Skip to main content

Protein Separations in Microfluidic Chips

  • Protocol
The Protein Protocols Handbook

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

  • 433 Accesses

Abstract

Identifying protein structure, function, and expression level under varying environmental conditions in cells is an important activity in most life science research and pharmaceutical discovery. Determining the molecular weight and purity of protein samples is routinely done in laboratories using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacryamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) in the last few decades (1, 2). This process is highly manual and takes many hours to prepare the gel, run the samples, stain and destain the protein fractions, capture the gel image, and analyze the image to determine the protein sizes against a ladder. With commercially available precast gel, the first step of the process is becoming simpler and less messy, but overall it is still a relatively slow and tedious procedure. In large-scale protein processing operations and proteomics research laboratories, protein analysis often is a bottleneck in the workflow. Over the last 10 years capillary gel electrophoresis-SDS (SDS-CGE) is being increasingly used for analysis of therapeutic proteins. Compared to SDS-PAGE, SDS-CGE offers advantages of on-column detection, improved quantitation and resolution, and automation. However, SDS-CGE is limited by low sensitivity, throughput, and reliability. In the past several years, microfluidic-based assay for sizing, quantitiation, and purity assessment of proteins are also finding rapid adoption. The benefits in integration, fast separation, automation, and ease of use offered by microfluidics address the limitations of SDS-PAGE and SDS-CGE, and have proven to be a faster and easier alternative to the traditional SDS-PAGE or SDS-CGE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shapiro, A.L., Vinuela, E., Maizel, J.V. Jr. (1967) Molecular weight estimation of polypeptide chains by electrophoresis in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 28, 815–820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber, K. and Osborn, M.J. (1969) The Reliability of Molecular Weight Determinations by Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4406–4412.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bousse, L. Mouradian, S., Minella, A., Lee, H., William, K., and Dubrow, R. (2001) Protein sizing on a microchip. Anal. Chem. 73, 1207–1212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, D.E., Perkins, T.T. and Chu, S. (1996) Dynamical scaling of DNA diffusion coefficients. Macromolecules 29, 1372–1373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynolds, J.A. and Tanford, C. (1970) The gross conformation of protein sodium sodecyl sulfate complex. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 5161–5165.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, X. H. and Chen, S. H. (1990) The structure and thermodynamics of protein-SDS complexes in solution and the mechanism of their transport in gel electrophoresis proecess. Chem. Phys. 149, 129–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Narenberg, R., Kliger, J., Horn, D. (1999) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 38, 1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Viovy, J.-L. (2000) Electrophoresis of DNA and other polyelectrolytes: physical mechanisms. Rev. Modern Phys. 72, 813–872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sala-Solano, O.,Tomlinson, B., Du, S., Parker, M., Strahan, A., and Ma, S. (2006) Optimization and Validation of a Quantitative Capillary Electrophoresis Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Method for Quality Control and Stability Monitoring of Monoclonal Antibodies. Anal. Chem. 78, 6583–6594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uthayakumaran, S., Listiohadi, Y., Baratta, M., Batey, I.L., Wrigley, C.W. (2006) J. Cereal Sci., 44, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ben Abda, O., Rhazi, L., Fathollahi, B., Mejri, S., and Aussenac T. (2007) High throughput microfluidic system for separation and quantification of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits, AACC International Annual Meeting, October 7–10, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Molho, J.I., Park, C., Price, K., Phan, H., Simeonov, A., Mouradian, S. and Spaid, M.A. (2004) Ultrasensitive protein sizing using integrated isotachophoresis - gel electrophoresis,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences (Northrup, M.A. ed.), Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mouradian, S. (2002) Lab-on-a-chip: applications in proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6, 51–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Chow, A.W., Fathollahi, B. (2009). Protein Separations in Microfluidic Chips. In: Walker, J.M. (eds) The Protein Protocols Handbook. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-198-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-198-7_38

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-474-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-198-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics