Skip to main content

Abstract

Grading and differentiation are the terms used for the pathological classification of tumors. Grading of the tumor is a method to express the biological features and aggressiveness of the tumor. Conversely, the term differentiation is used to reflect the degree of tumor resemblance to its nonmalignant counterpart.

WHO has proposed a more scientific and clinically related tumor-based classification in 2000. The WHO classification suggests that neuroendocrine neoplasms are potentially malignant and consequently should be staged according to a site-specific staging system.

The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed the first methodical classification of neuroendocrine tumors. Currently, there are a number of other systems available to classify NETs, including NANET (North American NET Society) and ENET (European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society) in addition to the most recent version of WHO classification (2010). These novel systems are notable in that they consider the clinicopathological site-specific differences when classifying a case of NET. Also, unlike previous versions of them, these systems consider a neuroendocrine tumor as a potentially malignant neoplasm.

Overall there is a general consensus between these systems with only small differences between NANET and ENET. These differences regard especially the staging systems for pancreatic and appendicular NETs. Most systems use the cell proliferative rate to classify the tumor as low, intermediate, or high grade, In addition to histopathological features, functionality of a neuroendocrine tumor should also be considered. Functional status of a tumor is clinically and may be prognostically important; however, grade and stage are the factors that usually determine the prognosis and the therapeutic approach for a certain NET.

In this chapter we review the most common, currently available, classification systems, and, when needed, we discuss the differences between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kizilgul M, Delibasi T. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (gep-nets). Transl Gastrointest Cancer. 2014;4:39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Capelli P, Fassan M, Scarpa A. Pathology – grading and staging of gep-nets. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;26:705–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strosberg JR, Coppola D, Klimstra DS, Phan AT, Kulke MH, Wiseman GA, Kvols LK, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. The nanets consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated (high-grade) extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Pancreas. 2010;39:799–800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Park CH, Chung JW, Jang SJ, Chung MJ, Bang S, Park SW, Song SY, Chung JB, Park JY. Clinical features and outcomes of primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:1306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Almeida MQ, Stratakis CA. Solid tumors associated with multiple endocrine neoplasias. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010;203:30–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vinik AI, Woltering EA, Warner RR, Caplin M, O’Dorisio TM, Wiseman GA, Coppola D, Go VL, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Nanets consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor. Pancreas. 2010;39:713–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Niederle MB, Hackl M, Kaserer K, Niederle B. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the who and european neuroendocrine tumour society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17:909–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson O, Van Cutsem E, Delle Fave G, Yao JC, Pavel ME, McNicol AM, Sevilla Garcia MI, Knapp WH, Kelestimur F, Sauvanet A, Pauwels S, Kwekkeboom DJ, Caplin M, Frascati Consensus C, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Poorly differentiated carcinomas of the foregut (gastric, duodenal and pancreatic). Neuroendocrinology. 2006;84:212–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strosberg JR, Weber JM, Feldman M, Coppola D, Meredith K, Kvols LK. Prognostic validity of the American Joint Committee on cancer staging classification for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol (Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology). 2013;31:420–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorbye H, Strosberg J, Baudin E, Klimstra DS, Yao JC. Gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Cancer. 2014;120:2814–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, Albarello L, Boninsegna L, Buchler MW, Capella C, Caplin M, Couvelard A, Doglioni C, Delle Fave G, Fischer L, Fusai G, de Herder WW, Jann H, Komminoth P, de Krijger RR, La Rosa S, Luong TV, Pape U, Perren A, Ruszniewski P, Scarpa A, Schmitt A, Solcia E, Wiedenmann B. Tnm staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:764–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamaguchi T, Fujimori T, Tomita S, Ichikawa K, Mitomi H, Ohno K, Shida Y, Kato H. Clinical validation of the gastrointestinal net grading system: Ki67 index criteria of the who 2010 classification is appropriate to predict metastasis or recurrence. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E, Rindi G, Kos-Kudla B, Knigge U, Sasano H, Tomassetti P, Salazar R, Ruszniewski P, Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. Enets consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:74–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lairmore TC, Quinn CE, Martinez MJ. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: molecular pathogenesis and current surgical management. Transl Gastrointest Cancer. 2013;3:29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Falconi M, Plockinger U, Kwekkeboom DJ, Manfredi R, Korner M, Kvols L, Pape UF, Ricke J, Goretzki PE, Wildi S, Steinmuller T, Oberg K, Scoazec JY, Frascati Consensus C, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Well-differentiated pancreatic nonfunctioning tumors/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;84:196–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Falconi M, Bartsch DK, Eriksson B, Kloppel G, Lopes JM, O’Connor JM, Salazar R, Taal BG, Vullierme MP, O’Toole D, Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. Enets consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: well-differentiated pancreatic non-functioning tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:120–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahlman H, Nilsson O, McNicol AM, Ruszniewski P, Niederle B, Ricke J, Jensen R, Kos-Kudla B, Oberg K, O’Connor JM, Pavel ME, Vullierme MP, Frascati Consensus Conference participants. Poorly-differentiated endocrine carcinomas of midgut and hindgut origin. Neuroendocrinology. 2008;87:40–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schott M, Kloppel G, Raffel A, Saleh A, Knoefel WT, Scherbaum WA. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:305–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulke MH, Anthony LB, Bushnell DL, de Herder WW, Goldsmith SJ, Klimstra DS, Marx SJ, Pasieka JL, Pommier RF, Yao JC, Jensen RT, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Nanets treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas. Pancreas. 2010;39:735–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen RT, Cadiot G, Brandi ML, de Herder WW, Kaltsas G, Komminoth P, Scoazec JY, Salazar R, Sauvanet A, Kianmanesh R, Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. Enets consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: functional pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:98–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang LH, Shia J, Soslow RA, Dhall D, Wong WD, O’Reilly E, Qin J, Paty P, Weiser MR, Guillem J, Temple L, Sobin LH, Klimstra DS. Pathologic classification and clinical behavior of the spectrum of goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1429–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pape UF, Perren A, Niederle B, Gross D, Gress T, Costa F, Arnold R, Denecke T, Plockinger U, Salazar R, Grossman A, Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. Enets consensus guidelines for the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms from the jejuno-ileum and the appendix including goblet cell carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:135–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Neuroendocrine tumors of the thyroid gland. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115(Suppl):S56–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boudreaux JP, Klimstra DS, Hassan MM, Woltering EA, Jensen RT, Goldsmith SJ, Nutting C, Bushnell DL, Caplin ME, Yao JC, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. The nanets consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the jejunum, ileum, appendix, and cecum. Pancreas. 2010;39:753–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fenoglio-Preiser CM. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine/neuroectodermal tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115(Suppl):S79–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anthony LB, Strosberg JR, Klimstra DS, Maples WJ, O’Dorisio TM, Warner RR, Wiseman GA, Benson AB, Benson 3rd AB, Pommier RF, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. The nanets consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (nets): well-differentiated nets of the distal colon and rectum. Pancreas. 2010;39:767–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Phan AT, Oberg K, Choi J, Harrison Jr LH, Hassan MM, Strosberg JR, Krenning EP, Kocha W, Woltering EA, Maples WJ, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Nanets consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the thorax (includes lung and thymus). Pancreas. 2010;39:784–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen H, Sippel RS, O’Dorisio MS, Vinik AI, Lloyd RV, Pacak K, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. The North American neuroendocrine tumor society consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, and medullary thyroid cancer. Pancreas. 2010;39:775–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson LD. Pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland scaled score (pass) to separate benign from malignant neoplasms: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 100 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:551–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barakat MT, Meeran K, Bloom SR. Neuroendocrine tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004;11:1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wick MR. Neuroendocrine neoplasia. Current concepts. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113:331–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Abbreviations

NEN Neuroendocrine neoplasm

GI-NENs Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms

NET Neuroendocrine tumor

NEC Neuroendocrine carcinoma

GEP-NETs Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PNET Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

MANEC Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma

SCNEC Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

WHO World Health organization

NANET North American Neuroendocrine Society

ENET European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society

NSE Neuron-specific enolase

CgA Chromogranin

Syn Synaptophysin

HPF High-power field

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Coppola MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seydafkan, S., Coppola, D. (2016). Neuroendocrine Tumor Classification Systems: Grading. In: Nasir, A., Coppola, D. (eds) Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review of Pathology, Molecular and Therapeutic Advances. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3426-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3426-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3424-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3426-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics