Skip to main content

Local Wound Treatment in Pressure Ulcer Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pressure Ulcers in the Aging Population

Part of the book series: Aging Medicine ((AGME,volume 1))

  • 2490 Accesses

Abstract

The specific treatment goals for a pressure ulcer involve a variety of modalities aimed at improving the local wound environment and promoting healing. A key component in pressure ulcer healing is maintaining a moist wound environment. Moisture occlusive dressings can be divided into broad categories of polymer films, polymer foams, hydrogels, hydrocolloids, alginates, and biomembranes. Advanced wound dressings are demonstrably more effective than traditional gauze dressings. Head-to-head comparison of various advanced dressings has not demonstrated any single superior product. Therefore, most local ulcer treatments should be chosen on the basis of specific wound characteristics, ease of use, and cost. Because of slow healing, a number of adjunctive modalities have been tried in the management of pressure ulcers. Few high-quality trials are available, but most trials have not produced remarkable benefits. Wound debridement is necessary for clinically infected wounds, but the usefulness of serial debridement is disputable. Surgical closure of a pressure ulcer depends on patient age and comorbid conditions, but in general has shown a high recurrence rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ferrell BA, Josephson K, Norvid P, Alcorn H. Pressure ulcers among patients admitted to home care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1165–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. New method for assessing epidermal wound healing. The effects of triamcinolone acetonide and polyethylene film occlusion. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;71:382–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolton L, Johnson C, van Rijswijk L. Occlusive dressings: therapeutic agents and effects on drug delivery. Clin Dermatol. 1992;9:573–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas DR. Issues and dilemmas in managing pressure ulcers. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56:M238–340.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley M, Cullum N, Nelson EA, et al. Systematic reviews of wound care management: dressings and topical agents used in the healing of chronic wounds. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(17 Part 2):1–135.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouza C, Saz Z, Munoz A, Amate J. Efficacy of advanced dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care. 2005;14:193–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sayag J, Meaume S, Bohbot S. Healing properties of calcium alginate dressings. J Wound Care. 1996;5(8):357–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Colin D, Kurring PA, Yvon C. Managing sloughy pressure sores. J Wound Care. 1996;5(10):444–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Graumlich JF, Blough LS, McLaughlin RG, et al. Healing pressure ulcers with collagen or hydrocolloid: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nisi G, Brandi C, Grimaldi L, et al. Use of a protease-modulating matrix in the treatment of pressure sores. Chir Ital. 2005;57(4):465–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeron HM, Krotzsch Gomez FE, Munoz REH. Pressure ulcers: a pilot study for treatment with collagen polyvinylpyrrolidone. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46(3):314–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas DR, Diebold MR, Eggemeyer LM. A controlled, randomized, comparative study of a radiant heat bandage on the healing of stage 3–4 pressure ulcers: a pilot study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005;6(1):46–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Price P, Bale S, Crook H, et al. The effect of a radiant heat dressing on pressure ulcers. J Wound Care. 2000;9(4):201–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kloth LC, Berman JE, Nett M, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effects of noncontact normothermic wound therapy on chronic full-thickness pressure ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002;15(6):270–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitney JD, Salvadalena G, Higa L, et al. Treatment of pressure ulcers with noncontact normothermic wound therapy: healing and warming effects. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2001;28(5):244–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollisaz MT, Khedmat H, Yari F. A randomized clinical trial comparing hydrocolloid, phenytoin and simple dressings for the treatment of pressure ulcers. BMC Dermatol. 2004;4(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rhodes RS, Heyneman CA, Culbertson VL, et al. Topical phenytoin treatment of stage II decubitus ulcers in the elderly. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(6):675–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas DR. Age-related changes in wound healing. Drugs Aging. 2001;18:607–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rees RS, Robson MC, Smiell JM, et al. Becaplermin gel in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7(3):141–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mustoe TA, Cutler NR, Allman RM, et al. A phase II study to evaluate recombinant platelet-derived growth factor-BB in the treatment of stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers. Arch Surg. 1994;129(2):213–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Robson MC, Phillips LG, Thomason A, et al. Recombinant human derived growth factor-BB for the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29:193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Robson MC, Phillips LG, Thomason A, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor BB for the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. Lancet. 1992;339:23–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robson MC, Phillips LG, Lawrence WT, et al. The safety and effect of topically applied recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor on the healing of chronic pressure sores. Ann Surg. 1992;216:401–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Payne WG, Ochs DE, Meltzer DD, Hill DP, Mannari RJ, Robson LE, Robson MC. Long-term outcome study of growth factor-treated pressure ulcers. Am J Surg. 2001;181(1):81–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. REGRANEX – becaplermin gel package insert. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Revised: 09/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scevola S, Nicoletti G, Brenta F, et al. Allogenic platelet gel in the treatment of pressure sores: a pilot study. Int Wound J. 2010;7(3):184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Landi F, Aloe L, Russo A, et al. Topical treatment with nerve growth factor for pressure ulcers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:635–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas DR. The promise of topical nerve growth factors in the healing of pressure ulcers. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:694–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Payne WG, Wright TE, Ochs D, et al. An exploratory study of dermal replacement therapy in the treatment of stage III pressure ulcers. J Appl Res. 2004;4(1):12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ubbink DT, Westerbos SJ, Evans D, et al. Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds. The Cochrane Wounds Group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD001898.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Eginton MT, Brown KR, Seabrook GR, Towne JB, Cambria RA. A prospective randomized evaluation of negative-pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17(6):645–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ford CN, Reinhard ER, Yeh D, et al. Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wanner MB, Schwarzl F, Strub B, et al. Vacuum-assisted wound closure for cheaper and more comfortable healing of pressure sores: a prospective study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37:28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ho CH, Powell HL, Collins JF, et al. Poor nutrition is a relative contraindication to negative pressure wound therapy for pressure ulcers: preliminary observations in patients with spinal cord injury. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010;23(11):508–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Comorosan S, Vasilco R, Arghiropol M, Paslaru L, Jieanu V, Stelea S. The effect of Diapulse therapy on the healing of decubitus ulcer. Rom J Physiol. 1993;30(1–2):41–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Salzberg CA, Cooper-Vastola SA, Perez F, Viehbeck MG, Byrne DW. The effects of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a randomized, double-blind study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995;41:42–4. 46, 48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Olyaee Manesh A, Flemming K, Cullum NA, Ravaghi H. Electromagnetic therapy for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD002930. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002930.pub3.

  38. Ahmad ET. High voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation: effect of treatment durations on healing of chronic pressure ulcers. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2008;2(3):1–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Adegoke BO, Badmos KA. Acceleration of pressure ulcer healing in spinal cord injured patients using interrupted direct current. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2001;30(3):195–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Houghton PE, Campbell KE, Fraser CH, et al. Electrical stimulation therapy increases rate of healing of pressure ulcers in community-dwelling people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):669–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McDiarmid T, Burns PN, Lewith GT, Machin D. Ultrasound in the treatment of pressure sores. Physiotherapy. 1985;71(2):66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  42. ter Riet G, Kessels AGH, Knipschild P. A randomized clinical trial of ultrasound in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Phys Ther. 1996;76(12):1301–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nussbaum EL, Biemann I, Mustard B. Comparison of ultrasound/ultraviolet-C and laser for treatment of pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 1994;74(9):812–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Akbari Sari A, Flemming K, Cullum NA, Wollina U. Therapeutic ultrasound for pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD001275. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001275.pub2.

  45. Jones KR, Fennie K. Factors influencing pressure ulcer healing in adults over 50: an exploratory study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007;8:378–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Thomas DR. Managing pressure ulcers: learning to give up cherished dogma. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007;8:347–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Constantine BE, Bolton LL. A wound model for ischemic ulcers in the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol Res. 1986;278:429–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Levinson DR. Medicare payments for surgical debridement services in 2004. May 2007: OEI-02-05-00390.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Alvarez OM, Fenandez-Obregon A, Rogers RS, et al. Chemical debridement of pressure ulcers: a prospective, randomized, comparative trial of collagenase and papain/urea formulations. Wounds. 2000;12:15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bradley M, Cullum N, Sheldon T. The debridement of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3:1–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pullen R, Popp R, Volkers P, et al. Prospective randomized double-blind study of the wound-debriding effects of collagenase and fibrinolysin/deoxyribonuclease in pressure ulcers. Age Ageing. 2002;31(2):126–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ågren MS, Strömberg HE. Topical treatment of pressure ulcers. A randomized comparative trial of Varidase and zinc oxide. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;19(1):97–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Palmieri B. Heterologous collagen in wound healing: a clinical study. Int J Tissue React. 1992;14(Suppl):21–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Colin D, Kurring PA, Quinlan D, Yvon C. Managing sloughy pressure sores. J Wound Care. 1996;5(10):444–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Thomas S, Fear M. Comparing two dressings for wound debridement. J Wound Care. 1993;2(5):272–4.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Parish LC, Collins E. Decubitus ulcers: a comparative study. Cutis. 1979;23(1):106–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lee LK, Ambrus JL. Collagenous therapy for decubitus ulcers. Geriatrics. 1975;30(5):91–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Muller E, van Leen MW, Bergemann R. Economic evaluation of collagenase-containing ointment and hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(12):1209–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Moberg S, Hoffman L, Grennert ML, Holst A. A randomized trial of cadexomer iodine in decubitus ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983;31(8):462–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Brown-Etris M, Fowler E, Papen J, Stanfield J, Harris A, Tintle T, et al. Comparison and evaluation of the performance characteristics, usability and effectiveness on wound healing of Transorbent versus DuoDerm CGF. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management. London: Macmillan Ltd; 1996;5:151–5.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Darkovich SL, Brown-Etris M, Spencer M. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1990;29:47–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mulder GD, Altman M, Seeley JE, Tintle T. Prospective randomized study of the efficacy of hydrogel, hydrocolloid, and saline solutionmoistened dressings on the management of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 1993;1(4):213–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gilead L, Mumcuoglu KY, Ingber A. The use of maggot debridement therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds in hospitalised and ambulatory patients. J Wound Care. 2012;21(2):78. 80, 82–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Evans GRD, Dufresne CR, Manson PN. Surgical correction of pressure ulcers in an urban center: is it efficacious? Adv Wound Care. 1994;7:40–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Disa JJ, Carlton JM, Goldberg NH. Efficacy of operative cure in pressure sore patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:272–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Goldberg NH. Outcomes in surgical intervention. Adv Wound Care. 1995;8:69–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Foster RD, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Hoffman WY. Ischial pressure sore coverage: a rationale for flap selection. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50:374–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Foster RD, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, et al. Flap selection as a determinant of success in pressure sore coverage. Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):868–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kierney PC, Engrav LH, Isik FF, et al. Results of 268 pressure sores in 158 patients managed jointly by plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(3):765–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yamamoto Y, Tsutsumida A, Murazumi M, et al. Long-term outcome of pressure sores treated with flap coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(5):1212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Goodman CM, Cohen V, Armenta A, et al. Evaluation of results and treatment variables for pressure ulcers in 48 veteran spinal cord injured patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:665–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tavakoli K, Rutkowski S, Cope C, et al. Recurrence rates of ischial sores in para- and tetraplegics treated with hamstring flaps: an 8-year study. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(6):476–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Schryvers OI, Stranc MF, Nance PW. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcers: 20-year experience. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12):1556–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Homma K, Murakami G, Fujioka H, Fujita T, Imai A, Ezoe K. Treatment of ischial pressure ulcers with a posteromedial thigh fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1990–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Siegler EL, Lavizzo-Mourey R. Management of stage III pressure ulcers in moderately demented nursing home residents. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:507–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Thomas M.D., F.A.C.P., A.G.S.F., G.S.A.F. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, D.R. (2014). Local Wound Treatment in Pressure Ulcer Management. In: Thomas, MD, D., Compton, MD, G. (eds) Pressure Ulcers in the Aging Population. Aging Medicine, vol 1. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-700-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-700-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-699-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-700-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics