Abstract
Pokémon GO was the first mobile location-based Augmented Reality (AR) game to be widely publicized, and its predecessor—the Ingress game—was the first mobile location-based game reaching a broader audience. Both games are continuously developed and have a large basis of regular players. Therefore, Pokémon GO and Ingress can be seen as successful examples of game design in terms of players’ long-term engagement. The usage of games in engineering education has a long tradition, mostly for mediating the understanding of complex systems and often used in a workshop setting where learning takes place not only during game play but also in the debriefing parts. These games have often been multi-player games and have profited from the player interactions, which, since quite unpredictable, has helped to keep the players’ engagement high. However, the costs of designing such games are high, the time for improvements and adjustments is long, and due to the high dependency of user interactions, it is also difficult to ensure a formalized learning outcome. Thus, from a game design perspective, it is beneficially to know how the game mechanics of successful games are constructed. The aim of the study described in this chapter is to identify the game mechanics of Pokémon GO that lead to the observed high level of player engagement. The data collection is done with the help of a survey (N = 50). The results are refined by a comparison with the results of a similarly structured study on Ingress (N = 131). Both surveys have for the most part gathered players who have been playing regularly since the release of the games. The results of the study are summarized in a set of hypotheses and recommendations for the design of mobile location-based AR games. These findings intend to contribute to an effective design of serious mobile location-based AR games.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akçayır M, Akçayır G (2017) Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature. Educ Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
Andreasen E, Downey B (1996) The Bartle test of gamer psychology. In: Matt Barr’s website. http://matthewbarr.co.uk/bartle/. Accessed 5 Dec 2016
Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R et al (2014) Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educ Technol Soc 17:133–149
Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Kinshuk (2019) Framework for designing motivational augmented reality applications in vocational education and training. Australas J Educ Technol 35:102–117
Bartle RA (1996) Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. J MUD Res 1:19
Buettel JC, Brook BW (2016) Egress! how technophilia can reinforce biophilia to improve ecological restoration. Restor Ecol 24:843–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12387
Chauhan AS (2018) Pokemon GO revenue, statistics and all figures revealed. In: Mobile app daily. https://www.mobileappdaily.com/2018/07/27/pokemon-go-revenue-statistics. Accessed 2 Oct 2018
Chen CH, Ho C-H, Lin J-B (2015) The development of an augmented reality game-based learning environment. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 174:216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.649
Chess S (2014) Augmented regionalism: Ingress as geomediated gaming narrative. Inf Commun Soc 17:1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.881903
Feldman B (2016) Pokémon Go is an okay game, but a great social network. In: New York magazine. http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/07/pokemon-go-is-an-okay-game-but-a-great-social-network.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2017
Fragoso S, Reis BMS (2016) Ludic re-enchantment and the power of locative games: a case study of the game Ingress. In: Abdelnour-Nocera J, Strano M, Ess C et al (eds) Culture, technology, communication. Common world, different futures: 10th IFIP WG 13.8 international conference, CaTaC 2016, London, UK, 15–17 June 2016. Revised Selected Papers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 131–148
Ganzert A, Gielnik T, Hauser P et al (2017) In the footsteps of smartphone-users traces of a deferred community in Ingress and Pokémon Go. Digit Cult Soc. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2017-0204
Giddingsbile S (2016) Pokémon Go as distributed imagination. Mob Media Commun. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916677866
Hamari J, Malik A, Koski J, Johri A (2018) Uses and gratifications of Pokémon Go: why do people play mobile location-based augmented reality games? Int J Hum Comput Interact 00:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1497115
Hauge JB (2014) Mediating skills on risk management for improving the resilience of supply networks by developing and using a serious game. Universität Bremen
Hauge JB, Stanescu IA, Stefan A (2016) Constructing and experimenting pervasive, gamified learning. In: Entertainment computing—ICEC 2016 15th IFIP TC 14 international conference Vienna, Austria. 28–30 Sept 2016
Hernandez A (2015) How safe are you playing Ingress? In: Techaeris. http://techaeris.com/2015/06/24/editorial-how-safe-are-you-playing-ingress/. Accessed 28 Dec 2016
Hodson H (2012) Why Google’s Ingress game is a data gold mine. In: New science https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21628936-200-why-googles-ingress-game-is-a-data-gold-mine/. Accessed 28 Dec 2016
Hunzaker MA (2016) Intent or misinterpretation? Disruptive behaviors within Ingress. North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Ibáñez M-BM-B, Delgado-Kloos C (2018) Augmented reality for STEM learning: a systematic review. Comput Educ 123:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lee JH, Hall MG, Keating S et al (2017) Challenges in preserving augmented reality games: a case study of Ingress and Pokémon GO
Li R, Liu S, Liu Y et al (2016) A probe into Ingress and its social interaction: augmented reality’s influence on mobile game community design. In: vince-li.com. http://vince-li.com/pdf/ingress/paper.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2016
Majorek M, Du Vall M (2015) Ingress: an example of a new dimension in entertainment. Games Cult 11:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015575833
Mayer RE, Fiorella L (2014) 12 principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In: The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 279
Niantic Inc. (2016) Pokémon Go. http://www.pokemongo.com/. Accessed 28 Dec 2016
Niantic Labs (2013) Ingress. In: Mobile application software. http://www.ingress.com/. Accessed 15 Oct 2015
Nisa K, Zulkifli CZ, Abdul Aziz NA (2017) Development of a geoplay learning mechanics and modality principle as a presentation strategy. Int J Multimedia Appl 9:61–73. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijma.2017.9606
Oppermann L, Slussareff M (2016) Pervasive games. In: Dörner R, Göbel S, Rust-Kickmeier MD et al (eds) Entertainment computing and serious games. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 475–520
Paavilainen J, Korhonen H, Alha K et al (2017) The Pokémon Go experience: a location-based augmented reality mobile game goes mainstream. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’17. pp 2493–2498
Peters D, Calvo RA, Ryan RM (2018) Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front Psychol 9:797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797
Pokémon Company International (2018) The official Pokémon Website | Pokemon.com | Explore the world of Pokémon. https://www.pokemon.com/. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
Porteck S (2013) Vive la Résistance! Ingress: Google’s augmented-reality-spiel. c’t Mag für Comput 82–85
Radu I (2014) Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 18:1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
Ratan R, Ritterfeld U (2009) Classifying serious games. In: Ritterfeld U, Cody M, Vorderer P (eds) Serious games: mechanisms and effects. Routledge, New York, pp 10–22
Rauschnabel PA, Rossmann A, tom Dieck MC (2017) An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: the case of Pokémon Go. Comput Hum Behav 76:276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.030
Ryan RM, Deci E (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. Am Psychol 55:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2017) Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications, New York
Santos M, Chen A, Taketomi T (2014) Augmented reality learning experiences: survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Trans 7:38–56
Sheng LY (2013) Modelling learning from Ingress (Google’s augmented reality social game). In: 2013 IEEE 63rd annual conference international council education media, pp. 1–8
Söbke H (2015) Space for seriousness? Player behavior and motivation in quiz apps. In: Chorianopoulos K et al (eds) Entertainment computing—ICEC 2015 14th international conference, ICEC 2015 Trondheim, Norway, 29 Sep–2 Oct 2015 proceedings. Springer, Cham, pp 482–489
Söbke H (2018) A case study of deep gamification in higher engineering education. In: Gentile M, Allegra M, Söbke H (eds) Games and learning alliance, 7th international conference, GALA 2018, Palermo, Italy, 5–7 Dec 2018, Proceedings. Springer, pp 1–12
Söbke H, Bröker T, Kornadt O (2013) Using the master copy—adding educational content to commercial video games. In: de Carvalho CV, Escudeiro P (eds) Proceedings of the 7th European conference on games-based learning, vol 2. Academic conferences and publishing international limited, Reading, pp 521–530
Söbke H, Baalsrud Hauge J, Stefan IA (2017a) Prime example Ingress: Reframing the pervasive game design framework (PGDF). Int J Serious Games 4:39–58. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i2.182
Söbke H, Montag M, Zander S (2017b) Educational AR canvas—towards systematic design of AR learning experiences. In: Ullrich C, Wessner M (eds) Proceedings of DeLFI and GMW workshops 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Chemnitz, Germany
Söbke H, Harder R, Planck-Wiedenbeck U (2018a) Two decades of traffic system education using the simulation game MOBILITY. In: Göbel S, Garcia-Agundez A, Tregel T et al (eds) Serious games 4th joint international conference, JCSG 2018, Darmstadt, Germany, 7–8 Nov 2018, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 43–53
Söbke H, Zander S, Londong J (2018b) Augmented reality als Lernmedium: Potenziale und Implikationen, vol 3. In: Innteract 2018. Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz
Squire KR (2011) Video games and learning: teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press, New York
Stingeder KH (2013) Googles augmented-reality-game “Ingress.” Medienimpulse Beiträge Zur Medienpädagogik, 4
Winegarner B (2015) The 2015 Ingress demographic survey. In: medium.com. https://medium.com/@beth_winegarner/the-2015-ingress-demographic-survey-6e7181790069. Accessed 6 May 2017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Söbke, H., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Stefan, I.A. (2019). Long-Term Engagement in Mobile Location-Based Augmented Reality Games. In: Geroimenko, V. (eds) Augmented Reality Games I. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15615-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15616-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)