Skip to main content

Real Competition and Empirical Evidence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classical Political Economics and Modern Capitalism

Abstract

The empirical aspects of the classical theory of competition are examined as well as the extent to which a central proposition or economic law of the classical theory of competition, that is, the inter-industry equalization of profit rates, is confirmed. The discussion extends to include important issues of classical competition, such as the presence of monopoly in actual economies and whether or not phenomena usually attributed to monopoly and its power over market forces may have an explanation based on the classical theory of competition. The empirical research refers to the Greek economy, continues with the Japanese and ends with the US economy. Empirical results corroborate the classical theory of competition and the tendential equalization of inter-industry profit rates and rule out the case of monopoly and its power over market forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, Droucopoulos (1991, p. 117), although he noted that between the years 1978 and 1984 the degree of concentration in most industries declined, nevertheless he concluded that the oligopolistic nature of the Greek manufacturing continued; such a conclusion shows that he was influenced by the antimonopoly stance of the socialist-oriented economists of that period. Returning on the same issue, Droucopoulos and Papadogonas (2000) using detailed data sets argued that the degree of concentration of Greek large-scale (that is, establishments operating with at least ten workers) industry for the years 1989 to 1992 has not changed substantially.

  2. 2.

    Since then, there are no relevant industry censuses either because the Statistical Services are reluctant to provide estimates for the politically sensitive ratio (the Greek Statistical Service is no exception) or because of the constantly decreasing importance of the share of manufacturing in GDP and total employment. Consequently, it is not possible to continue a cross-section analysis based on data from the Greek Statistical Service. We report, however, the concentration index of the year 1978 in order to show that the changes in the degree of concentration of the large-scale Greek industries are rather slow. Unfortunately, there are no more recent censuses.

  3. 3.

    Lianos and Droucopoulos (1993) and Droucopoulos and Lianos (1993) pursue the question of equalization of profit rates in Greek manufacturing with somewhat different methodology.

  4. 4.

    For simplicity reasons, we do not include in the presentation the superscripts i defining the industry under study.

  5. 5.

    About the exact statistical properties, see Tsoulfidis and Tsaliki (2013).

  6. 6.

    For more see Tsaliki and Tsoulfidis (2016).

  7. 7.

    Convergence and gravitation are intertwined, and the former is a prerequisite for the latter (see also Duménil and Lévy 1987; Vaona 2011, 2012).

  8. 8.

    In econometric terms, the time series data does not display any known systematic functional form such as ARCH or GARCH.

  9. 9.

    In addition, for the calculation of the stock of the circulating capital, we need to obtain data on the turnover time of production, data which are hard to get.

  10. 10.

    In fact, the obtained results from the usual Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) tests (not shown) are mixed and more likely are contaminated by the presence of nonlinearities not captured by the test. In fact the ADF test assumes that the deviation series of profit rates exhibit linear movements.

  11. 11.

    When we ran regressions of differences of these two series, we found that the intercept and the slope coefficients of the regressions are not statistically different from zero, whereas the R-squared is near zero.

  12. 12.

    If industries 30 and 34 are nonstationary, it follows that the AR(1) scheme cannot be applied; on the other hand, by differencing the data of these two industries, they become stationary but, at the same time, with no economic meaning.

  13. 13.

    See Mueller (1990) for relevant studies about time series data from many countries and results suggesting that the deviations of profit rates from the economy-wide average persist lending support to the idea of the presence of monopolistic characteristics.

  14. 14.

    For data details see Industrial Productivity Database http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/database/JIP2011/.

Bibliography

  • Bahçe, S., & Eres, B. (2010). Testing for classical theory of competition: Evidence from Turkish manufacturing. Paper presented at the annual conference of Eastern Economic Association, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Botwinick, H. (1993). Persistent inequalities: Wage differentials under capitalist competition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourlakis, K. (1988). Are there monopoly profits in Greek manufacturing? Economic Post. 24.3.88. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasid, Ι. (1987). The structure of the Greek manufacturing has not changed. Economic Post. 23.7.87. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, P. (1990). Competition vs. monopoly: An I-O analysis of profit rates and markups for the U.S. economy: 1958-1977. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, New School for Social Research, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis, A. (1984). Is there monopoly capital in Greek industry. Current Issues, 1, 31–49. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragasakis, G. (1981). The capitalist monopoly. Epstimoniki Skepsi, 2, 10–22. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Droukopoulos, V. (1979). The capital and production concentration in our Era. Athens: Ollysous. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Droukopoulos, V. (1991). The degree of concentration of Greek manufacturing: Evolution and prospect. Bulletin of Political Economy, 8, 99–121. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Droucopoulos, V., & Lianos, T. (1993). The persistence of profits in the Greek manufacturing industry, 1963-88. International Review of Applied Economics, 7, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droucopoulos, V., & Papadogonas, T. (2000). Concentration indices: Back to the drawing board. Ekonomia, 4, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (1987). The dynamics of competition: A restoration of the classical analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 11(2), 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaschel, P., & Semmler, W. (1987). Classical and neoclassical competitive adjustment processes. The Manchester School, 55(1), 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glen, J., Lee, K., & Singh, A. (2001). Persistence of profitability and competition in emerging markets. Economics Letters, 72, 247–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, M. (1985). Monopoly or competition in the US economy. Review of Radical Political Economics, 17, 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. (1990). Econometric analysis. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handrinos, S., & Altinoglou, K. (1993). Fixed capital sock in large scale industry of Greece, 1958-1990. Mimeo, Athens: Center of Planning and Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., & Snell, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. (1991). Elements of econometrics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komoto, K. (2001). Do profit rate differentials diminish over time? A statistical analysis of long-term financial data. NLI Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka, J. E. (1979). The effect of market share distribution on industry performance. Review of Εconomics and Statistics, 61, 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lianos, T., & Droucopoulos, V. (1993). Convergence and hierarchy of industrial profit rates: The case of Greek manufacturing. Review of Radical Political Economics, 25, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, N., & Odagiri, H. (2002). Does the ‘persistence of profits’ persist?: A study of company profits in Japan, 1964–97. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(10), 1513–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. (1986). Profits in the long run. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. (1990). The dynamics of company profits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, E., & Glick, M. (1992). Competing microeconomic theories of industrial profits: An empirical approach. In W. Milberg (Ed.), The megacorp & macrodynamics: Essays in memory of Alfred Eichner. New York: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odagiri, H., & Yamawaki, H. (1990). The persistence of profits: International comparison. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), The dynamics of company profits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakos, T. (1982). Industrialization, structural change and policy: The case of Greece 1958-77. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Victoria University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky, S., & Mason, C. F. (1998). On the welfare effects of mergers: Short run vs. long run. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. (1981). The economics of industries and firms: Theories evidence and policy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1989). Inter-industry studies of structure and performance. In R. Schmalensee & R. Willing (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. II). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, A. (1995). The stock market and the corporate sector: A profit based approach. Working Paper No 146. New York: Jerome Levy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism: competition, conflict, crises. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sleuwaegen, L., & Dehandschutter, W. (1986). The critical choice between the concentration ratio and the H-index in assessing industry performance. Journal of Industrial Economy, 35(2), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaliki, P. (2006). Marx on entrepreneurship: A note. International Review of Economics, 53(4), 592–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaliki, P., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2016). Lectures in political economy (3rd ed.). Thessaloniki: Tziolas Publications. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoulfidis, L., & Tsaliki, P. (2013). Classical competition and regulating capital: Theory and empirical evidence. In J. Moudud, C. Bina, & P. Mason (Eds.), Alternative theories of competition: Challenges to orthodoxy (pp. 267–297). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoulfidis, L., Alexiou, C., & Parthenidis, T. (2015). Revisiting profit persistence and the stock market in Japan. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 33(2), 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoulfidis, L., & Tsaliki, P. (2005). Marxian theory of competition and the concept of regulating capital. Review of Radical Political Economy, 37, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, R., & Tonkin, T. (1990). Profitability and accumulation in Canadian manufacturing industries. Presented in the conference: International perspectives on profitability and accumulation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaona, A. (2011). An empirical investigation on the gravitation and convergence of industry return rates in OECD countries. International Review of Applied Economics, 25, 465–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaona, A. (2012). Further econometric evidence of the gravitation and convergence of industrial rates of return on regulating capital. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 35(1), 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, A. (2001). Testing profit rate equalization in the U.S. manufacturing sector: 1947–1998. Jerome Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tsoulfidis, L., Tsaliki, P. (2019). Real Competition and Empirical Evidence. In: Classical Political Economics and Modern Capitalism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17967-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics