Skip to main content

The Rorschach Inkblot Method: Theory

  • Chapter
Rorschach Assessment of Adolescents

Part of the book series: Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development ((ARAD))

Abstract

The chapter discusses the theoretical assumptions that responses to the Rorschach inkblots (a) reflect how people deal with decision-making and problem-solving tasks and (b) reveal underlying thoughts and feelings that are projected onto the external stimulus (the inkblot). In this regard, the discussion explores four psychodynamic perspectives for interpreting Rorschach responses of adolescents. These include ego psychology, object relations theory, self psychology and relational psychoanalysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aron, L. (1992). Interpretation as expression of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2, 475–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asari, T., Koniski, S., Jimura, K., Chikazoe, J., Nakamura, N., & Miyashita, Y. (2010). Amygdalar modulation of frontotemporal connectivity during the inkblot test. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 2, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry, F. D. (1995). Character. In B. E. Moore & B. D. Fine (Eds.), Psychoanalysis: The major concepts (Ch. 16) (pp. 196–208). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. (1997). Relational Psychoanalysis: A historical background. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51(2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J. (1990). The Rorschach: A test of perception or an evaluation of representation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3), 396–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J. (1991). A cognitive morphology of psychopathology. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 449–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J., Auerbach, J. S., & Levy, K. N. (1997). Mental representations in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. Review of General Psychology, 1, 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J., Ford, R. Q., Berman, W., Cook, B., & Meyer, R. (1988). The assessment of change during the intensive treatment of borderline and schizophrenic young adults. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5, 127–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bram, A. D. (2010). The relevance of the Rorschach and patient–examiner relationship in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 91–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucci, W. (1985). Dual coding: A cognitive model for psychoanalysis research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33, 571–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E. (1974). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Basic foundations and principles of interpretation 4th ed., Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E., & Erdberg, P. (2005). The Rorschach: A comprehensive System (Interpretation 3rd ed., Vol. 2). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E., & Weiner, I. B. (1995). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Assessment of children and adolescents 2nd ed., Vol. 3). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1996). Playing with reality: Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 217–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. M. (1995). Classical and relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 12, 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giromini, L., Porcelli, P., Viglione, D. J., Parolin, L., & Pineda, J. A. (2010). The feeling of movement: EEG evidence for mirroring activity during the observations of static, ambiguous stimuli in the Rorschach cards. Biological Psychology, 85, 233–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, S., & Shanker, S. (2007). The developmental pathways leading to pattern recognition, joint attention, language, and cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, L. (1999). Assessment of playfulness: Hermann Rorschach meets D. W. Winnicott. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72, 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1939). Psychoanalysis and the concept of health. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 20, 308–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huprich, S. K., & Greenberg, R. P. (2003). Advances in the assessment of object relations. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 665–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimura, K., Konishi, S., Asari, T., & Miyashita, Y. (2009). Involvement of medial Prefrontal cortex in emotion during feedback presentation. NeuroReport, 20, 886–890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. NY: Aronson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiger, J. H. (1992). A conceptual critique of the EA:es Comparison in the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 4, 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1930). The importance of symbol formation in the development of the ego. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 11, 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York, NY: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H., & Elson, M. (1987). The Kohut seminars on self psychology and psychotherapy with adolescents and young adults. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kris, E. (1934). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leichtman, M. (1996). The nature of the Rorschach task. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 478–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, P. M. (1998). Psychoanalytic perspectives on the Rorschach. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, N. (1994). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 548–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (1988). The intrapsychic and the interpersonal: Different theories, different domains, or historical artifacts. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 8, 472–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (2000). Relationality from attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A., & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam, G. G., & Malti, T. (2010). Ego development. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), Corsini’s encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 549–552). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (1986). The matrix of the mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (1989). Playing, dreaming, and interpreting experience: Comments on potential space. In M. Fromm & B. Smith (Eds.), The facilitating environment: Clinical applications of Winnicott’s theory (pp. 255–278). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, C. G. (2000). A relational interpretation of the Rorschach color determinants. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 426–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PDM Task Force. (2006). Psychodynamic diagnostic manual. Silver Spring, MD:Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peebles-Kleiger, M. J. (2002). Elaboration of some sequence analysis strategies: Examples and guidelines for level of confidence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, F. (1988). The four psychologies of psychoanalysis and their place in clinical work. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36, 571–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D. (1967). The theoretical implications of diagnostic testing procedures. In M. Gill (Ed.), Collected papers of David Rapaport (pp. 334–356). New York: Basic Books (Original work published 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D., Gill, M., & Schafer, R. (1968). Diagnostic psychological testing (Rev. ed. edited by R. R. Holt). New York, NY: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H. (1921/1942). Psychodiagnostics: A diagnostic test based on perception. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber (Original work published 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachtel, E. G. (1967). Experiential qualities of the Rorschach Ink Blots. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 31, 4–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachtel, E. G. (2001). Experiential foundations of Rorschach’s test. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing: Theory and application. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (2009). Relational trauma and the developing right brain: An interface of psychoanalytic self psychology and neuroscience. In W. J. Coburn & N. VanDerHeide (Eds.), Self and systems: Exploration in contemporary self psychology (pp. 189–203). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. (1956). Color response and perceptual passivity. Journal of Projective Techniques, 20, 52–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. L. (1999). Self psychology and diagnostic assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. L. (2006). Disorders of the self: A personality-guided approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. L. (1990). Potential space and the Rorschach: Application of object relations theory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 756–767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. B. (1985). Some controversies regarding constuctivism and psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 21, 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, G., & Healey, B. J. (1990). Projective assessment of object relations: A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Assessment, 2, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, A. (1991). Where’s the beef? Putting personality back into personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 130–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibon-Czopp, S. (2012). Applying psychodynamic developmental assessment to explore mental functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1259–1266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tibon-Czopp, S., Appel, L., & Zeligman, R. (2015). Assessing personality patterns of functioning in a decision-making ambiguous task: The Rorschach Reality-Fantasy Scale (RFS-2). Group Decision and Negotiation, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urist, J. (1977). The Rorschach test and the assessment of object relations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viglione, D. J. (1990). Severe disturbance or trauma-induced adaptive reaction: A Rorschach child case study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 280–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viglione, D. J., Perry, W., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). Refinements in the Rorschach Ego Impairment Index incorporating the Human Representational Variable. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 149–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, I. B. (1986). Conceptual and empirical perspectives on the Rorschach assessment of psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 472–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, I. B. (2003). Principles of Rorschach interpretation (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, I. B., & Greene, R. L. (2008). Handbook of personality assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (1991). Social cognition and object relations. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 429–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tibon-Czopp, S., Weiner, I.B. (2016). The Rorschach Inkblot Method: Theory. In: Rorschach Assessment of Adolescents. Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3151-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics