Abstract
For millennia, societies have organized and maintained armies to defend their sovereignty, extend their power, or obtain additional resources. Often the greatness of a nation was measured by the size of its army. With the establishment of a large military force comes the burden of equipping and sustaining them in a way that will maximize their effectiveness. This gets even more challenging when an army is expeditionary, that is, when they are asked to move over long distances far from their home. One of the most difficult of these logistical burdens is providing the quantity and quality of food required to sustain an army.
Feeding an army is a daunting task. So much so, that for centuries the emphasis was on simply providing enough food to keep soldiers alive. Eventually, nutrition science provided information on how food could be used to prevent disease, improve performance, and promote well-being. The most modern military forces are no longer satisfied with providing enough food to feed an army, but are endeavoring to provide the right food to optimize their physical, cognitive, and emotional condition.
For the US Armed Forces, military feeding has evolved greatly in the last century. Changes have been driven by new discoveries in nutritional biochemistry and behavioral science, innovative food processing technologies, diverse operating environments, and revised military strategies. Each of those factors has played a significant role in how the US military sustains its forces both at home and abroad.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Arcidiacono, S., et al. (2018). The current state and future direction of DoD gut microbiome research: A summary of the first DoD gut microbiome informational meeting. Standards in Genomic Sciences, 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-018-0308-0.
Baines, E., & Blatchford, P. (2012). Let’s do (school) lunch: Lessons in social and emotional development can never replace the real thing. University College London, Institute of Education, IOE London Blog. https://ioelondonblog.wordpress.com/2012/07/24/lets-do-school-lunch-lessons-in-social-and-emotional-development-can-never-replace-the-real-thing/. Accessed 22 Dec 2018.
Capaldi, E. D. (Ed.). (1996). Why we eat what we eat: The psychology of eating. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cardello, A. V., et al. (2012). Consumer and sensory testing of rations. In A. H. Barrett & A. V. Cardello (Eds.), Military food engineering and ration technology (p. 351). Lancaster: DEStech Publications.
Darsch, G. A., & Moody, S. M. (2009). The packaged military meal. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and practice: Interdisciplinary research and business applications. Woodhead: Cambridge, UK.
Institute of Medicine. (2005). Dietary reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10925. Accessed 5 Jan 2019.
Jacob, H. (1944). Six thousand years of bread. Garden City: Doubleday, Doran and Company.
Lyle, A. (2015). Odierno: Sequestration threatens army readiness. DoD News, Defense Media Activity. https://dod.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/604003/. Accessed 23 Dec 2018.
Mäkelä, J. (2009). Meals: The social perspective. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and practice: Interdisciplinary research and business applications (pp. 41–43). Woodhead: Cambridge, UK.
Mrak, E. (1970). Food research and development for the armed forces. In P. Martin (Ed.), Symposium on feeding the military man. Natick: National Academy of Science-National Research Council.
Office of the Quartermaster General. (1946). Quartermaster corp manual 17-8 committee on food research, research program 1945–1946. Chicago: Army Service Forces.
Risch, E. (1953). The quartermaster corps: Organization, supply, and services. Washington: GPO.
Samuels, J. P., et al. (1947). A report on wartime problems in subsistence research and development (Vol. 12, Ration development). Chicago: Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces.
Smith, E. E., & Psychological Research Associates. (1961). Methods for changing consumer attitudes: A report of three experiments. Prepared for Quartermaster Food & Container Institute for the Armed Forces, Chicago.
Steiner, P. (1968). Disease in the civil war. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
The National Provisioner. (1981) Meat for the Multitudes. 185(1), 27–285.
Thomas, M. A. J. C. D., et al. (1985). Nutrient intakes and nutritional status of soldiers consuming the meal, ready-to-eat (MRE XII) during a 30-day field training exercise (Technical report no. T95-6). Alexandria: DTIC.
Thrasher, H. (1943). Model messes for the ETO. Records of the US Army headquarters, European theater of operations, historical section. Dwight D. Eisenhower Library, 1941–1946: microfilm box 7, roll 37.
United States. Armed Forces Food and Container Institute. (1963). Operational rations current and future. Chicago: Food and Container Institute.
US Army, NRDEC. (1992). Natick Pam 30-2 operational rations. Natick: Natick Research, Development & Engineering Center.
US Army Technical Bulletin Medical (TB MED) 507. (2003). Heat stress control and heat casualty management. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
US Army Training Circular (TC) 4-02.3. (2015). Field hygiene and sanitation. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply
About this entry
Cite this entry
Moody, S.M. (2020). Feeding the US Military: The Development of Military Rations. In: Meiselman, H. (eds) Handbook of Eating and Drinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14504-0_76
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14504-0_76
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14503-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14504-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences