Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NASA Monographs in Systems and Software Engineering ((NASA))

  • 1304 Accesses

Abstract

For many, the greatest benefit of the Web is to allow a growing number of services to be accessed from offices and homes. Today’s Web grants direct access to financial, travel, commercial, and trading information at the same time that it facilitates buying and selling books, electronic equipment, stocks, bonds, and airline tickets, just to mention a few among myriad other options. The possibilities seem infinite, but the underlying Web technology falls short at a crucial point: there is no information about information. Any ordinary search will typically bring, together with the desired results, a large amount of worthless information. This situation, known to database experts as the “low precision, high recall” scenario, is hindering the usability of search engines. To ameliorate this situation, it is paramount to properly index Web resources, in other words, to add annotation elements that explain what the Web resources are about.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barabási, A-L. (2002) Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, T. (1997) Axioms of Web architecture: Metadata. Available at: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Metadata.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumbill, E. (2002) Finding friends with XML and RDF: The friend-of-a-friend vocabulary can make it easier to manage online communities. IBM Developer Works. Available at: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-foaf.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth, M.R. (1991) Knowledge interchange format. In: J. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall (Eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference (KR’91). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (1998) Metadata and the World Wide Web. In: Baca, M. (ed.) Metadata: Pathways to Digital Information. Getty Information Institute, pp. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland-Sweland, A. (1998) Defining metadata. In: Baca, M. (ed.) Metadata: Pathways to Digital Information. Getty Information Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, G.; Clay, T.; Allen, R. (2005) A metadata element set for project documentation. Science & Technology Libraries Journal, Vol. 25, Issue 4, pp. 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianella, R. (2001) Representing vCard Objects in RDF/XML. W3C Note 22 February 2001. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFLA (2006) Digital Libraries: Metadata Resources. Available at: http://www.ifla.org/II/metadata.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagoze, C. (1996) The Warwick Framework: A container architecture for diverse sets of metadata. D-Lib Magazine, July/August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuszek, C.; Cabral, J.; Witbrock, M.; Oliveira, J. (2006) An introduction to the syntax and content of Cyc. In: Proceedings of the 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium on Formalizing and Compiling Background Knowledge and Its Applications to Knowledge Representation and Question Answering. Stanford, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1995) WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38, Issue 11, pp. 39–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles, I., and Pease, A. (2001) Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Welty, C. and Smith, B. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2001), Ogunquit, Maine, October 17–19, 2001. (See also http://www.ontologyportal.org)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoening, J. (2003) Standard Upper Ontology Working Group (SUO WG). IEEE P1600.1, 2003. Available at: http://suo.ieee.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J.F. (1999) Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uschold, M.; King, M.; Moralee, S.; Zorgios, Y. (1998) The Enterprise ontology. In: Uschold. M. and Tate. A. (Eds) Special Issue on Putting Ontologies to Use. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Ontology Sources. In: Semantic Web: Concepts, Technologies and Applications. NASA Monographs in Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-710-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-710-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-581-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-710-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics