Skip to main content

Whodunit? And How Do We Know? (or Do We?): The Structure of the Epistemological Investigation in Detective Fiction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defining Literary Postmodernism for the Twenty-First Century
  • 719 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is the first of two chapters which demonstrate how literary postmodernism is developed practically, concentrating on the genre of fiction. With a focus on epistemology, questions of knowledge, this chapter looks at the history of detective fiction to demonstrate how postmodern forms of detective fiction fit within the genre. Consequently, the chapter argues that it is possible to have postmodern fiction with an epistemological dominant; thus, such a dominant cannot function as a definition of literary postmodernism. This is done through looking at canonical examples of classical, modernist, late modernist, and postmodernist detective fiction, and how those stories function structurally. It also demonstrates that chronology is not a sufficient means to present the history of detective fiction, as structural elements are also at play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Benvenuti and Rizzoni (1979); Horsley (2005); Knight (2004); Priestman (2003); and Thompson (1993). Stephen Knight includes a third section on diversity, after the chronological breakdown, which includes chapters on race, gender (feminist, lesbian, and male gay detection) and postmodern detection. Horsley, for example, includes sections specifically dealing with sexism and racism and redefining the genre when dealing with those social-political issues. Priestman’s collection also includes chapters dealing specifically with gender and race.

  2. 2.

    This reordering is not intended to cover over important distinctions in the divisions of the genre into various subgenres, whether based on themes (i.e. feminism), analytic focus (i.e. forensic), or types of crime or how graphically they are displayed (as in the cozy). Each of these subgenres and many others deserve specific attention, especially in histories of the genre as a whole, but this division would allow them to be grouped by how the crime is solved, while preserving their other foci.

  3. 3.

    Robert Rushing uses this term to refer to the ever-smaller divisions of crime fiction, into categories so small that it seems ‘whatever one’s taste, there is a detective novel to match’ (2007, 26).

  4. 4.

    This despite the later references to the theories of probability. “Coincidences, in general, are great stumbling-blocks in the way of that class of thinkers who have been educated to know nothing of the theory of probabilities – that theory to which the most glorious objects of human research are indebted for the most glorious of illustration” (Poe 1975, 392). These theories, discussed in Ian Hacking’s work The Emergence of Probability (2006) and tied to crime fiction by Maurizio Ascari (2007), highlight the paradoxical nature of evidence and probability in the world of crime. Poe here, although referring to a contemporary field of probability, falls more in line with Cesare Beccaria’s discussion of moral certainty, which is tantamount to our contemporary legal test of reasonable doubt (Beccaria 1958), and which Poe alludes to with the separation between the reality of his solution and the insistence that there be no preternatural solution to the crime. “It is not too much to say that neither of us believe in preternatural events” (Poe 1975, 388). By disallowing supernatural solutions, Poe is adding limitations to the investigation, which lead closer to a ‘reasonable’ solution rather than an absolute truth.

  5. 5.

    I limit the discussion of Poe’s Dupin series to “Rue Morgue” both for space considerations and for simplicity. “Marie Rogêt” is partially based on a true story and thus has non-generic twists, complicating its use as an example of the genre, and “Purloined Letter” implicates Dupin which violates yet to be articulated rules, but more importantly compromises the purity of the investigative process and the author/reader dynamic.

  6. 6.

    There are, of course, other motivations inherent within crime fiction. Neither the criminals nor the detectives act dispassionately, and often emotion is a considerable factor both in the impetus for readings as well as the rationale of the narrative. This aspect of crime fiction’s history is detailed in Maurizio Ascari’s work A Counter-History of Crime Fiction (2007) among other places. This study, however, remains focused on the epistemological structure of the detective story, and thus does not delve into these other interesting aspects, including those important and necessary for elucidating generic and sub-generic boundaries.

  7. 7.

    Specifically violating Williard Huntington Wright’s (alias SS Van Dine) “Twenty Rules for Writing Detective Stories,” whose first rule states “all clues must be plainly stated and described” (Van Dine 1928, 129).

  8. 8.

    This collection was published in the UK in 1932 with the title The Thirteen Problems.

  9. 9.

    Here again, we can see that we are meant to identify with the sidekick rather than the “detective.” In this case, the audience is carried along through the process, but always after the fact, in the same perspective as Gus, and yet before the police are “clued” in to the evidence.

  10. 10.

    The reference to Eric Stanley Gardner seems to be to the author of the Perry Mason series, Erle Stanley Gardner, who hails, like Chandler, from Southern California.

References

  • Ascari, Maurizio. 2007. A Counter-History of Crime Fiction. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Auster, Paul. 1990. New York Trilogy. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, Caroline. 2011. Reconstructing Memories of Masculine Subjectivity in Memento: Narrative Form and the Fiction of the Self. The Twentieth International Conference on Literature and Psychoanalysis. July 2003, 47–52. Web. 19 Jan 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, Cesare. 1958. Dei delitti e delle pene. In Opere, ed. Sergio Romagnoli, vol. 1. Firenze: Sansoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, E.C. 2017 [1913]. Trent’s Last Case. London: HarperCollins (Detective Story Club Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti, Stefano, and Gianni Rizzoni. 1979. The Whodunit: An Informal History of Detective Fiction. Trans. Anthony Eyre. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David, and Kristin Thompson. 2008. Film Art. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, Jorge Luis. 1964. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings. New York: New Directions Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvino, Italo. 1994 [1979]. Se una notte d’inverno un viaggiatore. Milano: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Raymond. 1944. The Simple Art of Murder. Atlantic Monthly 174 (6): 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989 [1939]. The Big Sleep. San Francisco: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Agatha. 1928. Perilous Journeys of Hercule Poirot: Including The Mystery of the Blue Train, Death on the Nile, and Murder in Mesopotamia. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972 [1944]. Towards Zero. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984 [1933]. The Tuesday Club Murders. New York: Berkley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002 [1926]. The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. London: HarperCollins (Signature Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale, John. 1990. Thomas Pynchon: Allusive Parables of Power. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto. 2000 [1980]. Il nome della rosa. Milano: Bompiani. English edition: Eco, Umberto. 1983. The Name of the Rose. Trans. William Weaver. London: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, Jeanne C. 1999. ‘A Thousand Other Mysteries’: Metaphysical Detection, Ontological Quests. In Detecting Texts: The Metaphysical Detective Story from Poe to Postmodernism, ed. Patricia Merivale and Susan Sweeney. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 2006 [1975]. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability Induction and Statistical Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høeg, Peter. 1992. Frøken Smillas fornemelse for sne. Copenhagen: Rosinante.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopzafel, Anne. 1996. The New York Trilogy: Whodunit?: Tracking the Structure of Paul Auster’s Anti-Detective Novels. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, Lee. 2005. Twentieth-Century Crime Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. 1999 [1898]. The Turn of the Screw, ed. Deborah Esch and Jonathan Warren. 2nd ed. New York: Norton (Norton Critical Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, John. 1991. Toward the Schizo-Text: Paranoia as Semiotic Regime in The Crying of Lot 49. In New Essays on The Crying of Lot 49, ed. Patrick O’Donnell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Stephen. 2004. Crime Fiction, 1800–2000. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain, Ed. 1966. Cop Hater. London: Northumberland Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, Brian. 1987. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memento. 2000. Screenplay by Christopher Nolan. Dir. Christopher Nolan. Perf. Guy Pearce, Carrie-Anne Moss, and Joe Pantoliano. Newmarket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, Edward. 1978. The Sacred, the Profane, and The Crying of Lot 49. In Pynchon: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Edward Mendelson. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Jonathan. 2001. Memento Mori. Esquire 135: 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, Edgar Allen. 1975. The Complete Tales and Poems of Edgar Allen Poe. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestman, Martin. 2003. The Cambridge Companion to Crime Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Psych. 2006. Teleplay by Steve Franks. Dir. Christopher Nolan. Perf. James Roday and Dulé Hill. NBC Universal Television.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pynchon, Thomas. 1965. The Crying of Lot 49. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbe-Grillet. 1959. Dans le labyrinthe. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushing, Robert A. 2007. Resisting Arrest: Detective Fiction and Popular Culture. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöwall, Maj, and Per Wahlöö. 1975. Cop Killer. Trans. Thomas Teal. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, William. 1972. The Detective and the Boundary: Some Notes on the Postmodern Literary Imagination. Boundary 2 1 (1): 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tani, Stefano. 1984. The Doomed Detective: The Contribution of the Detective Novel to Postmodern American and Italian Fiction. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, Tony. 1982. Thomas Pynchon. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Jon. 1993. Fiction, Crime, and Empire: Clues to Modernity and Postmodernism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dine, S.S. 1928. S.S. Van Dine Sets Down Twenty Rules for Detective Stories. American Magazine: 129–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, Alan. 1981. Horizons of Assent: Modernism, Postmodernism, and the Ironic Imagination. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1992. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. Boston: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stephan, M. (2019). Whodunit? And How Do We Know? (or Do We?): The Structure of the Epistemological Investigation in Detective Fiction. In: Defining Literary Postmodernism for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15693-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics