Skip to main content

Exercise, Feedback, and Biofeedback

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Re-education

Abstract

Motor learning is a complicated process resulting in the acquisition of new and, after practice, relatively permanent motor skills. There are three stages to motor learning. The first stage is called the cognitive stage and involves a person learning exactly what is required to perform a particular task and exactly how to perform that task correctly.1 In this stage of learning, feedback is essential if the motor task is to be reproduced precisely. The second stage involves “fine tuning” of the new skill. Mistakes are made less and less frequently until, finally, the task becomes automatic and does not require much attention during its execution, which is the third stage of skill acquisition.2 Although practice of the specific motor learning task is of prime importance, feedback is considered the next most important variable.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gentile A. Skill aquisition: action, movement and neuromotor processes. In: Carr J, Shepherd R, Gordon J, editors. Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kisner C, Colby L. Therapeutic exercise: Foundational concepts. In: Kisner C, Colby L, editors. Therapeutic exercise: Foundations and techniques. Philadelphia: FA Davis Co; 2002;3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson D. Teaching psychomotor skills. In: Shepard KF, Jensen GM, editors. Handbook of teaching for physical therapists. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997:271.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McNevin N, Gabriele W, Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self control and dyad training on motor learning: Implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2000;80(4):373–385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kegel AH. Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1948;56:238–248.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haslam J. Biofeedback for the assessment and reeducation of the pelvic floor musculature. In: Laycock J, Haslam J, editors. Therapeutic management of incontinence and pelvic pain. London: Springer-Verlag; 2002:75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz H, Clarke B. The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J. 2001(B);12(1):38–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz H, Wilson P, Clarke B. The use of perineal ultrasound to quantify levator activity and teach pelvic floor muscle exercise. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:166–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bo K, Larsen S, Oseid S, et al. Knowledge about and the ability to perform correct pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urinary stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 1988;7(7):261–262.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bump RC, Hurst G, Fantl JA, et al. Assessment of Kegel pelvic muscle exercise performance after brief verbal instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(2):322–329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schüssler B. Radiological evaluation of the pelvic floor and viscera. In: Schüssler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S, editors. Pelvic floor reeducation: Principles and practice. London: Springer-Verlag; 1994:75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chiarelli P. Female urinary incontinence in Australia: prevalence and prevention in postpartum women [doctoral thesis]. Newcastle (Australia): University of Newcastle; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chiarelli P, Cockburn J. Promoting urinary continence in women following delivery: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2002;324(25):1241–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiarelli P, Brown W. Perineal elevation — the reliability testing of a new measure of pelvic floor muscle function. In: Continence Foundation of Australia 8th National Conference on Incontinence. Sydney: Continence Foundation of Australia; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plevnik S. New method for testing and strengthening of pelvic floor muscles. In: 15th annual meeting of the International Continence Society. London: ICS; 1988:95–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Basmajian. Muscles alive. Their functions revealed by electromyography. 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  17. LeCraw D, Wolf S. Electromyographic biofeedback (EMGBF) for neuromuscular relaxation and reeducation. In: Gersh M, editor. Electrotherapy in rehabilitation. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 1993:291–327.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peschers U, Gingelmaier A, Jundt K, et al. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength using four different techniques. Int Urogynecol J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson J, Briffa K, Court S. The comparison between transperineal and transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of women performing pelvic floor exercises. In: Continence Foundation of Australia (CFA) 12th National Conference. Sydney: CFA; 2003:39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cardozo L. Detrusor instability. In: Stanton S, editor. Clinical gynaecologic urology. St. Louis: C V Mosby; 1984:193–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiarelli, P.E., Moore, K.H. (2008). Exercise, Feedback, and Biofeedback. In: Baessler, K., Burgio, K.L., Norton, P.A., Schüssler, B., Moore, K.H., Stanton, S.L. (eds) Pelvic Floor Re-education. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-505-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-505-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-968-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-505-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics