Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Faceless Terrorist

Abstract

In 2010, I visited a friend in Moscow—let us call her Mehrangis—who is Tajik by nationality and Muslim by conviction. The latter identity is very important to her, and she regularly studies religious texts in order to live up to an imagined ideal of “Muslimness.” In 2008, Mehrangis travelled from the Central Asian post-Soviet republic of Tajikistan to join her husband (he holds a Russian passport but hails from the same village in Tajikistan), who works as a trader in a bazaar on the outskirts of Moscow. While we were sitting and talking in Mehrangis’s Moscow apartment about the events in her village, she shared a recent experience with me: her husband had found an article about the military events in their native village and gave it to her to read. The article, she explained, began by describing the actors in the conflict as “terrorists,” and she felt disgusted by the malice of these fighters, who to her were anything but Muslims. In the last paragraph, the names of the terrorists who had been killed were listed, and she found her cousin’s name amongst them. How could the person portrayed as a terrorist by both the press and the Tajik state also be seen as a mujahid fighter in certain Islamist circles and be her respected cousin all at the same time? Was this just a matter of perspective? Did each really refer to the same thing or person? What does it mean for an individual to experience his or her relation to a person simultaneously as cousin, as terrorist, and as mujahid? The relationship between linguistic terms and the things they purport to describe can be misleading, not just because it is only experiences that have a name that are then taken to exist, but also because concepts and percepts often do not operate on the same ontological and epistemological principles.

Chapter 1 introduces the reader to the phenomena of jihad, mujahid, shahid, terrorist and terrorism. This introduction is not exhaustive as its primary purpose is, first, to identify and discuss in a general manner the origin of these terms and, second, to outline how these terms link to Central Asia. The next chapters will not continue this discussion, but will turn instead to the experiences of these phenomena and their use as concepts to interpret events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the safety of the informants, I have kept most of their names anonymous. However, the names of religious authorities, Tajik intellectuals, and well-known people have been retained.

  2. 2.

    The study of the self as the experiential dimension of the individual who exercises choice within contingent circumstances of the lived world and the dispositions that are trained and learned, begins with Aristotle and has more recently been developed over several decades among social anthropologists. For this book, the study by Johan Rasanayagam (2011) is the most relevant. His conceptualization of morality as “transcendence” emphasizes the values and commitments that shape the self. “Experience is itself moral by being located in what I call moral sources” (Rasanayagam 2011, 14).” These are not sacred texts, norms, and rituals as systems or codes, but they “are the transcendent locations in relation to which experience is apprehended.” With this approach, Rasanayagam offers an explanation to the post-Soviet paradox that Muslims in Central Asia experience between restrictive political systems and the development of the moral self. His examination of experience introduces the relevance of quality and mediation of the term, so far primarily used as if it were neutral.

  3. 3.

    Consider, for example, the following excerpt from a speech made in Cairo by then US President Barack Obama on June 4, 2009: “I have come here [to Cairo] to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect. […] We have the power to make the world we seek, but only if we have the courage to make a new beginning, keeping in mind what has been written.” New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04obama.text.html; See also A Necessary Engagement: Reinventing America’s Relations with the Muslim World, by Emile Nakhleh (2009), former director of the CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program.

  4. 4.

    Ribāṭ was a fortification at the edge of the territory of Islam (dār al-islām) housing groups engaged in jihad from the eighth century onward.

  5. 5.

    Farhad Khosrokhavar (2005) provides a contemporary sociological interpretation of jihad and shahid with regard to developments in Iran and Europe. He explains that this is particularly important in Europe, where one deals with secular Muslim youth who re-Islamize only at a second stage and in opposition to their traditionally oriented Muslim parents.

  6. 6.

    I will not discuss the literature that treats jihad as a Muslim apocalypse, which (as much as it may be relevant for earlier periods) does not help understand contemporary jihad; on the contrary, it is a way to declare the Muslim Other as being “irrational and apolitical,” which does not meet the aims of today’s Muslim activists. For information on the Muslim apocalypse, see Cook (2011, 193–227).

  7. 7.

    Introductions to the different mazhab interpretations can be found in Peters (1976), Devji (2005), DeLong-Bas (2007), Boukra (2011).

  8. 8.

    John Heathershaw and David Montgomery (2014, 12) note that only two percent of the people recognized Qutb’s name in a survey carried out by them; thus, we should not overestimate his impact on people in Central Asia.

  9. 9.

    A selection of biographies of scholars who studied Arabic can be found in the book Central Asian Intellectuals on Islam (Roche ed. 2014).

  10. 10.

    See for instance the role of Mikul’skii in Tajikistan (Roche and Faizulloev 2014).

  11. 11.

    This is not unique to Central Asia. In fact, several scholars (Schmid and Jongman 1988; McFate 2005; Utvik 2011) have pointed out that the study of the Islamist movement suffers from a double-distancing: “the researcher tends, first, to remain unnecessarily removed from Islamic movements as the object of study and, second, to study those movements at a distance from the society in which they grow and in which they compete for support” (Utvik 2011, 141).

  12. 12.

    A full discussion of the IMU is outside the scope of this chapter. It should, however, be mentioned that the history of the IMU goes back to a popular movement in the Ferghana Valley that was ousted by the Uzbek regime and moved to Afghanistan. Little is known about the IMU, but it serves as the link between violent groups in Central Asia and a global terrorist group, a macro-narrative that will be discussed in Chap. 5.

  13. 13.

    For a discussion of the reasons for this conversion, ranging from Samanid missionary activity to political considerations, see Starr (2013, 308) and (Hamada 2001, 37).

  14. 14.

    Scholars in Tajikistan believe that these activists were Hindustani’s own students, but since the letters are anonymous this is not fully clear.

  15. 15.

    For a complete history of Damullo Hindustani (born as Muhammadjon Rustamov, 1892–1989), see: Babadjanov (2004a, b), Olimova (2000), Babajanov and Kamilov (2001) and Epkenhans (2010). Portions of the correspondence between Hindustani and the young activists can be found in the Appendix.

  16. 16.

    I thank Stéphane Dudoignon for drawing my attention to such crucial historical details.

  17. 17.

    Over the last decade, much literature on Salafism has been produced based on theological discussions, texts, and internet documents. For Central Asia, see Babadjanov (2004a, b); for the Arab and global context, see Lohlker (2000, 2009), Bunt (2003) and Gräf (2010).

  18. 18.

    Azzam was the main organizer of recruitment in the U.S. for the Afghan jihad under the protection of the CIA. The Palestinian joined the Muslim Brothers in 1967 and taught in different universities in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, and was particularly interested in recruiting youth for jihad. (Boukra 2011, 324–326). Regarding his life and jihadi activities, see Lohlker (2009, 56–61).

  19. 19.

    At the conference “Islam in Central Asia: Politics, Society, and Resistance” held on 24–25 November 2012 at the Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, Exeter University, as part of the Arab Centre for Research and Strategic Studies and Illegitimate Violence in Islamic Thought Project. I had an opportunity to talk to him afterwards about jihad literature in Tajikistan and the role al-Qaeda may have played.

  20. 20.

    For a discussion about how jihad influences kinship, see Chap. 8.

  21. 21.

    For the positioning of Tajik Salafi within this distinction, see Chap. 2.

  22. 22.

    All interviews were conducted in Tajik and translated by the author, unless otherwise noted.

  23. 23.

    Besides IS and ISIL, ISIS and DAESH have become common terms to speak about the Syrian and Iraqi Islamists. DAESH or DAISH is an abbreviation for the historical region of Iraq and Syria but dais (pronounced similarly) in Arabic is a pejorative word meaning suppress and daish is used for a fanatic or a person who forces his or her will onto others (Irshaid 2015).

  24. 24.

    A concise introduction to the topic with multiple examples can be found in Bock (2009).

  25. 25.

    These are excerpts from a speech President George W. Bush gave via satellite to Eastern European leaders and from a joint news conference with French President Jacques Chirac, printed by CNN.com for their strategic importance.

  26. 26.

    Bock (2009, 60) has noticed that it does not make sense to declare war on either terror or terrorism because one is an emotional condition and the other a strategy.

  27. 27.

    “You are either with us or against us,” November 6, 2001. CNN.com/U.S., September 22, 2001, 8.

  28. 28.

    In Chap. 5 I return to Stratfor, as it was one of the main think tanks to have reported on the 2010–2011 military interventions.

  29. 29.

    Jörg Becker (2016) provides a critical review of a media report on Afghanistan. The media established Islam and Muslims as the enemy per se.

  30. 30.

    See also Bergmann (2006). For an analysis of Britain’s role in the War on Terror, see Kettell (2011).

  31. 31.

    McFate (2005) argues that additional cultural knowledge is required to fight counterinsurgency operations and that this should be coming from ethnographers! However, the engagement of social anthropology for military purposes has been heavily criticized as an ethical issue: see the American Anthropological Association’s 2012 “Statement on Ethics.”

  32. 32.

    I will postpone addressing these works to the chapters where I discuss them in relation to my own material. Among others, these include Mariam Abou Zahab (2011) on Pakistan and Werner Schiffauer (2000) on Germany and the research of Carolin Görzig with the project “How ‘terrorists’ learn” at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle.

  33. 33.

    Gaidar Jamal, who was one of the founders of the all Soviet Union Islamic Revival Party, has survived the independence process in Russia without any trouble (Sibgatullina and Kemper 2017). Unlike the other sections of his party, he did not establish an Islamic party, but remained an independent scholar still much involved in the activities of religious opposition movements in Central Asia. His personal homepage provides material on political Islam, among other topics, including material about the IS. In October 2014, Jamal produced an article that was meant to provide insight into the “real life” of the IS. The article, Почему мы ничего не знаем об ISIS? (Why don’t we know anything about the ISIS?), blames biased reporting for producing an “incorrect picture.” The article was, however, soon removed from the website, just like the other pro-IS articles, and is now only available on external sites. Why did he feel the need to defend the IS at this time? While I do not have any proof, it coincides with an open recruitment in Moscow’s mosques that I could observe and—at least to an outsider—an impression that Russia’s leadership was if not promoting, then at least tolerating young men leaving for jihad in Syria at this specific period. The article had, however, already circulated among Tajik migrants in Russia.

  34. 34.

    “Die Macht des Terrorismus besteht darin, unsere Wahrnehmung zu beeinflussen, ihn stärker und gefährlicher erscheinen zu lassen als er eigentlich ist” (Bock 2009, 8).

  35. 35.

    According to Waldmann (2005), guerrilla campaigns differ from terrorism because they target security institutions and profit from popular backing in parts of the population, while terrorists have little backing within the population. Guerrilla warfare is waged to occupy space, terrorism the mind (17). However, “Be it a terrorist cell, militia, a guerrilla movement or a revolutionary army, all these organisations of violence tend to develop in the same way.” (1999, 71)

  36. 36.

    In an interview, the leader of the IRPT has reemphasized that they will continue their activities in a peaceful struggle (Khamidova 2016).

  37. 37.

    The International Crisis Group report (ICG 2011) provides a good overview of the conflict’s political dimension, though its analytical categories are problematic and feed into a “discourse of danger” (see Chap. 5).

  38. 38.

    To date, no picture of Mullo Abdullo has appeared either on the internet or in any newspapers. Even after having been killed twice (he was declared dead both in 2008 and again in 2011), he remains a ghostly figure, who serves to relate conflicts in the Qarategin Valley to al-Qaeda.

  39. 39.

    For a contextualized discussion of similar terms, see Rasanayagam (2011).

  40. 40.

    This has been discussed in social anthropology by distinguishing between scriptural Islam and everyday practices, between the literary Great Tradition and the Little Tradition or rural and folk tradition (Gellner 1995, 5, 80; Geertz 1968). However, such a clear distinction has been rejected as artificial and failing to capture processes and developments (see, for instance, Varisco 2005).

  41. 41.

    An interview on Tout-Monde posted on his website, http://www.edouardglissant.fr/.

  42. 42.

    See the interview in zeitenblick.de, http://www.zeitenblicke.de/2012/1/Interview/. Juneja’s interview can be read as a summary of the work of the scholars at the Heidelberg Cluster of Transcultural Studies in Heidelberg. For more than a decade these scholars have discussed and shaped the concept “transculturality.” This book is the result of my participation in this academic community and of discussing and reflecting on the term against my own empirical material.

  43. 43.

    For Glissant, history is not to be understood as structures in sequences of filiation, and time is not flowing (Coursil 1999, 89).

Bibliography by Author

  • Abashin, Sergei N. “Nation and Post-Colonialism in Central Asia: Twenty Years Later.” In Development in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Migration, Democratisation, and Inequality in the Post-Soviet Era, edited by S. Hohmann, C. Mouradian, S. Serrano, and J. Thorez, 80−97. London: I. B. Tauris, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullaev, Ravshan, Namoz Khotamov, and Tashmanbet Kenensariev. “Colonial Rule and Indigenous Responses, 1860–1917.” In Ferghana Valley: The Heart of Central Asia, edited by S. F. Starr, 69–93. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizoda, B. P., A. M. Abdukholikov, Q. I. Iskandarov, A. S. Niyozov, and H. Nuriddinov. Mukolamai Davlat va Din Dar Tojikiston [The dialogue between the state and religion in Tajikistan]. Dushanbe: Akademiyai Mukolama, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, Khizar Humayun. Emergence of Socialist Thought among North Indian Muslims (1917−1947). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babadjanov, B. M. “O fetvakh SADUM protiv ‘neislamskikh obychayev’” [About the fatwas of the SADUM against non-Islamic customs]. In Islam na postsovetskom prostranstve: vzglyad iznutri [Islam in post-Soviet space: A view from within], edited by A. Malashenko and M. B. Olcott, 170–184. Moscow, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Islam et activisme politique. Le cas Ouzbek.” Annales. Histoire, Science Sociales 59, no. 5−6 (2004a): 1139−1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Debates over Islam in Contemporary Uzbekistan: A View from Within.” In Devout Societies vs. Impious States? Transmitting Islamic Learning in Russia, Central Asia, and China through the Twentieth Century, edited by S. A. Dudoignon, 39−60. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2004b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babajanov, B. M., and M. Kamilov. “Muhammadjan Hindustani (1892–1989) and the Beginning of the ‘Great Schism’ among the Muslims of Uzbekistan.” In Islam in Politics in Russia and Central Asia (Early Eighteenth to Late Twentieth Centuries), edited by S. A. Dudoignon and H. Komatsu, 195−219. London: Kegan Paul, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babakhanov, S. Muftiy Ziyovuddinkhan Ibn Eshan Babakhan. Zhizn’ i deyatel’nost’ [The Mufti Ziyovuddinkhon Ibn Eshon Babakhan: His life and professional work]. Tashkent, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mona. Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. London: Routledge, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balci, Bayram. “Fethullah Gülen’s Missionary Schools in Central Asia and Their Role in the Spreading of Turkism and Islam.” Religion, State & Society 31, no. 2 (2003): 151−177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Jörg. Medien im Krieg—Krieg in den Medien. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Anna. “Geschlechterbilder und Gewaltdarstellungen in der westlichen Medienberichterstattung über den Afghanistan- und Irakkrieg.” In Geschlechterdiskurse zwischen Fiktion und Faktizität, edited by W. Ernst and U. Bohle, 119–134. Hamburg: Lit, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi K., ed. Nation and Narration. New York: Routledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 2004. First published 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Maurice. How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches to Cognition, Memory, and Literacy. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Andreas. Terrorismus. Cologne: UTB, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boukra, Liess. Le djihadisme: l’islam à l’épreuve de l’histoire. Paris: Bachari, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bönisch, Georg, and Georg Mascolo. “Terror. Kampf dem Kalifen.“ Der Spiegel 45 (2001): 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Edward M. “The Opening Up of Anthropology.” In Text, Play and Story: The Construction and Reconstruction of Self and Society, edited by E. M. Bruner, 1–16. Washington, DC: American Ethnological Society, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Experience and its Expression.” In The Anthropology of Experience, edited by V. Turner and E. Bruner, 3−33. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, Gary R. Islam in the Digital Age: E-Jihad, Online Fatwas, and Cyber Islamic Environments. London: Pluto, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, Georg W. “You are either with us or against us.” CNN.com November 6, 2001 – intro http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/11/06/gen.attack.on.terror/

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Christ, Saskia Dönitz, Daniel König, Şevket Küçükhüseyin, Margit Mersch, Britta Müller-Schauenburg, Ulrike Ritzerfeld, Christian Vogel, and Julia Zimmermann Transkulturelle Verflechtungen. Mediävistische Perspektiven. Göttingen: University of Göttingen Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Katerina, and Evgeny Dobrenko. Soviet Culture and Power: A History in Documents, 1917−1953. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari, Sharad and Katherine Verdery. “Thinking between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography after the Cold War.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 51, no. 1 (2009): 6–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, Édouard. “Julius Wellhausen und die ‘Kinder Adams.’ Die Aktualität der Orientalisten.” In Orient—Orientalistik—Orientalismus, edited by B. Schnepel, G. Brands, and H. Schönig, 43−70. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, Édouard, and Saskia Walentowitz. “Kinship Matters: Tribals, Cousins, and Citizens in Southwest Asia and Beyond.” Études rurales 2, no. 184 (2009): 217−248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, David. “Muslim Apocalyptic and Jihād.” In Islamic Political Thought and Governance. Volume 2: Later Theories and Styles of Leadership in the Sunni and Shi’i World, edited by Abdullah Saeed, 193−227. London: Routledge, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Jonathan. Countering Terrorism, Protecting Human Rights: A Manual. Warsaw: ODIHR, 2007. Accessed October 10, 2013. http://www.osce.org/odihr/29103?download=true.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursil, Jacques. “La Catégorie de la relation dans les essais d‘Edouard Glissant: Philosophie d’une poétique.” In Poétiques d’Edouard Glissant, edited by J. Chevrier 85–112, Paris: University Paris-Sorbonne, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Veena. Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. Remaking a World. Berkeley: University of California, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. Mille plateaux. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong-Bas, Natana J. Wahhabi Islam: From Revival and Reform to Global Jihad. London: I. B.Tauris, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devji, Faisal. Landscapes of the Jihad: Militancy, Morality, Modernity. London: C. Hurst & Company, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, Wilhelm. Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Vol. VII. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner. 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dudoignon, Stéphane A. “Status, Strategies, and Discourses of a Muslim ‘Clergy’ under a Christian Law: Polemics about the Collection of Zakât in Late Imperial Russia.” In Islam in Politics in Russia and Central Asia, edited by S. A. Dudoignon and H. Komatsu, 43−75. London: Kegan Paul, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “From Revival to Mutation: The Religious Personnel of Islam in Tajikistan, from De-Stalinization to Independence (1955–91).” In “Tajikistan: The Sources of Statehood,” special issue, Central Asian Survey 30, no. 1 (2011): 53−80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Michael. “The ‘Clash of Civilization’ and the ‘War on Terror’.” Parallel 20 (2006): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Julia. “The Politics of Security.” Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Working Papers 76, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Laws for Enemies.” In The Social Life of Anti-Terrorism Laws: The War on Terror and the Classifications of the ‘Dangerous Other’, edited by Julia Eckert, 7−31. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, Jeff. “A Soviet Jihad against Hitler: Ishan Babakhan Calls Central Asian Muslims to War.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 59, no. 1−2 (2016): 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epkenhans, Tim. “Muslims without Learning, Clergy without Faith: Institutions of Islamic Learning in the Republic of Tajikistan.” In Islamic Education in the Soviet Union and its Successor States, edited by M. Kemper, R. Motika, and S. Reichmuth, 313−348. London: Routledge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Origins of the Civil War in Tajikistan: Nationalism, Islamism and Violent Conflict in Post-Soviet Space. Lanham et al.: Lexington Books, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkinov, Aftandil. Praying For and Against the Tsar: Prayers and Sermons in Russian-Dominated Khiva and Tsarist Turkestan. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedtke, Gero. “Jadids, Young Bukharans, Communists, and the Bukharan Revolution: From an Ideological Debate in the Early Soviet Union.” In Muslim Culture in Russia and Central Asia from the 18th to the Early 20th Centuries. Vol. 2: Inter-Regional and Inter-Ethnic Relations, edited by A. v. Kügelgen, M. Kemper, and A. J. Frank, 483−512. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Naomi E., and Bradley J. Ruffle. “Religious Terrorism: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Economics of National Security, Working Paper Series 8, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragner, Bert. Zentralasien—Begriff und historischer Raum. In Zentralasien 13. Bis 20. Jahrhundert: Geschichte und Gesellschaft, edited by B. Fragner and A. Kappeler, 11−32. Wien: Promedia, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, François. Penser la révolution Française. Paris: Gallimard, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. Islam Observed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “‘From the Native’s Point of View’: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28, no. 1 (1974): 26−45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest. Muslim Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. First published 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glissant, Édouard. Poetics of Relation. Translated by Betsy Wing. Ann Arbor: Michigan University, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Traité du Tout-Monde. Poétique IV. Paris: Gallimard, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Voyage au pays du Tout-Monde. Patrick Chamoiseau explique le Tout-monde glissantien.” Édourd Glissant, une pensée archipélique. RFO, 1998. Accessed May 15, 2015. http://www.edouardglissant.fr/toutmonde.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräf, Bettina. Medien-Fatwas@Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Die Popularisierung des islamischen Rechts. ZMO-Studien 27. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Linda. “Living in a State of Fear.” In Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival, edited by C. Nordstrom and A. Robben, 105–127. Berkeley: University of Califorina, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamada, Masami. “Jihȃd, hijra et ‘devoir du sel’ dans l’histoire du Turkestan oriental.” Turcica 33 (2001): 35−61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hann, Chris, ed. Postsozialismus: Transformationsprozesse in Europa und Asien aus ethnologischer Perspektive. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, Ulf. “Macro-scenarios. Anthropology and the Debate over contemporary and Future Worlds.” Social Anthropology 11, no. 2 (2003): 69−187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Colette. Control and Subversion: Gender Relations in Tajikistan. London: Pluto, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathershaw, John. Post-Conflict Tajikistan: The Politics of Peacebuilding and the Emergence of Legitimate Order. London: Routledge, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathershaw, John, and Nick Megoran. “Contesting Danger: A New Agenda for Policy and Scholarship on Central Asia.” International Affairs 87, no. 3 (2011): 589−612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathershaw, John, and David Montgomery. The Myth of Post-Soviet Muslim Radicalization in the Central Asia Republics. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House), 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellbeck, Jochen, and Klaus Heller, eds. Autobiographical Practices in Russia. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Working, Struggling, Becoming: Stalin-Era Autobiographical Texts.” The Russian Review 60, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, Edward. A., and Gerry O’Sullivan. The Terrorism Industry: The Experts and Institutions That Shape Our View on Terror. New York: Pantheon, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, Melville J. The Myth of the Negro Past. Boston: Beacon 2005. First published 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitzler, Ronald, and Jo Reichertz. Irritierte Ordnung: Die gesellschaftliche Verarbeitung von Terror. Konstanz: UVK, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpp, Gerhard. Muslime in der Mark: Als Kriegsgefangene und Internierte in Wünsdorf und Zossen, 1914−1924. Berlin: Das Arabische Buch, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyland, Robert G. In God’s Path: The Arab Conquests and the Creation of an Islamic Empire. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. Being Alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Irshaid, Faisal. “Isis, Isil, IS or Daesh? One group, many names.” BBC Monitoring 2015. Accessed December 2, 2015. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-27994277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismailbekova, Aksana, and Emil Nasritdinov. “Transnational Religious Networks in Central Asia: Structure, Travel, and Culture of Kyrgyz Tablighi Jama’at.” Transational Social Review 2, no. 2 (2012): 177−195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Michael. “Introduction.” In Things As They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology, edited by M. Jackson, 1−50. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Existential Anthropology: Events, Exigencies, and Effects. Methodology and History in Anthropology 11. New York: Berghahn, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Lifewords: Essays in Existential Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard. “The Study of Terrorism: A New Approach.” Arches Quarterly 4, no. 6 (2010): 92−95.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William. Essays in Radical Empiricism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, Marloes. “Roaming about for God’s Sake: The Upsurge of the Tabligh Jama’at in The Gambia.” Journal of Religion in Africa 35, no. 4 (2005): 450−481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Searching for God: Young Gambians’ Conversion to the Tabligh Jama’at.” In New Perspectives on Islam in Senegal: Conversion, Migration, Wealth, Power, and Femininity, edited by M. Diouf and M. Leichtman, 139−168. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Battle of the Ages: Contests for Religious Authority in The Gambia.” In Being Young and Muslim: New Cultural Politics in the Global South and North, edited by L. Herrera and A. Bayat, 95−111. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juneja, Monica. “Understanding Transculturalism. Monica Juneja and Christian Kravagna in Conversation.” In Transcultural Modernisms, edited by M. Hill, C. Kravagna, and M. v. Osten, 22−33. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Kultur, Kulturtransfer und Grenzüberschreitungen. Joachim Eibach und Claudia Opitz im Gespräch mit Monica Juneja.“ zeitenblicke. 2012. Accessed October 15, 2014. http://www.zeitenblicke.de/2012/1/Interview/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabiri, Muhiddin. “Birth and Death of Democracy in Tajikistan: Memories and Reflections about Elections from 1990 until 2016.” CAP Papers 174. CAP, Central Asia Program, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, Deniz. “Post-Colonialism Compared: Potentials and Limitations in the Middle East and Central Asia.” International Journal Middle East Studies 34 (2002): 279−297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, Emmanuel. Political Islam in Central Asia: The Challenge of Hizb ut-Tahrir. London: Routledge, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kettell, Steven. New Labour and the New World Order. Britain’s Role in the War on Terror. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, Adeeb. The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Islam after Communism: Religion and Politics in Central Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamidov, Alisher. Countering the Call: The U.S., Hizb ut-Tahrir, and Religious Extremism in Central Asia. Washington, DC: The Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamidova, Parvina. Interview with Muhiddin Kabiri, leader of the Islamic Renaissance Party of Tajikistan in-exile. Central Asia Policy Brief 33, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, Farhad. Suicide Bombers: Allah’s New Martyrs. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, E. “S̲h̲ahīd.” In Encyclopedia of Islam, Second Edition, edited by P. Bearman et al. Brill Online. Accessed December 15, 2015. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/shahid-COM_1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, Stanley. “Marriage and the Terror War.” National Review, February 15, 2007. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/219989/marriage-and-terror-war-stanley-kurtz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, Stefan, ed. Feinde – Fremde – Freunde. Die Kreuzfahrer aus orientalischer Sicht. Orientwissenschaftliche Hefte 19. Halle (Salle): Orientwissenschaftliches Zentrum der Martin-Luther-Universität, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebau, Heike. “Hindostan (newspaper).” In 1914−18-online: International Encyclopedia of the First World War, edited by U. Daniel et al. Issued by the Freie Universität Berlin, 2014. Accessed 15 January 2016. https://doi.org/10.15463/ie1418.10468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohlker, Rüdiger. Islam im Internet. Hamburger Beiträge: Medien und politische Kommunikation—Naher Osten und islamische Welt 3. Hamburg: Deutsches Orient−Institut, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Dschihadismus: Materialien. Vienna: Facultas, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhmadbekova, Pokiza. “Tajikistan, EU and NATO Have Similar Vision of the Security Promotion.” Khovar.tj. National Information Agency of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, December 16, 2010. http://khovar.tj/eng/archive/1597-tajikistan-eu-and-nato-have-a-similar-vision-of-the-security-promotion.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Susan, and Andrew Clapham. International Human Rights Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrades, Addaia. “Anthropology and the ‘War on Terror’: Analysis of a Complex Relationship.” Sussex.ac.uk, 2006. Accessed January 6, 2015. https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=marrades.pdf&site=10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveeva, Anna. “EU Stakes in Central Asia.” Chaillot Papers 91. Paris: Institute for Security Studies, European Union, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, John J. “Introduction.” In Essays in Radical Empiricism, by W. James, xi-xlii. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFate, Montgomery. “Anthropology and Counterinsurgency: The Strange Story of Their Curious Relationship.” Military Review March−April (2005): 24−38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muminov, Ashirbek K. “Chami-damulla et son rôle dans la constitution d’un ‘Islam soviétiques’.” In Islam et politique en ex-URSS (Russie d’Europe et Asie centrale), edited by M. Laruelle and S. Peyrouse, 241−261. Paris: l’Harmattan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Fundamentalist Challenges to Local Islamic Traditions in Soviet and Post-Soviet Central Asia.” In Empire, Islam, and Politics in Central Eurasia, edited by T. Uyama, 249−262. Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muminov, Ashirbek, Uygun Gafurov, and Rinat Shigabdinov. “Islamic education in Uzbekistan.” In Islamic Education in the Soviet Union and its Successor States, edited by M. Kemper, R. Motika, and S. Reichmuth, 223−279. London: Routledge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, Andrea. Gendering 9/11: Medien, Macht und Geschlecht im Kontext des “War on Terror.” Bielefeld: transcript, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, Emile. A Necessary Engagement: Reinventing America’s Relations with the Muslim World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumkin, Vitaly V., ed. “Militant Islam in Central Asia: The Case of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan.” Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies, Working Paper Series. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Radical Islam in Central Asia: Between Pen and Rifle. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Islam in Central Asia: Religion and Politics.” In Central Asian Intellectuals on Islam: Between Scholarship, Politics, and Identity, edited by S. Roche, 81−108. ZMO-Studien 32. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neofotistos, V. P. “On the ISIL attacks in Western Europe and elsewhere.” Anthropology Today 32, no. 3 (2016): 1−2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourzhanov, Kirill, and Christian Bleuer. Tajikistan: A Political and Social History. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olcott, Martha B. “Roots of Radical Islam in Central Asia.” Carnegie Papers 77, 2007. http://carnegieendowment.org/2007/01/17/roots-of-radical-islam-in-central-asia/35w9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olimova, Saodat. “Islam and the Tajik Conflict.” In Islam and Central Asia, edited by R. Sagdeev and S. Eisenhower, 59−71. Washington, DC: Center for Political and Strategic Studies, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omelicheva, Mariya Y. “Counterterrorism and Human Rights: Explaining Differences in the Scope and Brutality of States’ Responses to Terrorism.” PhD diss., ETD Collection for Purdue University, 2007. Accessed March 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27235307_Counterterrorism_and_human_rights_Explaining_differences_in_the_scope_and_brutality_of_states'_responses_to_terrorism.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Counterterrorism Policies in Central Asia. London: Routledge, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, Fernando. Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Durham: Duke University, 1995. First published 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasczuk, Johanna. “Head of IS a ‘Mossad Puppet’ Says Tajik Salafi Leader.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, February 17, 2015. http://www.rferl.org/content/islamic-state-mossad-puppet-tajik-Salafi/26854638.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Rudolph. Islam and Colonialism: The Doctrine of Jihad in Modern History. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam: A Reader. Princeton: Markus Wiener, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piette, Albert. Anthropologie Existentiale. Paris: Editions Pétra, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Existence in the Details. Theory and Methodology in Existential Anthropology. Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanz, Carsten. Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwīs Konzept der Mitte bei der Unterscheidung zwischen Jihad und Terrorismus nach dem 11. September 2001. Bonner Islamwissenschaftliche Hefte 16. Bonn: EB-Verlag, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qutb, Sayyid. In the Shade of the Qur’an, Fi Zilal al-Quran. Edited and translated by Adil Salahi, seventeen volumes. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation, 1999. First published 1952–1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Milestones. USA: SIME journal (http://majalla.org), 2005. First published 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmatzoda, Mahmudjon. “Hojī Mirzo: Hazrati Ali gufta bud, az parchamhoi siyoh khonashin shaved.” [Hojī Mirzo: Hazrati Ali said, stay away (lit. stay at home) from black flags.] Ozodi.org, June 3, 2015. http://www.ozodi.org/content/hoji-mirzo-tajik-famous-cleric-about-isis-and-tajik-jihadists/27048933.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasanayagam, Johan. Islam in Post-Soviet Uzbekistan: The Morality of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reetz, Dietrich. “The ‘Faith Bureaucracy’ of the Tablighi Jama‘at: An Insight into Their System of Self-Organisation (Intizam).” In Colonialism, Modernity, and Religious Identities: Religious Reform Movements in South Asia, edited by G. Beckerlegge, 98−124. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Tablīghī Jamā‘at.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World, edited by J. L. Esposito, vol. 5, 293−299. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, Sophie. Domesticating Youth: Youth Bulges and Their Socio-political Implications in Tajikistan. New York: Berghahn, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, Sophie, and Muhiddin Faizulloev. “The Faithful Assistant: Muhiddin Faizulloev’s Life and Work in the Light of Russian Ethnography.” Fondation Maison sciences de l’homme Working Papers 85, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. London: Vintage, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Orientalism. New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2006. First published 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salimpur, Mirzoi. “Lider salafitov: ‘Islamskoe gosudarstvo’—dom Shaitana.” [The leader of salafists: The Islamic state is the house of the devil.] Rus.Ozodi. February 17, 2015. https://rus.ozodi.org/a/26853849.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Paolo. “The Tashkent ‘Ulamā’ and the Soviet State (1920−38): A Preliminary Research Note Based on NKVD Documents.” In Patterns of Transformation in and around Uzbekistan, edited by P. Sartori and T. Trevisani, 161−184. Reggio Emilia: Diabasis, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaebler, Birgit. “Civilizing Others: Global Modernity and the Local Boundaries (French/German/Ottoman and Arab) of Savagery.” In Globalization and the Muslim World: Culture, Religion, and Modernity, edited by B. Schaebler and L. Stenberg, 3−29. New York: Syracuse University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schielke, Samuli, and Liza Debevec, eds. Ordinary Lives and Grand Schemes: An Anthropology of Everyday Religion. New York: Berghahn, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffauer, Werner. Die Gottesmänner. Türkische Islamisten in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Nach dem Islamismus. Eine Ethnographie der islamischen Gemeinschaft Milli Görüs. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Alex P. “Frameworks for Conceptualising Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 16, no. 2 (2004): 197−221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Alex P., and Albert J. Jongman. Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, and Literature. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibgatullina, Gulnaz, and Michael Kemper, “Between Salafism and Eurasianism: Geidar Dzhemal and the Global Islamic Revolution in Russia.” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 28, no.2 (2017): 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, Andrew, ed. Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures. London: Frank Cass, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, Frederick, S. Lost Enlightenment: Central Asia's Golden Age from the Arab Conquest to Tamerlane. Princeton University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Scott. “The Myth of the End of Terrorism.” Stratfor, February 23, 2012. http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/myth-end-terrorism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, Marilyn. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Cambridge: Prickly Pear, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasar, Eren Murat. “The Official Madrasas of Soviet Uzbekistan.” Journal of The Economic and Social History of the Orient 59 (2016): 265−302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyan, Emil. “D̲j̲ihād.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, edited by P. Bearman et al. Brill Online, 2012. Accessed December 15, 2015. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/djihad-COM_0189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyama, Tomohiko. “Two attempts at Building a Qazaq State: The Revolt of 1916 and the Alash Movement.” In Islam in Politics in Russia and Central Asia (Early Eighteenth to Late Twentieth Centuries), edited by S. A. Dudoignon and H. Komatsu, 77−98. London: Kegan Paul, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utvik, Bjørn Olav. “Islamists from a Distance.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 43, no. 1 (2011): 141−143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varisco, Daniel M. Islam Obscured: The Rhetoric of Anthropological Representation. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, Claudia. The Odd Man Karakozov: Imperial Russia, Modernity, and the Birth of Terrorism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, Peter. “Societies in Civil War.” In The Dynamics of Violence: Processes of escalation and De-Escalation in Violent Group Conflicts, edited by G. Elwert, S. Feuchtwang and D. Neubert, 61–84. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Terrorismus: Provokation der Macht. Hamburg: Murmann, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, Wolfgang. “Transculturality – the Puzzling Form of Cultures Today.” In Spaces of Culture: City, Nation, World, edited by S. Lash and M. Featherstone 194−213. London: SAGE, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Leonard, Ami Pedahzur, and Sivan Hirsch-Hoefler. “The Challenges of Conceptualizing Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 16, no. 4 (2004): 777−794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorowicz, Quintan. “Anatomy of the Salafi Movement.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29, no. 3 (2006): 207–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurchak, Alexei. Everything Was Forever, Until it Was no More. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahab, Mariam Abou. “‘I Shall Be Waiting for You at the Door of Paradise’: The Pakistani Martyrs of the Lashkar-e Taiba (Army of the Pure).” In The Practice of War: Production, Reproduction, and Communication of Armed Violence, edited by A. Rao, M. Bollig, and M. Böck, 133−158. New York: Berghahn, 2011. First published 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography Without Author

  • “Tajikistan: The Changing Insurgent Threats” International Crisis Group. Crisisgroup.org, May 24, 2011. http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/central-asia/tajikistan/205-tajikistan-the-changing-insurgent-threats.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Text of President Bush’s Address to the Nation.” Washington Post, September 11, 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/11/AR2006091100775.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roche, S. (2019). Introduction. In: The Faceless Terrorist. Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03843-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03843-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03842-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03843-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics