Skip to main content

Conclusion: Idealists and Realists

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
100 Years of NCVO and Voluntary Action

Abstract

In this chapter Davis Smith examines the successes and challenges of the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) over its first 100 years. In addition to the establishment of a number of household name charities such as Citizens’ Advice Bureaux and Age Concern, it suggests that the development of closer relations with the state resulted in growing awareness of the value of voluntary action, increased funding, and beneficial changes to public policy, tax, and charity law. Critics, however, suggest that success came at a price and argue that closer partnership with the state and increased professionalisation eroded the voluntary sector’s independence and distinctiveness. The chapter suggests that for the Council to retain its influence it needs to rediscover some of the federalism of its early years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kendall, 2000.

  2. 2.

    Alcock, 2016.

  3. 3.

    Interview with Perri 6, 30 April 2018.

  4. 4.

    Harris, 2016.

  5. 5.

    Interview with Perri 6, 30 April 2018.

  6. 6.

    The term was popularised in the 1930s by Elizabeth Macadam in her book of the same name. Macadam, 1934.

  7. 7.

    For example, Flanagan, 1991, p. 202, and Lowe, 1995, p. 373.

  8. 8.

    See, for example, Dahrendorf, 2001.

  9. 9.

    Alcock, 2016.

  10. 10.

    See, for example, Milbourne, 2013, and Rochester, 2013.

  11. 11.

    Interview with Sir Stuart Etherington, 25 July 2017.

  12. 12.

    Interview with Nicholas Deakin, 4 April 2017.

  13. 13.

    Interview with Baroness Prashar, 9 October 2017.

  14. 14.

    On claims that the sector has been co-opted by government, see Carmel and Harlock, 2008.

  15. 15.

    See, for example, Maloney et al., 1994.

  16. 16.

    Grant, 1999.

  17. 17.

    Lune and Oberstein, 2001.

  18. 18.

    For example, Craig et al., 2004, and McGhee et al, 2016.

  19. 19.

    Berridge and Mold, 2011, p. 117.

  20. 20.

    Rochester, 2013. Interview with Sir Stephen Bubb, 19 July 2017.

  21. 21.

    Interview with Bharat Mehta, 27 July 2017.

  22. 22.

    Marwick, 1964. See also Hilton, 2011, and Hilton et al., 2013.

  23. 23.

    Sampson, 1962, pp. 242–3.

  24. 24.

    Hilton et al., p. 16.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., p. 16.

  26. 26.

    On the growing aversion to experts, see Hay, 2007.

  27. 27.

    See, for example, Snape, 2015, on accusations of elitism during the inter-war years.

  28. 28.

    Burchardt, 2012.

  29. 29.

    For criticism of the work on the new estates, see Garside, 2004, and Olechnowicz, 1997. For criticism of the occupational club movement with the unemployed, see Flanagan, 1991.

  30. 30.

    Snape, 2015.

  31. 31.

    Harris, 1992, p. 126.

  32. 32.

    See, for example, Shapely, 2011.

  33. 33.

    The future Labour foreign secretary, David Miliband, also worked at the Council for a short time as a political analyst.

  34. 34.

    Rochester, 2013.

  35. 35.

    The dream was based on a book by Francis Gladstone, director of policy at the Council under Hinton. Gladstone, 1979.

  36. 36.

    Rochester, 2013.

  37. 37.

    Offer, 2003, p. 232.

  38. 38.

    Knapp, 1984.

  39. 39.

    Milbourne, 2013; Hemmings, 2017.

  40. 40.

    DiMaggio and Powell, 1983; and Billis, 2012.

  41. 41.

    See the various reports from the National Coalition for Independent Action, in particular, NCIA, 2014.

  42. 42.

    Taylor, 1996, p. 23.

  43. 43.

    Wilson, 1992.

  44. 44.

    Dartington, 1991.

  45. 45.

    See Chap. 8.

  46. 46.

    Maier et al., 2014.

  47. 47.

    Hemmings, 2017.

  48. 48.

    Ibid.

  49. 49.

    Berridge and Mold, 2011, p. 132.

  50. 50.

    Grant, 2014. Calder, 1992.

  51. 51.

    Wolfenden Committee, 1978.

  52. 52.

    Handy, 2015.

  53. 53.

    On the changing shape of civil society, see the final report of the inquiry into Civil Society Futures, 2018.

  54. 54.

    Handy, 2015, p. 24.

  55. 55.

    Hemmings, 2017, p. 62.

  56. 56.

    Interview with Margaret Bolton, 2 October 2017.

  57. 57.

    Harrison, 2003, p. 87.

  58. 58.

    Interview with Janet Morrison, 10 October 2017.

  59. 59.

    Interview with Dame Julia Cleverdon, 16 May 2018.

  60. 60.

    Interview with Nicholas Deakin, 4 April 2017.

  61. 61.

    Interview with Baroness Prashar, 9 October 2017.

  62. 62.

    Interview with Sir Stuart Etherington, 25 July 2017.

References

  • Alcock, P. (2016). From partnership to the Big Society: The third sector policy regime in the UK. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(2), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, V., & Mold, A. (2011). Professionalisation, new social movements and voluntary action in the 1960s and 1970s. In M. Hilton & J. McKay (Eds.), The ages of voluntarism: How we got to the Big Society (pp. 114–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press for British Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D. (Ed.). (2012). Hybrid organisations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, J. (2012). State and society in the English countryside: The rural community movement, 1918–39. Rural History, 23(1), 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, A. (1992). The people’s war: Britain 1939–1945. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, E., & Harlock, J. (2008). Instituting the “third sector” as a governable terrain: Partnership, procurement and performance in the UK. Policy and Politics, 36(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civil Society Futures. (2018). The story of our times: Shifting power, bridging divides, transforming society. London: Civil Society Futures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G., Taylor, M., & Parkes, T. (2004). Protest or partnership? The voluntary and community sectors in the policy process. Social Policy and Administration, 38(3), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (2001). Challenges to the voluntary sector. Arnold Goodman Lecture. London: Charities Aid Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dartington, T. (1991). Professional management in voluntary organisations: Some cautionary notes. In J. Batsleer, C. Cornforth, & R. Paton (Eds.), Issues in voluntary and non-profit management. Wokingham: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, R. (1991). ‘Parish-fed bastards’: A history of the politics of the unemployed in Britain, 1884–1939. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garside, P. (2004). Citizenship, civil society and quality of life: Sutton model dwellings estates, 1919–39. In R. Colls & R. Rodger (Eds.), Cities of ideas: Civil society and urban governance in Britain, 1800–2000 (pp. 258–282). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstone, F. (1979). Voluntary action in a changing world. London: Bedford Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. (1999). Pressure groups and British politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. (2014). Philanthropy and voluntary action in the First World War: Mobilizing charity. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (2015). The second curve: Thoughts on reinventing society. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1992). Political thought and the welfare state, 1870–1940: An intellectual framework for British social policy. Past and Present, 135, 116–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (2016). Where did we come from? The emergence and early development of voluntary sector studies in the UK. Voluntary Sector Review, 7(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. (2003). Civil society by accident? Paradoxes of voluntarism and pluralism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In J. Harris (Ed.), Civil society in British history: Ideas, identities, institutions (pp. 79–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, M. (2017). The constraints on voluntary sector voice in a period of continued austerity. Voluntary Sector Review, 8(1), 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, M. (2011). Politics is ordinary: Non-governmental organisations and political participation in contemporary Britain. Twentieth Century British History, 22(2), 230–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, M., McKay, J., Crowson, N., & Mouhot, J. (2013). The politics of expertise: How NGOs shaped modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990’s: Whys and wherefores. Policy and Politics, 28(4), 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. (1984). The economics of social care. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. (1995). Welfare’s moving frontier. Twentieth Century British History, 6(3), 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lune, H., & Oberstein, H. (2001). Embedded systems: The case of HIV/AIDS non-profit organisations in New York City. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam, E. (1934). The New Philanthropy: A study of the relations between the statutory and voluntary social services. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2014). Nonprofit organisations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W., Jordan, G., & McLaughlin, A. (1994). Interest groups and public policy: The insider/outsider model revisited. Journal of Public Policy, 14(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (1964). Middle opinion in the thirties: Planning progress and political “agreement”’. The English Historical Review, 79(311), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, D., Bennett, C., & Walker, S. (2016). The combination of “insider” and “outsider” strategies in VSO-government partnerships: The relationship between Refugee Action and the Home Office in the UK. Voluntary Sector Review, 7(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, L. (2013). Voluntary sector in transition: Hard times or new opportunities? Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coalition for Independent Action. (2014). NCIA inquiry into the future of voluntary services: Working paper 1: The position and role of national infrastructure bodies concerning the cuts to and privatisation of public services. London: NCIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, J. (2003). Idealism versus non-idealism: New light on social policy and voluntary action in Britain since 1880. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(2), 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olechnowicz, A. (1997). Working-class housing in England between the wars: The Becontree Estate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, C. (2013). Rediscovering voluntary action: The beat of a different drum. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A. (1962). Anatomy of Britain. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapely, P. (2011). Civil society, class and locality: Tenant groups in post-war Britain. In M. Hilton & J. McKay (Eds.), The ages of voluntarism: How we got to the Big Society (pp. 94–113). Oxford: Oxford University Press for British Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape, R. (2015). The new leisure, voluntarism and social reconstruction in inter-war Britain. Contemporary British History, 29(1), 51–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1996). What are the key influences on the work of voluntary agencies. In D. Billis & M. Harris (Eds.), Voluntary agencies: Challenges of organisation and management (pp. 13–28). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. (1992). The strategic challenges of cooperation and competition in British voluntary organisations: Towards the next century. Non-profit management and leadership, 2(3), 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenden Committee. (1978). The future of voluntary organisations: Report of the Wolfenden Committee. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Davis Smith .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davis Smith, J. (2019). Conclusion: Idealists and Realists. In: 100 Years of NCVO and Voluntary Action. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02774-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02774-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02773-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02774-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics