Skip to main content

Comparing Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches for Forecasting Binary Inference Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems Engineering in Context

Abstract

In this paper, we compare forecasts of the quality of inferences made by an inference enterprise generated from a frequentist perspective and a Bayesian perspective. An inference enterprise (IE) is an organizational entity that uses data, tools, people, and processes to make mission-focused inferences. When evaluating changes to an IE, the quality of the inferences that a new, hypothetical IE makes is uncertain. We can model quality or performance metric—such as recall, precision, and false-positive rate—uncertainty as probability distributions generated either through a frequentist approach or a Bayesian approach. In the frequentist approach, we run several experiments evaluating inference quality and fit a distribution to the results. In the Bayesian approach, we update prior performance beliefs with empirical results. We compare the two approaches in 18 forecast questions and score the two sets of forecasts against ground truth answers. Both approaches forecast similar performance means, but the frequentist approach systematically produces wider confidence intervals. Therefore, the frequentist approach outscores the Bayesian approach in metrics sensitive to interval width.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DT:

Decision tree classifier

f :

False-positive rate

FN:

False-negative count

FP:

False-positive count

IE:

Inference enterprise

IEM:

Inference enterprise model

p :

Precision

r :

Recall

SVM:

Support vector machine classifier

TN:

True negative count

TP:

True positive count

References

  1. Huang, E., Zaidi, A. K., & Laskey, K. B. (2018). Inference enterprise multimodeling for insider threat detection systems. In A. M. Madni, B. Boehm, R. G. Ghanem, D. Erwin, & M. J. Wheaton (Eds.), Disciplinary convergence in systems engineering research (pp. 175–186). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Turcotte, M. J., Kent, A. D., & Hash, C. (2017). Unified host and network data set. arXiv preprint arXiv:170807518.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Efron, B. (1986). Why isn’t everyone a Bayesian? The American Statistician, 40, 1–5.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Hagan, T. (2004). Dicing with the unknown. Significance, 1, 132–133.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lee, M., Lodewyckx, T., & Iverson, G. J. (2008). Bayesian versus frequentist inference. Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (pp. 181–207). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartholomew, D., & Bassett, E. (1966). A comparison of some bayesian and frequentist inferences. II. Biometrika, 53, 262–264.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffreys, H. (1998). The theory of probability. Oxford, UK: OUP.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Tiao, G. C., & Box, G. E. (1973). Some comments on “Bayes” estimators. The American Statistician, 27, 12–14.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009). A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Information Processing & Management, 45, 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goutte, C., & Gaussier, E. (2005). A probabilistic interpretation of precision, recall and F-score, with implication for evaluation. In European Conference on Information Retrieval (pp. 345–359). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research reported here was supported under IARPA contract 2016-16031400006. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean D. Vermillion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vermillion, S.D., Thomas, J.L., Brown, D.P., Buede, D.M. (2019). Comparing Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches for Forecasting Binary Inference Performance. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics