Abstract
Motor learning is a complicated process resulting in the acquisition of new and, after practice, relatively permanent motor skills. There are three stages to motor learning. The first stage is called the cognitive stage and involves a person learning exactly what is required to perform a particular task and exactly how to perform that task correctly.1 In this stage of learning, feedback is essential if the motor task is to be reproduced precisely. The second stage involves “fine tuning” of the new skill. Mistakes are made less and less frequently until, finally, the task becomes automatic and does not require much attention during its execution, which is the third stage of skill acquisition.2 Although practice of the specific motor learning task is of prime importance, feedback is considered the next most important variable.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gentile A. Skill aquisition: action, movement and neuromotor processes. In: Carr J, Shepherd R, Gordon J, editors. Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems; 1987.
Kisner C, Colby L. Therapeutic exercise: Foundational concepts. In: Kisner C, Colby L, editors. Therapeutic exercise: Foundations and techniques. Philadelphia: FA Davis Co; 2002;3–33.
Nicholson D. Teaching psychomotor skills. In: Shepard KF, Jensen GM, editors. Handbook of teaching for physical therapists. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997:271.
McNevin N, Gabriele W, Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self control and dyad training on motor learning: Implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2000;80(4):373–385.
Kegel AH. Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1948;56:238–248.
Haslam J. Biofeedback for the assessment and reeducation of the pelvic floor musculature. In: Laycock J, Haslam J, editors. Therapeutic management of incontinence and pelvic pain. London: Springer-Verlag; 2002:75–81.
Dietz H, Clarke B. The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J. 2001(B);12(1):38–41.
Dietz H, Wilson P, Clarke B. The use of perineal ultrasound to quantify levator activity and teach pelvic floor muscle exercise. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:166–169.
Bo K, Larsen S, Oseid S, et al. Knowledge about and the ability to perform correct pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urinary stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 1988;7(7):261–262.
Bump RC, Hurst G, Fantl JA, et al. Assessment of Kegel pelvic muscle exercise performance after brief verbal instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(2):322–329.
Schüssler B. Radiological evaluation of the pelvic floor and viscera. In: Schüssler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S, editors. Pelvic floor reeducation: Principles and practice. London: Springer-Verlag; 1994:75–82.
Chiarelli P. Female urinary incontinence in Australia: prevalence and prevention in postpartum women [doctoral thesis]. Newcastle (Australia): University of Newcastle; 2001.
Chiarelli P, Cockburn J. Promoting urinary continence in women following delivery: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2002;324(25):1241–1247.
Chiarelli P, Brown W. Perineal elevation — the reliability testing of a new measure of pelvic floor muscle function. In: Continence Foundation of Australia 8th National Conference on Incontinence. Sydney: Continence Foundation of Australia; 1999.
Plevnik S. New method for testing and strengthening of pelvic floor muscles. In: 15th annual meeting of the International Continence Society. London: ICS; 1988:95–1049.
Basmajian. Muscles alive. Their functions revealed by electromyography. 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1974.
LeCraw D, Wolf S. Electromyographic biofeedback (EMGBF) for neuromuscular relaxation and reeducation. In: Gersh M, editor. Electrotherapy in rehabilitation. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 1993:291–327.
Peschers U, Gingelmaier A, Jundt K, et al. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength using four different techniques. Int Urogynecol J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:27–30.
Thompson J, Briffa K, Court S. The comparison between transperineal and transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of women performing pelvic floor exercises. In: Continence Foundation of Australia (CFA) 12th National Conference. Sydney: CFA; 2003:39.
Cardozo L. Detrusor instability. In: Stanton S, editor. Clinical gynaecologic urology. St. Louis: C V Mosby; 1984:193–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiarelli, P.E., Moore, K.H. (2008). Exercise, Feedback, and Biofeedback. In: Baessler, K., Burgio, K.L., Norton, P.A., Schüssler, B., Moore, K.H., Stanton, S.L. (eds) Pelvic Floor Re-education. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-505-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-505-9_19
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-968-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-505-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)