Skip to main content

Abstract

In transportation research, simulation technologies have acquired a huge relevance since they permit to reproduce, under controllable conditions, different scenarios with a growing degree of complexity. In this sense, a general trend can be anticipated here since it represents one of the backbone of this paper. The simulators of traffic scenario are enlarging the numbers of factors to be considered, from the sole link between vehicles and driving environment to a joint scenario in which drivers’ intentions, autonomous behaviours of different vehicles and adaptive technologies (providing ad-hoc reactions according to specific driving conditions) are all together considered and computed. Therefore, the more the complexity grows, the more the network of factors influencing the reliability of these scenarios becomes articulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balaban, C.D., Cohn, J.V., Redfern, M.S., Prinkey, J., Stripling, R. and Hoffer, M. (2004). Postural control as a probe for cognitive state: Exploiting human information processing to enhance performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baluja, S. (1994). Population-based incremental learning: A method for integrating genetic search based function optimisation and competitive learning. Technical Report CMU-CS-94-163. Cornegie Mellow University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertacchini, A., Minin, L., Pavan, P. and Montanari, R. (2006). Ergonomic steer by wire: Caratteristiche e modalità funzionale. Deliverable R5.1, MECTRON Laboratory, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, M.L. and Ceri, S. (1992). On intelligent and cooperative information systems: A workshop summary. International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 1(2), 249–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciabue, P.C. (2004). Guide to Applying Human Factors Methods— Reference Model of Cognition Chapter, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, A., Mandiau, R., Kolski, C., Heidet, A. and Kemeny, A. (1999). Traffic generation with the SCANeR© II simulator: Towards a multi-agent architecture. In Proceedings of DSC’99, Paris, France, pp. 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen, F. and Neunzig, D. (2002). Analysis of ACC and stop and go using the simulation tool PELOPS. Final Technical Report IKA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, K.R., Lippitt, C.E. and Forsythe, J.C. (2005). Modelling human recognition of vehicle-driving situations as a supervised machine learning task. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dols, J., Pardo, J., Breker, S., Arno, P., Bekiaris, E., Ruspa, C. and Francone, N. (2002). The TRAINER project: Experimental validation of a simulator for driver training. In Driving Simulation Conference, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, K. and Stone, P. (2004). Multiagent traffic management: A reservation-based intersection control mechanism. In The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, C.G., Paramore, B., Van Cott, H.P., Grey, S.M. and Corlett, E.N. (1987). Task analysis. In G. Salvendy (Ed.). Handbook of Human Factors. J Wiley, New York, pp. 370–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, E. (1988). Introductory overview. In E.L. Wiener, and D.C. Nagel (Eds.). Human Factors in Aviation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002). Final report of the esafety working group on road safety. Information Society Technologies, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrarini, C. (2005). Analisi comparata dell’usabilità di un software per la supervisione e il controllo dei processi industriali: il caso Moviconx. MS Thesis, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, K. (2000). Alternative design consistency rating methods for two-lane rural highways. FHWA Report RD-99-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. (2005). Towards a general theory of driver behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(3), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gipps, P.G. (1981). A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research, 15B, 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollu, A. (1995). Object Management Systems. PhD Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D. and Treiber, M. (1998). Jams, Waves and Clusters. Science, 282, 200–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoedemaeker, M., De Ridder, S. and Jahnsenn, W. (2002). Review of European human factors research on adaptive interface technologies for automobiles. TNO Report, TM-02-C031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. (1993). Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M. and Tomasevic, N. (2004). A driving simulator evaluation of enhanced road markings. In Proceedings of the Road Safety Research? Policing and Education Conference, Perth, Australia. Peer reviewed paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horberry, T. and May, J. (1994). SpaD Human Factors Study: Directory of Relevant Literature. Applied Vision Research Unit. University of Derby. UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Horberry, T., Regan, M. and Anderson, J. (2005). The possible safety benefits of enhanced road markings: A driving simulator evaluation. Transportation Research Part F, 9, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangwon, L.J. (2004). Longitudinal Driver Model and Collision Warning and Avoidance Algorithms Based on Human Driving Database. PhD Thesis. UMI 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlson, R. (2004). Evaluating driver distraction countermeasures. Master Thesis in Cognitive Science, Cognitive Science Study Program, Linköpings universitet, Sweden. Kemeny A (1993) A cooperative driving simulator. In Proceedings of the International Training Equipment Conference and Exhibition Conference (ITEC), London, pp. 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, T.C., Brook-Carter, N. and Kersloot, T. (2004). Distraction from multiple invehicle secondary tasks: Vehicle performance and mental workload implications. Ergonomics, 47, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, L., Mamei, M. and Zambonelli, F. (2004). Co-fields: Towards a unifying model for swarm intelligence. In Engineering Societies in the Agents World III: Third International Workshop (Vol. 2577, pp. 68–81). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, C.Y. and Peng, H. (2000). String stability analysis of adaptive cruise controlled vehicles. JSME International Journal Series C. 43(3), 671–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, E. and Rathi, A.K. (1997). Traffic simulation. In N.H. Gartner, C.J. Messer and A. Rathi (Eds.). Traffic Flow Theory (chapter 10). Federal Highway Administration and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstetten, D., Krautter, W., Grothkopp, B., Steffens, F. and Geutner, P. (2001). Using a driving simulator to perform a wizard-of-oz experiment on speech-controlled driver information systems. In Proceedings of the Human Centered Transportation Simulation Conference (HCTSC 2001), Iowa City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M.H. and van Winsum, W. (2000). Martens, M. H. and van Winsum, W. (1999). Measuring distraction: The peripheral detection task. Online paper. Available at www.nrd.nhtsa.dot..gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/welcome.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J.A. (1985). A critical view of driver behaviour models: What do we know, what should we do? In L. Evans and R. Schwing (Eds.). Human Behaviour and Traffic Safety. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 485–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. and Huang, Q. (2002). An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning systems. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC). Birmingham, AL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minin, L. (2005). Prototipazione virtuale nell’interazione uomo-macchina: Benchmark analysis e testcomparati per supportare la scelta dei software di prototipazione virtuale più adeguati a differenti tipologie di interfacce utente. MS Thesis, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neunzig, D., Breuer, K. and Ehmanns, D. (2002). Traffic and vehicle technologies. Assessment with simulator PELOPS. ISSE Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni, D. and Feng, C. (2002). A two-dimensional traffic simulation model. In Proceedings of the 7th Driving Simulation Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L. (1995). Safety effects of adaptive cruise controls in critical traffic situations. In Proceedings of The Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. pp. 1254–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, S. and Burns, P. (2000). Measuring distraction with a peripheral detection task. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Driver Distraction Internet Forum, on-line paper, available at http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Papers20006.htm#A6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossowski, S., Fernández, A., Serrano, J.M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.L., Belmonte, M.V., Hernández, J.Z., García-Serrano, A. and Maseda, J.M. (2004). Designing multiagent decision support system—The case of transportation management. Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, pp. 1470–1471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özgüner, F., Özgüner, U., Takeshita, O., Redmill, K., Liu, Y., Korkmaz, G., Dogan, A., Tokuda, K., Nakabayashi, S. and Shimizu, T. (2004). A simulation study of an intersection collision warning system. In Proceedings of the International workshop on ITS Telecommunications, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panou, M., Cacciabue, N., Cacciabue, P.C. and Bekiaris, A. (2005). From driver modelling to human machine interface personalisation. IFAC 16 th World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, A. and Liu, A. (1999). Modelling and prediction of human behavior. Neural Computation, 11, 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y. (1997). A Simulation Laboratory for Evaluation of Dynamic Traffic Management Systems. PhD Thesis at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recarte, M.A. and Nunes, L.M. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reece, D.A. and Shafer, S.A. (1988). An overview of the PHAROS traffic simulator. In Rothengater, J.A. and DeBruin, R.A. (Eds.). Road User Behavior: Theory and Practice. Van Gorcum, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, M.A. and Horberry, T. (2004). A driving simulator evaluation of enhanced road markings. In Proceedings of Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, M., Jermeland, J. and Severson, J. (2002). Instrumented vehicles and driving simulators. Gerontechnology, 1(4), 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci, D.D., Boer, E.R. and Liu, A. (2001). Toward an integrated model of driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Tranportation Research Record No. 1779, pp. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R.W., Reid, G.B., Gomez, R.L. and Rice, S. (1998). Modelling mental workload. Cognitive Technology, 3, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, F. (2003). Task analysis through cognitive archaeology. In D. Diaper, N. Stanton (Eds.). The Handbook of Task Analysis for HCI. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. and Veloso, M. (2000). Multiagent systems: A survey from machine learning perspective. Autonomous Robots, 8(3), 345–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukthankar, R., Hancock, J., Pomerleau, D. and Thorpe, C. (1996). A simulation and design system for tactical driving algorithms. In Proceedings of AI, Simulation and Planning in High Autonomy Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukthankar, R., Hancock, J. and Thorpe, C. (1998). Tactical level simulation for intelligent transportation systems. Journal on Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Special Issue on ITS, 27(9/11), 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukthankar, R., Pomerleau, D. and Thorpe, C. (1995). SHIVA: Simulated highways for intelligent vehicle algorithms. In Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (2002). Sampling information form the road environment. In R. Fuller, J.A. Santos (Eds.). Human Factors for Highway Engineers. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. and Hagenzieker, M.P. (1993). Visual search of traffic scenes: On the effect of location expectations. In A. Gale, I.D. Brown, C.M. Haslegrave and S.P. Taylor (Eds.). Vision in Vehicles (Vol. 4, pp. 149–158). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffin, D., Reymond, G., Kemeny, A. and Droulez, J. (2003). Influence of steering wheel torque feedback in a dynamic driving simulator. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference, North America, Deaborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Owechko, Y. and Zhang, J. (2004). Driver cognitive workload estimation: A data-driven perspective. In Proceedings of 77th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Owechko, Y. and Zhang, J. (2004). Learning-based driver workload estimation. In Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra, F.R.H. (1993). Efficiency in Work Behaviour: A Design Approach for Modern Tools. Delft University Press, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tango, F., Montanari, R., Marzani, S. (2007). Present and Future of Simulation Traffic Models. In: Cacciabue, P.C. (eds) Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-617-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-618-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics