2015). La passion au travail, une ambivalence à ne pas dépasser. In N. Le Roux & M. Loriol (Eds.), Le travail passionné: L’engagement artistique, sportif ou politique (pp. 309–320). Toulouse: Erès.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simonet, M. (2018). Travail gratuit: la nouvelle exploitation? Paris: Textuel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1974). Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. (2007). Serious Leisure: A Perspective for Our Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Luckman, S. (Eds.). (2018). The New Normal of Working Lives: Critical Studies in Contemporary Work and Employment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 63(18-2), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform Labor: On the Gendered and Racialized Exploitation of Low-Income Service Work in the ‘On-Demand’ Economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., Sridharan, S., & Ritchie, R. (2010). Understanding Consumption and Entrepreneurship in Subsistence Marketplaces. Journal of Business Research, 63, 570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, F. (1989). Le Travail à côté. Étude d’ethnographie ouvrière. Paris: EMESS and INRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, F., & Lamy, Y. (1999). Amateurs et professionnels. Genèses, 36, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Michailidou, M. (2018). Building Gender Perspectives in the Analysis of Virtual Work. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (1997). The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (2000). The Purchase of Intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry, 25(3), 817–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (2001). Transactions intimes. Genèses, 42(1), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sidonie Naulin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jourdain, A., Naulin, S. (2020). Introduction: The Marketization of Everyday Life. In: Naulin, S., Jourdain, A. (eds) The Social Meaning of Extra Money. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18297-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18297-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18296-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18297-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics