Skip to main content

Anesthetic Considerations and Management

  • Chapter
Robotic Urologic Surgery

Abstract

The advancement of surgery into the digital and computer-assisted era has generated a new amalgamation of known anesthetic challenges. This chapter is designed to provide both surgeons and anesthesiologists with a quick reference, guiding optimal peri-operative care in patients receiving robotic urologic surgery. In addition, information critical to ensuring patient safety when utilizing computer-assisted surgical techniques is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roizen MF, Fleisher LA. Anesthetic implications of concurrent diseases. In Miller, ed. Anesthesia. Philsdelphia: Elsevier; 2005:1028–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson WC, Benumof JL. Respiratory physiology and respiratory function during anesthesia. In Miller, ed. Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005:707.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stoelting RK, Dierdorf SF. Hypertension. In Anesthesia and Co-Existing Disease. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; New York: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yao FF. Hypertension. In Yao, Artusio, eds. Anesthesiology: Problem-Oriented Patient Management. Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven; 1998:328–330.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stoelting RK, Dierdorf SF. Endocrine Disease. In Anesthesia and Co-Existing Disease. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1993:339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirsch IB, Magill JB, Cryer PE, White PF. Perioperative management of surgical patients with diabetes mellitus. Anesthesiology 1991;74:364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alberti KGMM. Diabetes in surgery. Anesthesiology 1991;74:209–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoelting RK, Dierdorf SF. Ischemic heart disease. In Anesthesia and Co-Existing Disease. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; New York; 1993:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stellato TA. History of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1992;72:997–1002.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F. History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med 2000; 42:87–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Joris, JL. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In Miller, ed. Anesthesia. Philsdelphia: Elsevier: Philadelphia; 2005:2286.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ivankovich AD, Miletich DJ, Albrecht RF, et al. Cardiovascular effects of intraperitoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide insufflation and nitrous oxide in the dog. Anesthesiology 1975;42:281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johannsen G, Andersen M, Juhl B. The effects of general anaesthesia on the haemodynamic events during laparoscopy with CO2-insufflation. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1989;33:132.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baskin JJ, et al. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure as a complication of laparoscopic surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 1998;2:177–180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Joris JL. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In Miller, ed. Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005:2290–2292.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peterson HB, DeStefano F, Rubin GL, et al. Deaths attributable to tubal sterilization in the United States, 1977 to 1981. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146:131.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nishanian EV, Mets B. Anesthesia for robotic surgery. In Miller, ed. Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005:2562.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen AG, Prevedoros H, Kullman E, et al. Perioperative nitrous oxide does not influence recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1989;37:683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller RD, et al. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In Miller, ed. Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005:2285–2299.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nishanian EV, Mets B. Anesthesia for robotic surgery. In Miller, ed. Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005:2557–2569.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stoelting RK. Pharmacology & Physiology in Anesthetic Practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:183f, 184t-185t, 214–216.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Darzi SA, Munz Y. The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Annu Rev Med 2004; 55:223–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology 2005;66(suppl 5):101–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yerington, C.L., Nuechterlein, B. (2007). Anesthetic Considerations and Management. In: Patel, V.R. (eds) Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-704-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-704-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-545-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-704-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics