Skip to main content

Exploring Protest Publics: A New Conceptual Frame for Civil Participation Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Protest Publics

Part of the book series: Societies and Political Orders in Transition ((SOCPOT))

Abstract

This paper addresses the conceptual problem of defining the origin, the structure, and social foundations of massive and lasting peaceful street protests, which appeared spontaneously at the beginning of the new millennia in countries with very different levels of public wealth and sociopolitical development. Driven by different reasons, addressing different targets, these mass street actions have many common features that allow us to consider them a single phenomenon, which we define as a new type of social engagement, distinguished both from civil society organizations and social movements. This type of engagement is characterized by the formation and activities of protest publics, which can have deep and lasting impact on both society and policy process by transforming the public sphere through changing dominant public discourses. Such activities are largely based on a common demand of an ethical nature that can bring together many diverse social groups and mini-publics, focused on particular clusters of issues. The paper explores self-organized publics as collective social actors with unique features and capacities. It also develops a conceptual frame for protest event analysis as manifestations of protest publics, which allows us to identify the type of specific public assembled for each event, its “qualities of actorness,” and its transformative potential. This conceptual frame is then applied to reconstruct the “Bolotnaya actions” in Moscow and the protests against construction of the Gazprom office tower in St. Petersburg, which makes it possible to compare the types of publics that were involved in those protests. The results include suggestions and theorizing protest actions based on the qualities of protest publics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Another web resource that is worth mentioning was a website called Spasi Piter [Save Petersburg] (http://www.spasipiter.ru) that was specially created for the monitoring of the court cases campaigns that were organized by construction protesters, so that everyone interested could read legal documents regulating the process of construction and follow all the stages of court hearings.

References

  • Aleskerov, F., & Belyaeva, N. (2008). Kolichestvennyiy analiz razvitosti grazhdanskogo obschestva v regionah Rossii: parametryi, metodika, pilotnyie issledovaniya [Quantitative analysis of the development of civil society in the regions of Russia: Parameters, methodology, pilot studies]. Politia, 3, 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2002). The third sector in Europe. Civil society working papers (Vol. 12). London: Centre for Civil Society at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva, N. (2007). Publichnaya politika v Rossii: soprotivlenie sredyi [Public policy in Russia: resistance of the environment]. The Political Studies, 1, 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva, N. (2011a). Analysts: ‘Consultants’ or ‘independent policy actors’. Politicka Misao, 48(5), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva, N. (2011b). Razvitie kontsepta publichnoy politiki: vnimanie “dvizhuschim silam” i upravlyayuschim sub’ektam [Development of the concept of public policy: Attention to “driving forces” and managing entities]. The Political Studies, 3, 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva, N. (2012). “Public” as a “social actor” vs. “public” as a “target audience”. Conceptual connection between “the public”, “civil society” and “community”. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops 10–12 April (Antwerpen). Retrieved June 14, 2018, from https://ecpr.eu/Events/PaperDetails.aspx?PaperID=6444&EventID=6

  • Belyaeva, N., & Dzhibladze, A. (2014). “Public” as a “social actor” vs. “public” as a “target audience”: Conceptual connection between “the public” and “civil society”. In E. Yasin (Ed.), XIV April International Scientific Conference on the Problems of Economic Development and Society (Vol. 2, pp. 377–389). Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva, N., & Proskuryakova, L. (2008). CIVICUS civil society index – Shortened assessment tool. Report for the Russian Federation. Moscow: INTERLEGAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein, J. (2004). How publics matter: A handbook for alternative world-making. American Quarterly, 56(1), 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, C. (2014). Contents. In NGOs, political protest, and civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, C. (Ed.). (2012). Gorodskie dvizheniya Rossii v. 2009–2012 godah: na puti k politicheskomu [City movements in Russia in 2009–2012: On the way to the political]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, C., Miryasova, O. A., & Demidov, A. (2010). Ot obyivateley k aktivistam. Zarozhdayuschiesya sotsialnyie dvizheniya v sovremennoy Rossii [From the townsfolk to activists. Nascent social movements in modern Russia]. Moscow: Tri kvadrata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2017). Political economy and social movement studies: The class basis of anti-austerity protests. Anthropological Theory, 17(4), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Mattoni, A. (Eds.). (2014). Social movements in times of crisis. Colchester, UK: ECPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. (2010). Gazprom versus the skyline: Spatial displacement and social contention in St. Petersburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladarev, B. (2012). Eto nash gorod!: analiz peterburgskogo dvizheniya za sokhraneniye sotsialnogo nasledia [This is our city!: Analysis of the St Petersburg movement for the preservation of the social heritage]. In C. Clement (Ed.), Gorodskie dvizheniya Rossii v. 2009–2012 godah: na puti k politicheskomu [City movements in Russia in 2009–2012: On the way to the political] (pp. 23–146). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1983). Communication behaviors and attitudes of environmental publics. Two studies. Journalism Monographs, 81, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, V. F. (2004). Assessing and strengthening civil society worldwide. A project description of the CIVICUS civil society index: A participatory needs assessment and action-planning tool for society. Retrieved September 23, 2016, from http://www.civicus.org

  • Lippmann, W. (1993). The phantom public. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, N., & Clarke, J. (2013). Public crises, public futures. Cultural Studies, 27(6), 933–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peshkopia, R. (2008). In search of the private, public, and counterpublic: Modernity, postmodernity, and postsocialism. New Political Science, 30(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. (2009). Managing society: Protest, civil society, and regime in Putin’s Russia. Slavic Review, 68(3), 528–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., & Sokolowski, S. W. (1999). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & List, R. (2004). Global civil society: An overview. Bloomfield, NJ: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768–2004. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. G. (2009). Social movements and contentious politics. In C. Boix & R. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, G. (1993). A homo narrans paradigm for public relations: Combining Bormann’s symbolic convergence theory and Grunig’s situational theory of publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5(3), 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkov, D. (2012). Protestnyie mitingi v Rossii kontsa 2011 – nachala 2012 godov: zapros na demokratizatsiyu politicheskih institutov [Protest rallies in Russia at the end of 2011 – early 2012: Demand for the democratization of political institutions]. Journal of Public Opinion, 2(112), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkov, D. (2013). Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v situatsii neopredelennosti. V: Puti Rossii. Istoriya sotsialnogo opyita [Civil society in a situation of uncertainty]. In M. Pugachev & V. Zharkov (Eds.), The ways of Russia. History of social experience (pp. 206–215). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorozheykina, T. (2014). Grazhdanskoe obschestvo: chto dalshe? [Civil society: What next?]. Otechestvennyie zapiski, 3(60), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg, D. (2002). Going out in public: Visibility and anonymity in Michael Warner’s ‘publics and counterpublics’. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88(4), 426–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanitsky, O. (2012). Protestnoe dvizhenie 2011–2012 godov: nekotoryie itogi [Protest movement 2011–2012: Some results]. Power, 2, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

Media References

Web Resources

  • Gazprom – City. (2018). Portal opponents of the business center of OAO Gazprom. Retrieved June 12, 2018, from http://gazprom-city.spb.ru/

  • LGBT-grani. (2011, December 25). V Moskve v mitinge “Za chestnyie vyiboryi!” prinyala uchastie ob’edinYonnaya LGBT-kolonna [In Moscow in the rally “For Fair Elections!” the united LGBT-column took part]. LGBT-grani. Retrieved June 13, 2018, from https://lgbt-grani.livejournal.com/1254273.html

  • Living City. (2018). Dvizhenie “Zhivoy gorod” [Movement “Living City”]. Retrieved June 14, 2018, from http://www.save-spb.ru/

  • WCIOM. (2011). Poll conducted by the All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) at a rally held in Moscow on December 24, 2011. Retrieved June 14, 2018, from https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=1498

Download references

Funding

The chapter was prepared within the framework of the Academic Fund Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2016–2017 (grant № 17-05-0018) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Belyaeva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Belyaeva, N. (2019). Exploring Protest Publics: A New Conceptual Frame for Civil Participation Analysis. In: Belyaeva, N., Albert, V., Zaytsev, D.G. (eds) Protest Publics. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05475-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics