Abstract
The ability to inhibit the activity of maternally stored gene products in Xenopus has led to numerous insights into early developmental mechanisms. Oocytes can be cultured and manipulated in vitro and then implanted into the body cavity of a host female to make them competent for fertilization. Here, we summarize the methods for obtaining, culturing, and fertilizing Xenopus oocytes, with the goal of inhibiting maternal gene function through antisense oligonucleotide-mediated mRNA knock-down. We describe a simplified technique for implanting donor oocytes into host females using intraperitoneal injection. Also, we present optimized methods for performing the host-transfer procedure with Xenopus tropicalis oocytes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsSpringer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
References
Bachvarova R, Davidson E (1966) Nuclear activation at the onset of amphibian gastrulation. J Exp Zool 163:285–295
Newport J, Kirschner M (1982) A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 30:687–696
Heasman J (2006) Patterning the early Xenopus embryo. Development 133:1205–1217
Dosch R, Wagner DS, Mintzer KA, Runke G, Wiemelt AP, Mullins MC (2004) Maternal control of vertebrate development before the midblastula transition: mutants from the zebrafish I. Dev Cell 6:771–780
Wagner DS, Dosch R, Mintzer KA, Wiemelt AP, Mullins MC (2004) Maternal control of development at the midblastula transition and beyond: mutants from the zebrafish II. Dev Cell 6:781–790
Hulstrand AM, Schneider PN, Houston DW (2010) The use of antisense oligonucleotides in Xenopus oocytes. Methods 51(1):75–81
Mir A, Heasman J (2008) How the mother can help: studying maternal Wnt signaling by anti-sense-mediated depletion of maternal mRNAs and the host transfer technique. Methods Mol Biol 469:417–429
Torpey N, Wylie CC, Heasman J (1992) Function of maternal cytokeratin in Xenopus development. Nature 357:413–415
Cazenave C, Chevrier M, Nguyen TT, Hélène C (1987) Rate of degradation of [alpha]- and [beta]-oligodeoxynucleotides in Xenopus oocytes. Implications for anti-messenger strategies. Nucleic Acids Res 15:10507–10521
Dash P, Lotan I, Knapp M, Kandel ER, Goelet P (1987) Selective elimination of mRNAs in vivo: complementary oligodeoxynucleotides promote RNA degradation by an RNase H-like activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:7896–7900
Brun R (1975) Oocyte maturation in vitro: contribution of the oviduct to total maturation in Xenopus laevis. Experientia 31:1275–1276
Holwill S, Heasman J, Crawley C, Wylie CC (1987) Axis and germ line deficiencies caused by u.v irradiation of Xenopus oocytes cultured in vitro. Development 100:735–743
Smith LD, Ecker RE, Subtelny S (1968) In vitro induction of physiological maturation in Rana pipiens oocytes removed from their ovarian follicles. Dev Biol 17:627–643
Kloc M, Miller M, Carrasco AE, Eastman E, Etkin L (1989) The maternal store of the xlgv7 mRNA in full-grown oocytes is not required for normal development in Xenopus. Development 107:899–907
Elinson R (1973) Fertilization of frog body cavity eggs enhanced by treatments affecting the vitelline coat. J Exp Zool 183:291–302
Amaya E, Kroll KL (1999) A method for generating transgenic frog embryos. Methods Mol Biol 97:393–414
Schorderet-Slatkine S, Drury KC (1973) Progesterone induced maturation in oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Appearance of a ‘maturation promoting factor’ in enucleated oocytes. Cell Differ 2:247–254
Rugh R (1935) Ovulation in the frog. II. Follicular rupture to fertilization. J Exp Zool 71:163–194
Dumont J (1972) Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol 136:153–179
Heasman J, Holwill S, Wylie CC (1991) Fertilization of cultured Xenopus oocytes and use in studies of maternally inherited molecules. Methods Cell Biol 36:213–230
Schneider, P.N., Hulstrand, A.M., and Houston, D.W. (2010). Fertilization of Xenopus oocytes using the host-transfer method. J Vis Exp, e1864.
Lindsay L, Peavy T, Lejano R, Hedrick J (2003) Cross-fertilization and structural comparison of egg extracellular matrix glycoproteins from Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 136:343–352
Heasman J, Kofron M, Wylie C (2000) Beta-catenin signaling activity dissected in the early Xenopus embryo: a novel antisense approach. Dev Biol 222:124–134
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grant GM083999 (DWH) and The University of Iowa (DWH).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Olson, D.J., Hulstrand, A.M., Houston, D.W. (2012). Maternal mRNA Knock-down Studies: Antisense Experiments Using the Host-Transfer Technique in Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis . In: HOPPLER, S., Vize, P. (eds) Xenopus Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 917. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-992-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-992-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-991-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-992-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols