Skip to main content
  • 277 Accesses

Abstrait

L’adénose cervico-vaginale se caractérise par la présence anormale, de l’épithélium glandulaire endocervical au niveau du revêtement exocervical et sur le vagin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Coupez F (1986) L’adénose vaginale spontanée. Gynécologie 37: 47–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herbst A, Scully RE, Robboy SJ (1975) Effects of maternal DES ingestion on the female genital tract. Hospital Practice: 51–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herbst A, Hubby M, Azizi F, Makii NM (1981) Reproductive and gynaecologic surgical experience in DES exposed daughters. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141: 1019–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belaish J (1986) Effets de l’exposition in utero au DES. Gynecologie 37: 40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Minh HN (1986) Rappel embryologique du vagin. Gynécologie 37: 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lemaire B (1991) L’adénose cervico-vaginale post-DES. In: Blanc B, ed. Les enfants du distilbène. Arnette, Paris, p 11–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blanc B, Benmoura D (1993) Colposcopie et pathologie génitale. Arnette, Paris, p 75–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burke L, Antonioli D, Friedman EA (1981) Evolution of DES associated genital tract lesions. Obstet Gynecol 57: 79–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noller KL, Towsend E, Scully R (1983) Maturation of vaginal and cervical epithelium in women exposed in utero to DES (DESAD project). Am J Obstet Gynecol 146: 279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fowler NC, Schmidt G, Edechande et al. (1981) Risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among DES exposed wemen. Obstet Gynecol 158: 720–4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robboy SJ, Seyfelbein W, Barnes A (1981) Dysplasia and cytologic findings in 4589 young women enrolled in DESAD project. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140: 579–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robboy SJ, Noller KL, Brien PO et al. (1984) Increased incidence of cervical and vaginal dysplasia in 3980 DES exposed young women. JAMA 252: 2979–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hatch EE, Herbert A, Hoover RN et al. (2001) Incidence of squamous neoplasia of the cervix and vagina in women exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol (United States). Cancer Causes Control; 12: 837–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalland T (1982) Long-term effects on the immune system of an early life exposure to diethylstilbestrol. In: Hunt VR, Smith MK, Worth D, eds. Environment factors in human growth and development (Bandury report no 11). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, p 217–39

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holladay SD, Blaylock BL, Comment CE et al. (1993) Selective prothymocyte targeting by prenatal diethylstilbesterol exposure. Cell Immunol 152(1): 131–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ways SC, Mortola JF, Zvaifler NJ et al. (1987) Alterations in immune responsiveness in women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. Fertil Steril 48(2): 193–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Robboy SJ, Friedlander L, Herbst A (1976) Cytology of 575 young women with prenatal exposure to DES. Obstet Gynecol 48: 511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Richart RM, Fuy S, Reagan JW et al. (1977) The problem of squamous neoplasia in female DES progeny. Proceeding of symposium on DES 6: 45–61

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cole MP, Anderson D, Herbst A (1987) Rates and risks of DES related clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vaginal and cervix AN update. N Engl J Med 317(15): 514–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Newbold RR, Hanson RB, Jefferson WN et al. (1998) Increased tumors but uncompromised fertility in the female descendants of mice exposed developmentally to diethylstilbestrol. Carcinogenesis 19(9): 1655–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker BE, Kurth LA (1995) Multi-generational carcinogenesis from diethylstilbestrol investigated by blastocyst transfers in mice. Int J Cancer 61(2): 249–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Forsberg JG, Halling A (1992) Failure to detect a second-generation effect in female mice after neonatal treatment with an estrogen (diethylstilbestrol). Acta Anat 144(2): 103–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaufman RH, Adam E (2002) Findings in female offspring of women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Obstet Gynecol 99(2): 197–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sopena B (1989) L’adénose cervico-vaginale: l’une des conséquences de l’exposition in utero au DES. Contraception. Fertil Sexual 17: 461–4

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bellina JH, Ross LF, Hemmings et al. (1983) Carbon dioxide laser treatment of vaginal adenosis in DES exposed off spring: a proscpective study lasers. Laser Surg Med 3: 23–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blanc, B., Agostini, A. (2007). Adénose cervico-vaginale. In: Le Distilbène® trente ans après. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-73307-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-73307-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-73306-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-73307-9

Publish with us

Policies and ethics