Skip to main content

Public Involvement in Balancing Traditional Districting Criteria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Redistricting: A Manual for Analysts, Practitioners, and Citizens

Abstract

Independent districting commissions encourage public engagement in the districting process, helping to balance competing stakeholder interests within guardrails established by Federal and State laws. This chapter highlights three common concerns: avoiding minority vote dilution, preserving communities of interest, and drawing reasonably compact lines. It recounts the public process through which the City of Waterbury, CT agreed upon and enacted a new five-district city aldermanic districting plan in 2015. Successive public commission meetings over several months accommodated a lengthy process of negotiation among citizen groups with different agendas. The outcome was a unanimously agreed-upon plan that addressed the above three concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These aldermanic districts did not need to be exactly equal in total population. Many courts have allowed districting plans with a total deviation from ideal as large as +10%. A plan’s deviation from ideal is measured by taking the absolute difference between the number of persons in the least populous district and in the most populous district and dividing that number by the ideal district size. For the City of Waterbury, this meant that the difference between the least and most populous district should not exceed 2207 persons (10% of the ideal district population). For the adopted plan, this difference is 2175 (calculated as 23,196 minus 21,021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morrison, P.A., Bryan, T.M. (2019). Public Involvement in Balancing Traditional Districting Criteria. In: Redistricting: A Manual for Analysts, Practitioners, and Citizens. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15827-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics