Skip to main content

Civil Commitment of Sex Offenders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sexually Violent Predators: A Clinical Science Handbook
  • 752 Accesses

Abstract

Civil preventive detention, by its very nature, represents a departure from the normal model of criminal justice. In the case of sex offender civil commitment, the circumstances warranting detention are no more dire than for other serious crimes. Yet, sex offenders are treated as a special class, based upon pseudoscience and cultural panic. State and federal sexually violent predator laws that allow for lifetime civil commitment of sex offenders, premised on myths that allocate substantial resources in a never-ending criminal war, do not create a just or better society.

Portions of this chapter have previously appeared in The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, and Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1996). Task force report on sexually dangerous offenders. Washington, D.C.: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Evans, A., & Noonan, S. (2008, July). Grid & bear it. The Champion, 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U.S. 107 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denniston, L. (2009, April 3). Release of sex offenders delayed. SCOTUSBLOG. http://www.scotusblog.com/2009/04/release-of-sex-offenders-delayed/

  • Doe v Miller, 405 F.3d 700, 707. (8th Cir. 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. M. (2009). To catch a predator, and then commit him for life: Analyzing the Adam Walsh Act’s Civil Commitment Scheme under 18 U.S.C. § 4248 – Part one. The Champion, 33, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friel, B. (2006, March 25). The war on kiddie porn. National Journal, 38, 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, L. A. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, E. (2006). Failure to protect: America’s sexual predator laws and the rise of the preventative state (p. 3). Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, T. R. (2011, April). Inevitable recidivism: The origin and centrality of an urban legend. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34, 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence V. Texas, 539 U.S. 558. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, D. H. (2008). Residency restrictions for sex offenders: A failure of public policy. Planning & Environmental Law, 60, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota ex rel. Pearson v. Probate Ct. of Ramsey County, 309 U.S. 270. (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2008). The mythical divide between collateral and direct consequences of criminal convictions: Involuntary commitment of “sexually violent predators”. Minnesota Law Review, 93, 670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sex offenders’ release is blocked. (2009, April 4). Los Angeles Times. p. A14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Static-99r Coding Form. Retrieved from http://www.static99.org/pdfdocs/static-99rcodingform.pdf

  • Toobin, J. (2010, September 27). Without a paddle; can Stephen Breyer save the Obama agenda in the Supreme Court. The New Yorker. p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Ayers, 371 Fed. Appx. 162. (2nd Cir. 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Carta, 592 F.3d 34, 39. (1st Cir. 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Comstock, 507 F. Supp. 2d 522. (E.D.N.C. 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Comstock, 551 F.3d 274. (4th Cir. 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Comstock, 560 U.S. 126. (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Emerson, 231 Fed. Appx. 349, 352. (5th Cir. 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160, 1213. (11th Cir. 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Zehnter 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4700, *2–*3. (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollert, R. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes’s Theorem. Psychological Public Policy & Law, 12, 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung, C. R. (2010). The emerging criminal war on sex offenders. Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 45, 435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, E. (2007, April 26). Churches slam doors on sex offenders. Retrieved from Salon.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corey Rayburn Yung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yung, C.R. (2019). Civil Commitment of Sex Offenders. In: O’Donohue, W.T., Bromberg, D.S. (eds) Sexually Violent Predators: A Clinical Science Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics