Skip to main content

Long-Term Engagement in Mobile Location-Based Augmented Reality Games

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Augmented Reality Games I

Abstract

Pokémon GO was the first mobile location-based Augmented Reality (AR) game to be widely publicized, and its predecessor—the Ingress game—was the first mobile location-based game reaching a broader audience. Both games are continuously developed and have a large basis of regular players. Therefore, Pokémon GO and Ingress can be seen as successful examples of game design in terms of players’ long-term engagement. The usage of games in engineering education has a long tradition, mostly for mediating the understanding of complex systems and often used in a workshop setting where learning takes place not only during game play but also in the debriefing parts. These games have often been multi-player games and have profited from the player interactions, which, since quite unpredictable, has helped to keep the players’ engagement high. However, the costs of designing such games are high, the time for improvements and adjustments is long, and due to the high dependency of user interactions, it is also difficult to ensure a formalized learning outcome. Thus, from a game design perspective, it is beneficially to know how the game mechanics of successful games are constructed. The aim of the study described in this chapter is to identify the game mechanics of Pokémon GO that lead to the observed high level of player engagement. The data collection is done with the help of a survey (N = 50). The results are refined by a comparison with the results of a similarly structured study on Ingress (N = 131). Both surveys have for the most part gathered players who have been playing regularly since the release of the games. The results of the study are summarized in a set of hypotheses and recommendations for the design of mobile location-based AR games. These findings intend to contribute to an effective design of serious mobile location-based AR games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akçayır M, Akçayır G (2017) Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature. Educ Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen E, Downey B (1996) The Bartle test of gamer psychology. In: Matt Barr’s website. http://matthewbarr.co.uk/bartle/. Accessed 5 Dec 2016

  • Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R et al (2014) Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educ Technol Soc 17:133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Kinshuk (2019) Framework for designing motivational augmented reality applications in vocational education and training. Australas J Educ Technol 35:102–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartle RA (1996) Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. J MUD Res 1:19

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettel JC, Brook BW (2016) Egress! how technophilia can reinforce biophilia to improve ecological restoration. Restor Ecol 24:843–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan AS (2018) Pokemon GO revenue, statistics and all figures revealed. In: Mobile app daily. https://www.mobileappdaily.com/2018/07/27/pokemon-go-revenue-statistics. Accessed 2 Oct 2018

  • Chen CH, Ho C-H, Lin J-B (2015) The development of an augmented reality game-based learning environment. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 174:216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chess S (2014) Augmented regionalism: Ingress as geomediated gaming narrative. Inf Commun Soc 17:1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.881903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman B (2016) Pokémon Go is an okay game, but a great social network. In: New York magazine. http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/07/pokemon-go-is-an-okay-game-but-a-great-social-network.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2017

  • Fragoso S, Reis BMS (2016) Ludic re-enchantment and the power of locative games: a case study of the game Ingress. In: Abdelnour-Nocera J, Strano M, Ess C et al (eds) Culture, technology, communication. Common world, different futures: 10th IFIP WG 13.8 international conference, CaTaC 2016, London, UK, 15–17 June 2016. Revised Selected Papers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzert A, Gielnik T, Hauser P et al (2017) In the footsteps of smartphone-users traces of a deferred community in Ingress and Pokémon Go. Digit Cult Soc. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2017-0204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddingsbile S (2016) Pokémon Go as distributed imagination. Mob Media Commun. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916677866

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hamari J, Malik A, Koski J, Johri A (2018) Uses and gratifications of Pokémon Go: why do people play mobile location-based augmented reality games? Int J Hum Comput Interact 00:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1497115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauge JB (2014) Mediating skills on risk management for improving the resilience of supply networks by developing and using a serious game. Universität Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge JB, Stanescu IA, Stefan A (2016) Constructing and experimenting pervasive, gamified learning. In: Entertainment computing—ICEC 2016 15th IFIP TC 14 international conference Vienna, Austria. 28–30 Sept 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez A (2015) How safe are you playing Ingress? In: Techaeris. http://techaeris.com/2015/06/24/editorial-how-safe-are-you-playing-ingress/. Accessed 28 Dec 2016

  • Hodson H (2012) Why Google’s Ingress game is a data gold mine. In: New science https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21628936-200-why-googles-ingress-game-is-a-data-gold-mine/. Accessed 28 Dec 2016

  • Hunzaker MA (2016) Intent or misinterpretation? Disruptive behaviors within Ingress. North Carolina State University, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez M-BM-B, Delgado-Kloos C (2018) Augmented reality for STEM learning: a systematic review. Comput Educ 123:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH, Hall MG, Keating S et al (2017) Challenges in preserving augmented reality games: a case study of Ingress and Pokémon GO

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Liu S, Liu Y et al (2016) A probe into Ingress and its social interaction: augmented reality’s influence on mobile game community design. In: vince-li.com. http://vince-li.com/pdf/ingress/paper.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2016

  • Majorek M, Du Vall M (2015) Ingress: an example of a new dimension in entertainment. Games Cult 11:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015575833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RE, Fiorella L (2014) 12 principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In: The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 279

    Google Scholar 

  • Niantic Inc. (2016) Pokémon Go. http://www.pokemongo.com/. Accessed 28 Dec 2016

  • Niantic Labs (2013) Ingress. In: Mobile application software. http://www.ingress.com/. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Nisa K, Zulkifli CZ, Abdul Aziz NA (2017) Development of a geoplay learning mechanics and modality principle as a presentation strategy. Int J Multimedia Appl 9:61–73. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijma.2017.9606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann L, Slussareff M (2016) Pervasive games. In: Dörner R, Göbel S, Rust-Kickmeier MD et al (eds) Entertainment computing and serious games. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 475–520

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paavilainen J, Korhonen H, Alha K et al (2017) The Pokémon Go experience: a location-based augmented reality mobile game goes mainstream. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’17. pp 2493–2498

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters D, Calvo RA, Ryan RM (2018) Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front Psychol 9:797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokémon Company International (2018) The official Pokémon Website | Pokemon.com | Explore the world of Pokémon. https://www.pokemon.com/. Accessed 5 Oct 2018

  • Porteck S (2013) Vive la Résistance! Ingress: Google’s augmented-reality-spiel. c’t Mag für Comput 82–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Radu I (2014) Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 18:1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratan R, Ritterfeld U (2009) Classifying serious games. In: Ritterfeld U, Cody M, Vorderer P (eds) Serious games: mechanisms and effects. Routledge, New York, pp 10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschnabel PA, Rossmann A, tom Dieck MC (2017) An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: the case of Pokémon Go. Comput Hum Behav 76:276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci E (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. Am Psychol 55:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2017) Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M, Chen A, Taketomi T (2014) Augmented reality learning experiences: survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Trans 7:38–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng LY (2013) Modelling learning from Ingress (Google’s augmented reality social game). In: 2013 IEEE 63rd annual conference international council education media, pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Söbke H (2015) Space for seriousness? Player behavior and motivation in quiz apps. In: Chorianopoulos K et al (eds) Entertainment computing—ICEC 2015 14th international conference, ICEC 2015 Trondheim, Norway, 29 Sep–2 Oct 2015 proceedings. Springer, Cham, pp 482–489

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Söbke H (2018) A case study of deep gamification in higher engineering education. In: Gentile M, Allegra M, Söbke H (eds) Games and learning alliance, 7th international conference, GALA 2018, Palermo, Italy, 5–7 Dec 2018, Proceedings. Springer, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Söbke H, Bröker T, Kornadt O (2013) Using the master copy—adding educational content to commercial video games. In: de Carvalho CV, Escudeiro P (eds) Proceedings of the 7th European conference on games-based learning, vol 2. Academic conferences and publishing international limited, Reading, pp 521–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Söbke H, Baalsrud Hauge J, Stefan IA (2017a) Prime example Ingress: Reframing the pervasive game design framework (PGDF). Int J Serious Games 4:39–58. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i2.182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söbke H, Montag M, Zander S (2017b) Educational AR canvas—towards systematic design of AR learning experiences. In: Ullrich C, Wessner M (eds) Proceedings of DeLFI and GMW workshops 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Chemnitz, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Söbke H, Harder R, Planck-Wiedenbeck U (2018a) Two decades of traffic system education using the simulation game MOBILITY. In: Göbel S, Garcia-Agundez A, Tregel T et al (eds) Serious games 4th joint international conference, JCSG 2018, Darmstadt, Germany, 7–8 Nov 2018, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 43–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Söbke H, Zander S, Londong J (2018b) Augmented reality als Lernmedium: Potenziale und Implikationen, vol 3. In: Innteract 2018. Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire KR (2011) Video games and learning: teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stingeder KH (2013) Googles augmented-reality-game “Ingress.” Medienimpulse Beiträge Zur Medienpädagogik, 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegarner B (2015) The 2015 Ingress demographic survey. In: medium.com. https://medium.com/@beth_winegarner/the-2015-ingress-demographic-survey-6e7181790069. Accessed 6 May 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinrich Söbke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Söbke, H., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Stefan, I.A. (2019). Long-Term Engagement in Mobile Location-Based Augmented Reality Games. In: Geroimenko, V. (eds) Augmented Reality Games I. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15615-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15616-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics