Skip to main content

South Mountain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rocks and Rifles

Part of the book series: Advances in Military Geosciences ((AMG))

  • 428 Accesses

Abstract

The battle for South Mountain took place at three wind gaps through the Maryland portion of the Blue Ridge mountain range: Turner’s, Fox’s, and Crampton’s Gaps. The vastly outnumbered Confederate infantry and artillery attempted to hold the erosion-resistant quartzite ridges capping these mountain passes against Union Gen. McClellan’s aggressive maneuver to pass through the mountain range and attack Lee’s scattered divisions in the Great Valley. The Confederates were eventually pushed out of the gaps after a day’s fighting, providing Lee with critical time to assemble his army around Sharpsburg. The geology of the battlefield aided this resistance; the durability of the Weverton and Harpers Formations, composed of metamorphic quartzite and phyllite, provided high, easily defendable terrain, including large boulders and outcrops that provided natural breastworks for defense and obstacles for the attacking Union army.

“We marched on the top of the mountain keeping even with the enemy going over rocks and cliffs and some of the worst places I almost ever saw”

—diary of Calvin Leach, 1st North Carolina

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bassler, R. S. (1919). Cambrian and Ordovician: Maryland Geological Survey (408p). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaves, E. T., Edwards, J., Jr., & Glaser, J. D. (1968). Geological Map of Maryland, Maryland Geological Survey, Scale 1:250,000. Baltimore: Maryland Geologic Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlen, J., & Whisonant, R. C. (2008). Military Geology of Antietam Battlefield, Maryland, USA—Geology, terrain, and casualties. Geology Today, 24(1), 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means, J. (2015). Roadside geology of Maryland, Delaware, and Washington, D.C. (Roadside Geology Series, 346p). Missoula: Mountain Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strother, D. H. (1868). McClellan forces Turner’s Gap and Crampton’s Gap. Personal recollections of the war by a Virginian. Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, 36, 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenney, W. J. (1866). The military and naval history of the rebellion in the United States (843p). New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Catton, B. (1960). The American Heritage Picture History of the Civil War (630p). New York: American Heritage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debelius, M. (1996). Illustrated Atlas of the Civil War (320p). Alexandria: Time Life Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoptak, J. D. (2011). The Battle of South Mountain (224p). Arcadia Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (905p). New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosworthy, B. (2003). The bloody crucible of courage: Fighting methods and combat experience of the Civil War (753p). New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, J. M. (1996). Before Antietam: The Battle for South Mountain (464p). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hippensteel, S. (2019). South Mountain. In: Rocks and Rifles. Advances in Military Geosciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00877-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics