Abstract
Trust is essential when using technology. If people do not trust new technology, they do not accept it. If people do not accept new technologies such as autonomous ships, their development is hampered in the absence of financial support. The importance of trust brings into question the essential conceptual components of phenomena that contribute to trust. This knowledge is required for the basis of investigating trust in technology. Especially, it is important to understand why humans trust. The reasons can be intuitive but they can also be supported by rational arguments. The latter type of trust can be called rational trust. A beneficial way of considering rational trust in technology can be reached by defining aspects of technologies that should be investigated when attempting to design for trust in technology. Therefore, the basic conceptual dimensions of technology supported actions are analyzed in order to define the essential elements of rational trust in technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Frijda, N.H.: The Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Hawley, K.: Trust: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Saariluoma, P., Cañas, J., Leikas, J.: Designing for Life: A Human Perspective on Technology Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2016)
Power, M., Dalgleish, T.: Cognition and Emotion: From Order to Disorder. Psychology Press, New York (1997)
Saariluoma, P., Jokinen, J.P.: Emotional dimensions of user experience: a user psychological analysis. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30(4), 303–320 (2014)
Scherer, K.R.: What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inf. 44(4), 695–729 (2005)
Franken, I.H.A.: Behavioral approach system (BAS) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving. Pers. Individ. Differ. 32, 349–355 (2002)
Brentano, F.: Psychologie vom Empirischen Standpunkt. Felix Meiner, Hamburg (1874/1955)
Dennett, D.: Consciousness Explained. Little Brown Publishers, Boston (1991)
Husserl, E.: Logische Unterschungen I-II [Logical Investigations]. Niemeyer, Halle (1901)
Lowe, E.J.: Substance causation, powers, and human agency. In: Gibb, S.C., Lowe, E.J., Ingthorsson, R.D. (eds.) Mental Causation and Ontology, pp. 153–172. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)
Searle, J.: The Rediscovery of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Damasio, A.R.: The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace, New York (1999)
Frost-Arnold, K.: The cognitive attitude of rational trust. Synthese 191(9), 1957–1974 (2014)
Möllering, G.: Rational, institutional and active trust: just do it. In: Trust under Pressure: Empirical Investigations of Trust and Trust Building in Uncertain Circumstances, vol. 17, p. 30 (2005)
Tuomela, M.: A collective’s rational trust in a collective’s action. ProtoSociology 18, 87–126 (2003)
Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (July 1998), pp. 72–79. IEEE (1998)
Yao-Hua Tan, W.T.: Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 5(2), 61–74 (2000)
Leikas, J.: Life-Based Design – A Holistic Approach to Designing Human-Technology Interaction. Edita Prima Oy, Helsinki (2009)
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R., Benjamins, V.R.: What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl. 14(1), 20–26 (1999)
Gero, J.S.: Generalizing design cognition research. DTRS 8, 187–198 (2010)
Vezina, B.: Universals and particulars: aristotle’s ontological theory and criticism of the platonic forms. Undergrad. Rev. 3(1), 101–103 (2007)
Parsons, G.: The Philosophy of Design. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, October 2005, pp. 347–354. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)
Waytz, A., Heafner, J., Epley, N.: The mind in the machine: anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 113–117 (2014)
Saariluoma, P.: Foundational Analysis: Presuppositions in Experimental Psychology. Routledge, London (2015)
Lotman, J.: On the semiosphere. Sign Syst. Stud. 33(1), 205–229 (2005)
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Wiley, Loboken (2009)
Cariani, P.: Life’s journey through the semiosphere. Semiotica-La Haye Berlin 120, 243–258 (1998)
Saariluoma, P., Rousi, R.: Symbolic interactions: towards a cognitive scientific theory of meaning in human technology interaction. J. Adv. Hum. 3(3), 310–323 (2015)
Ford, M.: Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. Basic Books, New York (2015)
Achinstein, P.: The Nature of Explanation. Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford (1983)
Bunge, M.: Scientific Research, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin (1967)
Hempel, C.G., Oppenheim, P.: Studies in the logic of explanation. Philos. Sci. 15(2), 135–175 (1948)
Woodward, J.: Explanation in neurobiology: an interventionist perspective. In: Kaplan, D.M. (ed.) Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Prospects and problems (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saariluoma, P., Karvonen, H., Rousi, R. (2019). Techno-Trust and Rational Trust in Technology – A Conceptual Investigation. In: Barricelli, B., et al. Human Work Interaction Design. Designing Engaging Automation. HWID 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05296-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05297-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)