Skip to main content

Maintenance Manpower Modeling: A Tool for Human Systems Integration Practitioners to Estimate Manpower, Personnel, and Training Requirements

  • Chapter
Simulation Methods for Reliability and Availability of Complex Systems

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 2059 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the maintenance manpower modeling capability in the Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (IMPRINT) that supports the Army’s unit of action. IMPRINT has been developed by the US Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Human Research and Engineering Directorate (HRED) in order to support the Army’s need to consider soldiers’ capabilities during the early phases of the weapon system acquisition process. The purpose of IMPRINT modeling is to consider soldiers’ performance as one element of the total system readiness equation. IMPRINT has been available since the mid 1990s, but the newest version includes significant advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adkins R, Dahl SG (1993) Final report for HARDMAN III, Version 4.0. Report E-482U, prepared for US Army Research Laboratory. Micro Analysis & Design, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adkins R, Dahl SG (1992) Front-end analysis for HARDMAN III in Windows. Report E-21512U, Prepared for Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Micro Analysis & Design, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alion Science and Technology (2008) Micro Saint Sharp version 3.0 User Manual. Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alion Science and Technology and ARL (2009) IMPRINT Pro V3.0 User Guide

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allender L et al. (1999) Evaluation of human performance under diverse conditions via modeling technology. In: Improved performance research integration tool (IMPRINT), user’s guide (Appendix A). US ARL, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allender L et al. (1995) Verification, validation, and accreditation of a soldier-system modeling tool. In: Proceedings of the 39th human factors and ergonomics society meeting, October 9–13, San Diego, CA. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.arl.army.mil/IMPRINT

  8. Archer R et al. (1987) Product 5: manpower determination aid. Final concept paper for US ARI. Micro Analysis & Design, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  9. Archer S, Adkins R (1999) IMPRINT user’s guide prepared for US Army Research Laboratory. Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  10. Archer SG, Allender L (2001) New Capabilities in the Army’s Human Performance Modeling Tool, Proceedings of the Military, Government, and Aerospace Simulation Conference. editor Michael Chinni, Seattle, WA, pp 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  11. Archer SG, Gosakan M et al. (2005) New capabilities of the army’s maintenance manpower modeling tool. J Int Test Eval Assoc 26(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bloechle W, Schunk D (2003) Micro Saint Sharp Simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, New Orleans, LA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dahl SG (1993) A study of unit measures of effectiveness to support unit MANPRINT. Final report prepared for Ft. Huachuca Field Unit. US Army Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dahl SG (1992) Integrating manpower, personnel and training factors into technology selection and design. In: Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Society. Micro Analysis & Design, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dahl et al. (1990) Final report for concepts on MPT estimation (Development of MANPRINT methods, Report E-17611U. Prepared for US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Micro Analysis & Design, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  16. Defense acquisition guidebook (DAG). Chapter 6, Human systems integration. https://acc.du.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=314774&lang=en-US

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fleishman EA, Quaintance MK (1984) Taxonomies of human performance: the description of human tasks. Academic Press, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  18. Booher HR (2003) Introduction: human systems integration. In: Handbook of human systems integration. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoagland DG et al. (2000) Representing goal-oriented human performance in constructive simulations: validation of a model performing complex time-critical-target missions. SIW conference. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, San Diego, CA, Paper Number 01S-SIW-137

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplan JD et al. (1989) MANPRINT methods. In: Aiding the development of manned system performance criteria. Technical report 852, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laughery KR et al. (2005) Modeling human performance in complex systems. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of industrial engineering, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laughery KR et al. (1988) A manpower determination aid based upon system performance requirements. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp 1060–1064

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lockett JF, Archer SG (2009) Impact of digital human modeling on military human-systems integration and impact of the military on digital human modeling. In: Duffy VG (ed) Handbook of digital human modeling – research for applied ergonomics and human factors engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  24. Manpower and personnel integration MANPRINT handbook, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G1. MANPRINT Directorate, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  25. http://www.manprint.army.mil/manprint/docs/MEMOS/skelton/manprintforthearmy.html

  26. Simpson J et al. (2006) IMPRINT output analysis final report. Technical report prepared by FSU-FAMU College of Engineering Simulation Modeling Group for MA&D and ARL-HRED, April. Tallahassee, FL

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wojciechowski JQ et al. (1999) Modeling human command and control performance sensor to shooter. Proceedings of human performance, situation awareness, and automation conference, Savannah, GA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gosakan, M., Murray, S. (2010). Maintenance Manpower Modeling: A Tool for Human Systems Integration Practitioners to Estimate Manpower, Personnel, and Training Requirements. In: Faulin, J., Juan, A., Martorell, S., Ramírez-Márquez, JE. (eds) Simulation Methods for Reliability and Availability of Complex Systems. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-213-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-213-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-212-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-213-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics