Skip to main content

Gettysburg

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rocks and Rifles

Part of the book series: Advances in Military Geosciences ((AMG))

Abstract

The July 1863 Battle of Gettysburg is the most studied and documented engagement from the Civil War by both historians and geologists. On a strategic level the geology of southern Pennsylvania favored the Confederate Army in almost all circumstances. Lee effectively used the Blue Ridge Mountains to shield his army from observation as he moved north and Cashtown and Carlisle Gaps allowed him to amalgamate his army relatively quickly north of the road junction of Gettysburg. However, with respect to tactics, geology strongly favored the Union defense during the 3 days of combat. Herr and McPherson Ridge were important defensive ridges during the first day’s fighting, and both are formed from resistant sandstone beds from the Heidlersburg Member of the Gettysburg Formation. Lee’s attacks during the second and third day of the battle, including the infamous “Pickett’s Charge”, were both conducted by infantry stationed on diabase dikes, assaulting across flat or gently undulating terrain underlain by softer sedimentary rock, against an enemy positioned on the higher diabase Gettysburg sill. This sill, composed from the York Haven Diabase, outcrops as several of the most well-known battle localities from the Civil War, including Devil’s Den and Little Round Top. Gettysburg was the largest and costliest battle during the war, and there is no other battleground where geology had as large of an influence on the outcome of the fight.

“The blood stood in puddles in some places on the rocks”

—Colonel William Oates of the 15th Alabama, after his unsuccessful attempt to take Little Round Top

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Guidebook for the 73rd Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists

  2. 2.

    Calculating the ballistic trajectory for Civil War artillery is immensely complicated and the profiles provided in Fig. 3.10 are estimates. Trajectories calculated with the following criteria: 12 Pounder Napoleon; muzzle velocity 439 m/s; solid shot weight 85,750 grains (12.25 pounds), shell 58,310 grains (8.34 pounds); Ballistic Coefficient: solid shot 0.10, shell 0.27; Diameter bore: shot 4.62 in., shell 4.52 in.; elevation 180 m; temperature 90 °F; wind negligible.

References

  • Brown, A. (1962). Geology and the Gettysburg Campaign: Pennsylvania Topographic and Geologic Survey Educational Series no. 5, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busey, J. W., & Martin, D. G. (2005). Regimental Strengths and Losses at Gettysburg (678p). Highstown: Longstreet House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuffey, R. J., Smith, R. C., II, Neubaum, J. C., Keen, R. C., Inners, J. D., & Neubaum, V. A. (2004). Lee vs. Meade at Gettysburg (July 1–3, 1863): The influence of topography and geology on command decisions and battlefield tactics. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 36(2), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuffey, R. J., Inners, J. D., Fleeger, G. M., Smith, R. C., II, Neubaum, J. C., Keen, R. C., Butts, L., Delano, H. L., Neubaum, V. A., & Howe, R. H. (2006). Geology of the Gettysburg battlefield: How Mesozoic events and processes impacted American history. In F. J. Pazzaglia (Ed.), Excursions in Geology and History: Field Trips in the Middle Atlantic States: Geological Society of America Field Guide (Vol. 8, pp. 1–16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faill, R. T. (2008). The Gettysburg basin. In G. M. Fleeger (Ed.), Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (pp. 1–7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleeger, G. M. (Ed). (2008). Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (177p).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guelzo, A. (2014). Gettysburg: The Last Invasion. Vintage Civil War Library (672p). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inners, J. D., Cuffey, R. J., Smith, R. C., II, Neubaum, J. C., Keen, R. C., Fleeger, G. M., Butts, L., Delano, H. L., Neubaum, V. A., & Howe, R. H. (2006). Rifts, diabase, and the topographic “fishhook”: Terrain and military geology of the Battle of Gettysburg—July 1–3, 1863 (revised ed., 111p). Pennsylvania Topographic and Geologic Survey Open-File Report 06–02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inners, J. D., & Cuffey R. J. (2008). STOP 16. Crest of Cemetery Ridge: Day-3 action (Pickett’s Charge, the “Bloody Angle,” and the “High Water Mark”) and the York Haven Diabase. In G. M. Fleeger (Ed.), Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (pp. 168–177).

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstreet, J. (1896). From Manassas to Appomattox: Memoirs of the American Civil War (385p). Philadelphia: J. P. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M. (2003). Hallowed ground: A walk at Gettysburg (141p). New York: Crown Journeys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, P. E., & Kent, D. V. (1999). Long-period Milankovitch cycles from the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic of eastern North America and their implications for calibration of the Early Mesozoic time-scale and the long-range behavior of the planets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences series, 357, 1761–1786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service. (2015). Retrieved December 9, 2017, from www.nps.gov/gett/learn/nature/geologicformations.htm

  • Sears, S. W. (2003). Gettysburg (640p). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C., II, & Keen, R. C. (2004). Regional rifts and the Battle of Gettysburg. Pennsylvania Geology, 34(3), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C., II, & Keen, R. C. (2008). Regional rifts and the Battle of Gettysburg. In G. M. Fleeger (Ed.), Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (pp. 48–53).

    Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, C. L. (2001). American Heritage History of the Battle of Gettysburg (320p). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry-Ehrlich, T. (2009). Gettysburg National Military Park and Eisenhower National Historic Site (50p). Geologic Resources Inventory Report, National Park Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudeau, N. A. (2002). Gettysburg: A testing of courage (720p). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, G. (1983). High Tide at Gettysburg (480p). Dayton, OH: Morningside House.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Adkin, M. (2008) The Gettysburg Companion: The Complete Guide to America’s Most Famous Battle (544p). London: Aurum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, B. (1960). The American Heritage Picture History of the Civil War (630p). New York: American Heritage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debelius, M. (1996). Illustrated Atlas of the Civil War (320p). Alexandria: Time Life Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (905p). New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosworthy, B. (2003). The bloody crucible of courage: Fighting methods and combat experience of the Civil War (753p). New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hippensteel, S. (2019). Gettysburg. In: Rocks and Rifles. Advances in Military Geosciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00877-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics