Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility

CSUM 2018: Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility pp 191–198Cite as

The Walkability of Thessaloniki: Citizens’ Perceptions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 879))

Abstract

This paper aims to assess the walkability of Thessaloniki, Greece, via individuals’ perceptions about the influence of the environmental factors of functionality, safety, aesthetic, and points of interest on their pedestrian behavior. The survey’s participants were 117 men and 152 women, from 15 to 78 years old, who came from 12 municipalities of the greater Thessaloniki area. The participants responded to a questionnaire which was based on valid and reliable previous respective questionnaires and walkability audits. The questionnaire was formulated on an online Internet platform and the data were collected in October 2017. The results revealed a variability of the assessment results among the different municipalities of Thessaloniki. Since the data were analyzed on the detailed level of postal codes, many differences were also found even between different postal code areas. Almost all areas were found to be insufficient in terms of functional characteristics. The suburban areas suffer from lack of pedestrians’ facilities, while urban areas from many obstacles on the existing facilities. In contrast, the proximity of points of interest was found to be very satisfactory. Regarding the safety of the pedestrians’ environment, it was perceived as of medium level whereas it was higher in the Thessaloniki city center. The pedestrians reported dysphoria from air pollution, mostly in neighborhoods with high density and vehicle traffic. Dirty pavements, lack of greenery, and ugly buildings bother citizens while walking. The findings are discussed with respect to practical implications in urban planning and people’s quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rastogi, R.: Promotion of non-motorized modes as a sustainable transportation option: policy and planning issues. Curr. Sci. 100(9), 1340–1348 (2011). http://www.jstor.org/stable/24076599

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krambeck, H.V.: The global walkability index. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2006). http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34409

  3. Gallin, N.: Quantifying pedestrian friendliness – guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service. Road Transp. Res. 10(1), 47–55 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sisiopiku, V.P., Byrd, J., Chittoor, A.: Application of Level-of-Service methods for evaluation of operations at pedestrian facilities. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2002, 117–124 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/2002-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lo, R.H.: Walkability: what is it? J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 2(2), 145–166 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903092867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Winters, Μ., Buehler, R., Götschi, T.: Policies to promote active travel: evidence from reviews of the literature. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 4(3), 278–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0148-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. NZ Transport Agency: Pedestrian planning and design guide. Land Transport New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aghaabbasi, M., Moeinaddini, M., Zaly Shah, M., Asadi-Shekari, Z.: A new assessment model to evaluate the microscale sidewalk design factors at the neighborhood level. J. Transp. Health 5, 97–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burden, D.: Street design guidelines for healthy neighborhoods. Transp. Res. E-Circ. E-C019(B-1), 1–15 (2000). http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec019/Ec019_b1.pdf

  11. Galanis, A., Eliou, N.: Development and implementation of an audit tool for the pedestrian built environment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 48, 3143–3152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mehta, V.: Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 1(3), 217–245 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802529480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moudon, A., Hess, P., Snyder, M., Stanilov, K.: Effects of site design and pedestrian travel in mixed-use, medium-density environments. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1578, 48–55 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3141/1578-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Jamrozik, K., Donovan, R.: Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc. Sci. Med. 56(8), 1693–1703 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sallis, J.F., Frank, L.D., Saelens, B.E., Kraft, M.K.: Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 38(4), 249–268 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mateo-Babiano, Ι.: Pedestrian’s needs matter: examining Manila’s walking environment. Transp. Policy 45, 107–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moudon, A., Lee, C.: Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments. Am. J. Health Promot. 18(1), 21–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen, W.A., Brown, B.B., Smith, K.R., Brewer, S.C., Amburgey, J.W., McIff, B.: Active transportation on a complete street: perceived and audited walkability correlates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14(9), 1014:1–1014:19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brownson, R.C., Hoehner, C.M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., Sallis, J.F.: Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am. J. Prev. Med. 36(4), S99.e12–S123.e12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Black, J.B., Chen, D.: Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am. J. Public Health 93(9), 1552–1558 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cerin, E., Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Frank, L.D.: Neighborhood environment walkability scale: validity and development of a short form. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 38(9), 1682–1691 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spittaels, H., Foster, C., Oppert, J.-M., Rutter, H., Oja, P., Sjöström, M., De Bourdeaudhuijr, I.: Assessment of environmental correlates of physical activity: development of a European questionnaire. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 6(39), 1–11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, C., Moudon, A.V.: The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 11(3), 204–215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oliver, L.N., Schuurman, Ν., Hall, Α.W.: Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands. Int. J. Health Geogr. 6(41), 1–11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pikora, T.J., Bull, L.F.C., Jamrozik, K., Knuiman, M., Giles-Corti, B., Donovan, R.J.: Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 23(3), 187–194 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. San Francisco Department of Public Health: The Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI): an assessment of the physical condition of streets and intersection. San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Millington, C., Ward Thompson, C., Rowe, D., Aspinall, P., Fitzsimons, C., Nelson, N., Mutrie, N.: Development of the Scottish Walkability Assessment Tool (SWAT). Health Place 15(2), 474–481 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Roxani Gkavra, Dimitrios Nalmpantis, Evangelos Genitsaris & Aristotelis Naniopoulos

Authors
  1. Roxani Gkavra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitrios Nalmpantis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evangelos Genitsaris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aristotelis Naniopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Nalmpantis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Traffic, Transportation and Logistics Laboratory (TTLog), University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    Eftihia G. Nathanail

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Traffic, Transportation and Logistics Laboratory (TTLog), University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    Ioannis D. Karakikes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gkavra, R., Nalmpantis, D., Genitsaris, E., Naniopoulos, A. (2019). The Walkability of Thessaloniki: Citizens’ Perceptions. In: Nathanail, E., Karakikes, I. (eds) Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility. CSUM 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 879. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02304-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02305-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation