Abstract
The three datasets used in this study are the British Election Study (BES 2017), 2017 French Election Study (FES 2017), and the German Longitudinal Election Study (2017, GLES pre- and post-election cross-section + CSES). This project benefited from the timing of the three major European elections taking place within such close proximity and the collaboration of research scholars through the project called the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES). The core objectives of the CSES aligned perfectly with the paper’s objectives in a number of regards, particularly regarding the measure of populism, nativism, and anti-immigrant sentiment. Models are built firstly to measure how populism, nativism, and economic risk predict anti-immigrant sentiment. We then model support for the extreme right using two separate logistic regressions. In the first case, we model right-wing voting from the populism, nativism, and economic variables, absent the anti-immigrant sentiment, and in the second set of models, anti-immigrant sentiment is included. We adopted this approach to examine the net effect of standard theories of support for right-wing parties while controlling for the dominant out-group sentiment present in all three election contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2016). CSES Module 5: Democracy Divided? People, Politicians and the Politics of Populism. Last retrieved August 15, 2018, from http://www.cses.org/plancom/module5/CSES5_ContentSubcommittee_FinalReport.pdf.
Fieldhouse, E., Green, J., Evans, G., Schmitt, H., van der Eijk, C., Mellon, J., & Prosser, C. (2018, January). British Election Study, 2017: Face-to-Face Survey.
Riker, W. (1982). The Two-Party System and Duverger’s Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science. The American Political Science Review, 76(4), 753–766.
Roßteutscher, S., Schmitt-Beck, R., Schoen, H., Weßels, B., Wolf, C., Bieber, I., Stövsand, L.-C., Dietz, M., Scherer, P., Wagner, A., Melcher, R., & Giebler, H. (2018). Pre- and Post-election Cross Section (Cumulation) (GLES 2017). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6802 Data file Version 1.1.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12997.
Sauger, N. (2018). French Electoral Study 2017. Centre de données socio-politiques, Sciences Po/CNRS. Data file: fr.cdsp.ddi.FES2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daigle, D.T., Neulen, J., Hofeman, A. (2019). Methods. In: Populism, Nativism, and Economic Uncertainty. Europe in Crisis. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02435-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02435-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02434-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02435-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)