Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foucault and the Human Subject of Science

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Ethics ((BRIEFSETHIC))

  • 431 Accesses

Abstract

In this book I have attempted to develop a critical approach to science, which I call “politics of truth,” and apply it to two cases, namely the scientific studies of left-handers and Icelanders. In way of conclusion, let me look back and draw together what I have done so far. Following the first chapter’s introduction, I discuss in the second chapter Foucault’s archaeology, somewhat as a prelude. I argued that Foucault only applied archaeology, as an explicit method, in The Order of Things, and, following a critical overview of Foucault’s Archaeology of Method, I concluded that archaeology is poorly served by discussing it purely on a theoretical level. Archaeology stands and falls with its application in concrete historical cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garðar Árnason .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Árnason, G. (2018). Conclusion. In: Foucault and the Human Subject of Science. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02813-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics