Skip to main content

Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications: Life Cycle Analysis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology
  • 375 Accesses

Introduction

The global electric vehicle (EV) fleet grew from 0.18 million vehicles in 2012 [1] to more than 3 million vehicles in 2017 [2]. Depending on the global EV deployment outlook, the fleet is expected to reach 130 million to 228 million EVs by 2030 owing to existing and announced policies encouraging EV adoption worldwide and continued battery technology improvements to increase performance and reduce cost [2]. In 2017, the electric vehicle initiative (EVI) launched the EV30@30 campaign, of which the aim is for EVs to reach 30% of the share of total vehicle sales by 2030 in all EVI member countries. As of September 2018, 11 countries – which collectively have accounted for 72% of 2017 global EV sales – had joined the campaign, along with 19 organizations and companies [3].

The unprecedented endorsement for EVs all over the world arises from EV’s potential to meet the world’s increasing mobility needs without contributing additional damage to the environment and to society [4,5,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Argonne:

Argonne National Laboratory

BMS:

Battery management system

BOM:

Bill of material

CO2e:

CO2 equivalent

EV:

Electric vehicle

EVI:

Electric vehicle initiative

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

GREET:

Greenhous Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation

LCA:

Life cycle analysis

LCI:

Life cycle inventory

LCO:

LiCoO2

LFP:

LiFePO4

LIB:

Lithium-ion battery

LMO:

LiMn2O4

NCA:

LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2

NMC:

LiNi1 − x − yMnxCoyO2

NMC111:

LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2

NMP:

N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone

Bibliography

  1. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2016) Global EV outlook 2016. Available at https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Global_EV_Outlook_2016.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2018

  2. IEA (2018) Global EV outlook 2018. Available at https://webstore.iea.org/global-ev-outlook-2018. Accessed 9 Dec 2018

  3. EVI (Electric Vehicle Initiative) (2018) EV30@30 campaign. Available at https://www.iea.org/media/topics/transport/3030CampaignDocumentFinal.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2018

  4. Notter DA, Gauch M, Widmer R, Wäger P, Stamp A, Zah R, Althaus H-J (2010) Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 44:6550–6556. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903729a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, Strømman AH (2013) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer C, Hofer J, Althaus H-J, Del Duce A, Simons A (2015) The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework. Appl Energy 157:871–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn JB, Gaines L, Kelly JC, James C, Gallagher KG (2014) The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling’s role in its reduction. Energy Environ Sci 8:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE03029J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elgowainy A, Han J, Ward J, Joseck F, Gohlke D, Lindauer A, Ramsden T, Biddy M, Alexander M, Barnhart S, Sutherland I, Verduzco L, Wallington TJ (2016) Cradle-to-grave lifecycle analysis of U.S. light-duty vehicle-fuel pathways: a greenhouse gas emissions and economic assessment of current (2015) and future (2025–2030) technologies. ANL/ESD-16/7. Available at https://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-c2g-2016-report. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  9. Stamp A, Lang DJ, Wäger PA (2012) Environmental impacts of a transition toward e-mobility: the present and future role of lithium carbonate production. J Clean Prod 23:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Faria R, Marques P, Moura P, Freire F, Delgado J, de Almeida AT (2013) Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly JC, MacDonald JS, Keoleian GA (2012) Time-dependent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging based on national driving patterns and demographics. Appl Energy 94:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Onat NC, Kucukvar M, Tatari O (2015) Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States. Appl Energy 150:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmuch R, Wagner R, Hörpel G, Placke T, Winter M (2018) Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nat Energy 3:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pillot C (2018) The rechargeable battery market and main trends 2017–2025. Presentation at 2018 international battery seminar & exhibit. March 26–29, 2018, Fort Lauderdale, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blomgren GE (2017) The development and future of lithium ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 164:A5019–A5025. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0251701jes

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Argonne National Laboratory (2018) BatPaC: a lithium-ion battery performance and cost model for electric-drive vehicles. Available at http://www.cse.anl.gov/batpac/. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  17. Kwade A, Haselrieder W, Leithoff R, Modlinger A, Dietrich F, Droeder K (2018) Current status and challenges for automotive battery production technologies. Nat Energy 3:290–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0130-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed S, Nelson PA, Gallagher KG, Dees DW (2016) Energy impact of cathode drying and solvent recovery during lithium-ion battery manufacturing. J Power Sources 322:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmed S, Nelson PA, Dees DW (2016) Study of a dry room in a battery manufacturing plant using a process model. J Power Sources 326:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellingsen LA-W, Majeau-Bettez G, Singh B, Srivastava AK, Valøen LO, Strømman AH (2014) Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack. J Ind Ecol 18:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim HC, Wallington TJ, Arsenault R, Bae C, Ahn S, Lee J (2016) Cradle-to-gate emissions from a commercial electric vehicle Li-ion battery: a comparative analysis. Environ Sci Technol 50:7715–7722. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai Q, Dunn J, Kelly JC, Elgowainy A (2017) Update of life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries in the GREET model. Available at https://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-Li_battery_update_2017. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  23. Majeau-Bettez G, Hawkins TR, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 45:4548–4554. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103607c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Argonne National Laboratory (2018) GREET model: the greenhous gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation model. Available at https://greet.es.anl.gov/. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  25. Dunn J, Gaines L, Barnes M, Sullivan J, Wang M (2014) Material and energy flows in the materials production, assembly, and end-of-life stages of the automotive lithium-ion battery life cycle. ANL/ESD/12-3 Rev. Available at https://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-li-ion. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  26. Olivetti EA, Ceder G, Gaustad GG, Fu X (2017) Lithium-ion battery supply chain considerations: analysis of potential bottlenecks in critical metals. Joule 1:229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wood DL III, Li J, Daniel C (2015) Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 275:234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. China Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Environmental Protection, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Commerce, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, and the National Energy Administration (2018) Provisional regulation on the recycling and reuse of traction batteries from new energy vehicles. Available at: http://www.miit.gov.cn.http.80.36212d7777.proxy.miit.w06.cn/n1146295/n1652858/n1652930/n3757016/c6068823/content.html. Accessed 25 Sep 2019

  29. Jiao N, Evans S (2016) Market diffusion of second-life electric vehicle batteries: barriers and enablers. World Electric Vehicle Journal 8:599–608. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj8030599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gaines L (2018) Lithium-ion battery recycling processes: research towards a sustainable course. Sustain Mater Technol 17:e00068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Peters JF, Baumann M, Zimmermann B, Braun J, Weil M (2017) The environmental impact of Li-ion batteries and the role of key parameters – a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:491–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ellingsen LA-W, Hung CR, Strømman AH (2017) Identifying key assumptions and differences in life cycle assessment studies of lithium-ion traction batteries with focus on greenhouse gas emissions. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 55:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peters JF, Weil M (2018) Providing a common base for life cycle assessments of li-ion batteries. J Clean Prod 171:704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ambrose H, Kendall A (2016) Effects of battery chemistry and performance on the life cycle greenhouse gas intensity of electric mobility. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 47:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li B, Gao X, Li J, Yuan C (2014) Life cycle environmental impact of high-capacity lithium ion battery with silicon nanowires anode for electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 48:3047–3055. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4037786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Troy S, Schreiber A, Reppert T, Gehrke H-G, Finsterbusch M, Uhlenbruck S, Stenzel P (2016) Life cycle assessment and resource analysis of all-solid-state batteries. Appl Energy 169:757–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gallagher KG, Goebel S, Greszler T, Mathias M, Oelerich W, Eroglu D, Srinivasan V (2014) Quantifying the promise of lithium–air batteries for electric vehicles. Energy Environ Sci 7:1555–1563. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43870H

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Deng Y, Li J, Li T, Gao X, Yuan C (2017) Life cycle assessment of lithium sulfur battery for electric vehicles. J Power Sources 343:284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pang Q, Liang X, Kwok CY, Nazar LF (2016) Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes. Nat Energy 1:16132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Vehicle Technologies Office of the US Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the US Government or any agency thereof. Neither the US Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Dai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dai, Q., Kelly, J.C. (2019). Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications: Life Cycle Analysis. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1081-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1081-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2493-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2493-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics