Skip to main content

A Framework for Integrating Sustainability Estimation with Concepts of Rules of Building Measurement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data-Driven Modeling for Sustainable Engineering (ICEASSM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 72))

Abstract

BIM promises improvement in project delivery efficiencies such as reduction in costs and errors and timely completion. Benefits are also expected in sustainable construction aspect with research efforts being extended to sustainable design and assessment. These efforts are still been explored for the purposes of unifying quantification methodologies, the standardization of system boundaries, terms of references and sustainability measures. Embodied energy and CO2 are two common measures that have been widely used in the construction sector. Although a number calculation system exists, they are not useful to the iterations that occur at the early project life cycle stages. At the procurement stage, professionals often rely on schedules and bill of quantities with no reference to sustainability credentials. It is therefore important to integrate sustainability measure with concepts in standard measurement methods. As such, we propose a framework to integrate sustainability credential with the concepts in rule of building measurement. We conclude that this framework can be applicable to any rule of building measurement and it is implementable in a computer programmable environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harries H (2007) Embodied energy: masonry walling in South Africa—Technical note #7. (cited 10 May 2010). Available from: http://www.claybrick.org/content/07-embodied-energy-masonry-walling-south-africa

  2. Shrivastava S, Chini A (2012) Using building information modeling to assess the initial embodied energy of a building. Int J Constr Manage 12(1):51–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K (2010) Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy Build 42(10):1592–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pacheco-Torgal F, Faria J, Jalali S (2013) Embodied energy versus operational energy. Showing the shortcomings of the energy performance building directive (EPBD). In: Materials science forum, Trans Tech Publ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabeza LF, Rincón L, Vilariño V, Pérez G, Castell A (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:394–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixit MK, Fernández-Solís JL, Lavy S, Culp CH (2012) Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: a review paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(6):3730–3743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sartori I, Hestnes AG (2007) Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy Build 39(3):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thormark C (2006) The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building. Build Environ 41(8):1019–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. González MJ, García Navarro, J (2006) Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Build Environ 41(7):902–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sturgis S, Roberts G (2010) Redefining zero: carbon profiling as a solution to whole life carbon emission measurement. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cabeza LF, Barreneche C, Miró L, Morera JM, Bartolí E, Fernández AI (2013) Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 23:536–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hou S, Li H, Rezgui Y (2015) Ontology-based approach for structural design considering low embodied energy and carbon. Energy Build 102:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang L, Issa RR (2012) Ontology-based partial building information model extraction. J Comput Civ Eng 27(6):576–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhiliang M, Zhenhua W, Wu S, Zhe L (2011) Application and extension of the IFC standard in construction cost estimating for tendering in China. Autom Constr 20(2):196–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma Z, Wei Z, Zhang X (2013) Semi-automatic and specification-compliant cost estimation for tendering of building projects based on IFC data of design model. Autom Constr 30:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheung FK, Rihan J, Tah J, Duce D, Kurul E (2012) Early stage multi-level cost estimation for schematic BIM models. Autom Constr 27:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abanda F, Kamsu-Foguem B, Tah J (2015) Towards an Intelligent Ontology Construction Cost Estimation System: using BIM and New Rules of Measurement Techniques. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Comput Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 9(1):294–299

    Google Scholar 

  18. HMG (2005) Securing the future: delivering the UK sustainable development strategy. The Stationary Office (Her Majesty’s Government), London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ding GKC (2008) Sustainable construction-role of environmental assessment tools. Environ Manage 86:451–464

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oti AH, Tizani W (2015) BIM extension for the sustainability appraisal of conceptual steel design. Adv Eng Inform 29(1):28–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gertsev V, Gertseva V (2004) Classification of mathematical models in ecology. Ecol Model 178(3):329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kundzewicz Z, Afouda A, Szolgay J (2000) Mathematical modelling. Hydrology 171:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hersh (2006) Mathematical modelling for sustainable development. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN: 3540312242

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dixit MK, Fernández-Solís JL, Lavy S, Culp CH (2010) Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: a literature review. Energy Build 42(8):1238–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang Y, Ries RJ, Wang Y (2010) The embodied energy and environmental emissions of construction projects in China: an economic input–output LCA model. Energy policy 38(11):6597–6603

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akponanabofa Henry Oti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oti, A.H., Abanda, H.F. (2020). A Framework for Integrating Sustainability Estimation with Concepts of Rules of Building Measurement. In: Adjallah, K., Birregah, B., Abanda, H. (eds) Data-Driven Modeling for Sustainable Engineering. ICEASSM 2017. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 72. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13697-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics