Abstract
China has been pursuing a harmonious neighborhood but it has to face various volatile and even hostile social-political attitudes of its neighbors that have geopolitical tensions with China. Facing China’s rising, some of Asian countries have found that they were trapped in so-called security dilemma with China and a “hedging” strategy has been adopted by quite a few countries in the Asian-Pacific region to cope with the Sino-US Competition in the region. Against this background, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) since 2013 has been trying to improve relations between China and its neighbors by providing various projects of infrastructural investments and free trade, some of these projects being international public goods that can benefit people across countries. To some extent, the tension of “security dilemma” has been reducing alongside the development of the BRI and more and more Asian people recognize that a rising China can bring more public goods and benefits to this region.
Using the 2014–2016 Asian Barometer Survey data, this research wants to discover what is the perception of China’s influence among Asian people along with the rising of China in course and whether or not they have seen China’s impact on Asia as favorable, especially in the BRI context. Surveyed data of Eleven Asian countries are divided into two groups: four countries that have major sovereign disputes with China and seven countries with no such disputes. We analyze and compare different perceptions of the two groups on China’s rising. Besides, we examine how people of the total 11 Asian countries viewed China and the USA regarding their influences in Asia, at present and in the future.
Generally speaking, geopolitical relationship, cultural proximity, and economic benefits from collaboration with China have common while differentiated effects on their perceptions of China’s rising and impact. The BRI is playing a positive role in easing many geopolitical tensions on one hand and is also incurring some complicated feelings like fear of asymmetric economic inter-dependency among Asian people on the other hand. Besides, China is still in need of enhancing its soft power to win over Asian people and the international community in order to become a real world leader.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
They are Japan, The Philippines, Vietnam, and Malaysia.
- 2.
They are Cambodia, Indonesia, Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Mongolia, and Myanmar. The sovereign disputes in the South China Sea between Indonesia and China have been in a less marked degree.
References
Chan, S. (2010). An Odd Thing Happened on the Way to Balancing: East Asian States’ Reactions to China’s Rise. International Studies Review, 12(3), 406–408.
Chu, Y.-h., Liu, K., & Huang, M.-h. (2015). How East Asians View the Rise of China. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(93), 398–420.
Chung, J. H. (2009/2010). East Asia Responds to the Rise of China: Patterns and Variations. Pacific Affairs, 82(4), 657–675.
Collins, A. (1997). The Security Dilemma and the End of the Cold War (pp. 11–14). Edinburgh: Keele University Press.
Devlin, K. (2018). Five Charts on Global Views of China. Retrieved from the Pew Research Center: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/19/5-charts-on-global-views-of-china/
Goh, E. (2007). Southeast Asian Perspectives on the China Challenge. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 30(4–5), 813–824.
Huang, H. (2015). The One Belt and One Road Strategy: From a Perspective of Public Goods (in Chinese). World Economics and Politics, (6), 138–155.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (pp. 233–236). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214.
Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (1999). Defining Global Public Goods. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (pp. 4–5). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuik, C.-C. (2008). The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 167.
Lima, D. J., & Copper, Z. (2015). Reassessing Hedging: The Logic of Alignment in East Asia. Security Studies, 24(4), 696–727.
Liu, F., & Chen, Z. (2015). The Strategic Choices of East Asian Countries Towards China’s Rise: A Perspective of Neo-Classical Realism (in Chinese). Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies, (4), 4–25.
Liu, R. (2017). Great Power’s Competition and the Evolution of South East Asia State’s Regional Strategy (in Chinese). World Economic and Politics, (4), 60–82.
McDougall, D. (2012). Responses to Rising China in the East Asian Region: Soft Balancing with Accommodation. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(73), 1–17.
Mearsheimer, J. (2014, April 18). Can China Rise Peacefully? The National Interest.
Ministry of Commence of China. (2017, November 17). The Brief of the Press Conference of MOC. Retrieved from http://cn.chinagate.cn/webcast/2017-11/17/content_50061833.htm
Nye, J. S. (2017, January 9). The Kindleberger’s Trap. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-china-kindleberger-trap-by-joseph-s%2D%2Dnye-2017-01?barrier=accesspaylog
Olson, M. (1971). Increasing the Incentives for International Cooperation. International Organization, 25(4), 866–974.
Portland Communications. (2017). A Global Ranking of Soft Power 2017. Retrieved from Portland Communications: https://portland-communications.com/publications/a-global-ranking-of-soft-power-2017/
Ross, R. S. (2006). Balance of Power Politics and the Rise of China: Accommodation and Balancing in East Asia. Security Studies, 15(3), 355–395.
Syailendra, E. A. (2017, January). The Coming Uncertainty: US-Southeast Asia Relations in the Age of Trump. Fair Observer.
The People’s Daily. (2018, October 5). The Editorial. The People’s Daily. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-10/05/content_5327979.htm
Welsh, B., & Chang, A. (2015). Choosing China: Public Perceptions of “China as a Model”. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(93), 442–456.
Wheeler, N., & Booth, K. (1992). The Security Dilemma. In J. Baylis & N. S. Rengger (Eds.), Dilemmas of World Politics: International Issues in a Changing World (p. 29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xi, J. (2017). The Speech Delivered by Xi Jinping at the 2017 Davos Forum. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-01/18/c_1120331545.htm
Xi, J. (2018). The Speech Delivered by Xi Jinping at the 2018 Bo’Ao Forum. Retrieved from http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2018/04-10/8487301.shtml
Yee, H., & Storey, I. (2002). The China Threat: Perceptions, Myths and Reality (pp. 250–252). London: Routledge.
Yuan, I. (2018). Dare to Go First: China’s Initiative on Formulating International Rules for Cross-Border E-Commerce (in Chinese). Prospect & Exploration, 16(5), 62–75.
Zheng, Z. (2018, January 7). It’s Time to Provide International Public Goods to the World (in Chinese). The People’s Daily, p. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zheng, Z. (2019). The Changing Asian Perception of China’s Rising: A BRI Context. In: Syed, J., Ying, YH. (eds) China’s Belt and Road Initiative in a Global Context. Palgrave Macmillan Asian Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14722-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14722-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14721-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14722-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)