Skip to main content

Primary Raynaud’s Phenomenon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Raynaud’s Phenomenon

Abstract

Primary (idiopathic) Raynaud’s phenomenon (PRP) is common, especially in women. Although a “benign” condition in that it does not progress to irreversible tissue damage, PRP can be associated with significant pain and disability in those severely affected.

In PRP abnormalities in the digital vasculature are thought to be purely functional: structural vascular disease (as seen in systemic sclerosis) does not occur. Patients with PRP should have no features of an underlying disease and no abnormalities on examination: they should be antinuclear antibody negative, and the full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and nailfold capillaroscopy should all be normal.

Most patients with PRP can be reassured and do not require drug treatment: in many patients symptoms improve spontaneously over the years. If drug treatment is required, a calcium channel blocker (sustained release) is generally the first choice, starting at low dosage and gradually increased as tolerated. If the maximum tolerated dose is ineffective, an alternative vasodilator should be tried, although the evidence base for other therapies is very weak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

PRP:

Primary Raynaud’s phenomenon

RP:

Raynaud’s phenomenon

SSc:

Systemic sclerosis

References

  1. LeRoy EC, Medsger TA. Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1573–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, Czirják L, Tyndall A, Müller-Ladner U, Denton C, et al. The challenge of early systemic sclerosis for the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research Group (EUSTAR) community. It is time to cut the Gordian knot and develop a prevention or rescue strategy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1377–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Avouac J, Fransen J, Walker UA, Riccieri V, Smith V, Muller C, et al. Preliminary criteria for the very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis: results of a Delphi Consensus Study from EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:476–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen EV, Brown GE. Raynaud’s disease: a critical review of minimal requisites for diagnosis. Am J Med Sci. 1932;183:187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LeRoy EC, Medsger TA. Raynaud’s phenomenon: a proposal for classification. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992;10:485–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silman A, Holligan S, Brennan P, Maddison P. Prevalence of symptoms of Raynaud’s phenomenon in general practice. Br Med J. 1990;301:590–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suter LG, Murabito JM, Felson DT, Fraenkel L. The incidence and natural history of Raynaud’s phenomenon in the community. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1259–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrick AL, Jayson MIV. Primary Raynaud’s phenomenon in early childhood. Br J Rheumatol. 1991;30:223–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones GT, Herrick AL, Woodham SE, Baildam EM, Macfarlane GJ, Silman AJ. Occurrence of Raynaud’s phenomenon in children ages 12-15 years. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:3518–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bukhari M, Herrick AL, Moore T, Manning J, Jayson MIV. Increased nailfold capillary dimensions in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. Br J Rheumatol. 1996;35:1127–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bedarida GV, Kim D, Blaschke TF, Hoffman BB. Venodilation in Raynaud’s disease. Lancet. 1993;342:1451–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith PJW, Ferro CJ, McQueen DS, Webb DJ. Impaired cholinergic dilator response of resistance arteries isolated from patients with Raynaud’s disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;47:507–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan F, Litchfiled SJ, McLaren M, Veale DJ, Littleford RC, Belch JJF. Oral L-arginine supplementation and cutaneous vascular responses in patients with primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:352–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bunker CB, Terenghi G, Springall DR, Polak JM, Dowd PM. Deficiency of calcitonin gene-related peptide in Raynaud’s phenomenon. Lancet. 1990;336:1530–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Furspan PB, Chatterjee S, Freedman RR. Increased tyrosine phosphorylation mediates the cooling-induced contraction and increased vascular reactivity of Raynaud’s disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1578–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrick AL, Illingworth K, Blann A, Hay CRM, Hollis S, Jayson MIV. Von Willebrand factor, thrombomodulin, thromboxane, β-thromboglobulin and markers of fibrinolysis in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55:122–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallenberg CGM, Vellenga E, Wouda AA, The TH. Platelet activation, fibrinolytic activity and circulating immune complexes in Raynaud’s phenomenon. J Rheumatol. 1982;9:878–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lau CS, McLaren M, Saniabadi A, Belch JJF. Increased whole blood platelet aggregation in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon with and without systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1993;22:97–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Polidoro L, Barnabei R, Giorgini P, Petrazzi L, Ferri C, Properzi G. Platelet activation in patients with the Raynaud syndrome. Intern Med J. 2012;42:531–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau CS, Bridges AB, Muir A, Scott N, Bancroft A, Belch JJF. Further evidence of increased polymorphonuclear cell activity in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon. Br J Rheumatol. 1992;31:375–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Herrick AL, Rieley F, Schofield D, Hollis S, Braganza JM, Jayson MIV. Micronutrient antioxidant status in patients with primary Raynaud’s phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:1477–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zamora MR, O’Brien RF, Rutherford RB, Weil JV. Serum endothelin-1 concentrations and cold provocation in parimary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Lancet. 1990;336:1144–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leppert J, Ringqvist A, Karlberb BE, Ringqvist I. Whole-body cooling increases plasma endothelin-1 levels in women with primary Rayanud’s phenomenon. Clin Physiol. 1998;18:420–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sulli A, Soldano S, Pizzorni C, Montagna P, Secchi ME, Villaggio B, et al. Raynaud’s phenomenon and plasma endothelin: correlations with capillaroscopic patterns in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1235–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Freedman RR, Mayes MD. Familial aggregation of primary Raynaud’s disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1189–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Susol E, MacGregor AJ, Barrett JH, Wilson H, Black C, Welsh K, et al. A two-stage, genome wide screen for susceptibility loci in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1641–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barrett ME, Heller MM, Stone HR, Murase JE. Raynaud phenomenon of the nipple in breastfeeding mothers: an underdiagnosed cause of nipple pain. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:300–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chikura B, Moore T, Manning J, Vail A, Herrick AL. Thumb involvement in Raynaud’s phenomenon as an indicator of underlying connective tissue disease. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:783–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergman R, Sharony L, Shapira D, Nahir MA, Balbir-Gurman A. The handheld dermatoscope as a nail-fold capillaroscopic instrument. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1027–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moore TL, Roberts C, Murray AK, Helbling I, Herrick AL. Reliability of dermoscopy in the assessment of patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon. Rheumatology. 2010;49:542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Anders HJ, Sigl T, Schattenkirchner M. Differentiation between primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon: a prospective study comparing nailfold capillaroscopy using an opthalmoscope or stereomicroscope. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60:407–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Baron M, Bell M, Bookman A, Buchignani M, Dunne J, Hudson M, et al. Office capillaroscopy in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:1268–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hudson M, Taillefer S, Steele R, Dunne J, Johnson SR, Jones N, et al. Improving the sensitivity of the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:754–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Darton K, Black CM. Pyroelectric vidicon thermography and cold challenge quantify the severity of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Br J Rheumatol. 1991;30:190–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Reilly D, Taylor L, El-Hadidy K, Jayson MIV. Measurement of cold challenge responses in primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud’s phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51:1193–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pauling JD, Flower V, Shipley JA, Harris ND, McHugh NJ. Influence of the cold challenge on the discriminatory capacity of the digital distal-dorsal difference in the thermographic assessment of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Microvasc Res. 2011;82:364–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Suter LG, Murabito JM, Felson DT, Fraenkel L. Smoking, alcohol consumption, and Raynaud’s phenomenon in middle age. Am J Med. 2007;12:264–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fraenkel L, Zhang Y, Chaisson CE, Maricq HR, Evans SR, Brand F, et al. Different factors influencing the expression of Raynaud’s phenomenon in men and women. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:306–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Carpentier PH, Satger B, Poensin D, Maricq HR. Incidence and natural history of Raynaud phenomenon: a long-term follow-up (14 years) of a random sample from the general population. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1023–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thompson AE, Pope JE. Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon: a meta-analysis. Rheumatology. 2005;44:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ennis H, Anderson M, Wilkinson J, Herrick AL. Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014(1):CD002069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002069.pub4.

  42. Pope J. Raynaud’s phenomenon (primary). Clin Evid. 2013;1119.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stewart M, Morling JR. Oral vasodilators for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(7):CD006687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006687.pub3.

  44. Roustit M, Hellman M, Cracowski C, Blaise S, Cracowski JL. Sildenafil increases digital skin blood flow during all phases of local cooling in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:813–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chung L, Shapiro L, Fiorentino D, Baron M, Shanahan J, Sule S, et al. MQX-503, a novel formulation of nitroglycerin, improves the severity of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:870–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Teh LS, Manning J, Moore T, Tully MP, O’Reilly D, Jayson MIV. Sustained-release transdermal glyceryl trinitrate patches as a treatment for primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Br J Rheumatol. 1995;34:636–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gargh K, Baildam EM, Cleary GA, Beresford MW, McCann LJ. A retrospective clinical analysis of pharmacological modalities used for symptomatic relief of Raynaud’s phenomenon in children treated in a UK paediatric rheumatology service. Rheumatology. 2010;49:193–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Coleiro B, Marshall SE, Denton CP, Howell K, Blann A, Welsh KI, et al. Treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. Rheumatology. 2001;40:1038–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Herrick A. Raynaud’s phenomenon (secondary). Clinical evidence. BMJ. 2008;9:1125.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dziadzio M, Denton CP, Smith R, Howell K, Blann A, Bowers E, et al. Losartan therapy for Raynaud’s phenomenon and scleroderma: clinical and biochemical findings in a fifteen-week, randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:2646–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Neumeister MW. Botulinum toxin A in the treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35A:2085–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Spencer-Green G. Outcomes in primary Raynaud phenomenon: a meta-analysis of the frequency, rates and predictors of transition to secondary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:595–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hirschl M, Hirschl K, Lenz M, Katzenschlager R, Hutter H, Kundi M. Transition from primary Raynaud’s phenomenon to secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon identified by diagnosis of an associated disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1974–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Koenig M, Joyal F, Fritzler MJ, Roussin A, Abrahamowicz M, Boire G, et al. Autoantibodies and microvascular damage are independent predictive factors for the progression of Raynaud’s phenomenon to systemic sclerosis: a twenty-year prospective study of 586 patients, with validation of proposed criteria for early systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3902–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cutolo M, Pizzorni C, Sulli A. Identification of transition from primary Raynaud's phenomenon to secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon by nailfold videocapillaroscopy: comment on the article by Hirschl et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:2102–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of Rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1747–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2737–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariane L. Herrick M.D., F.R.C.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herrick, A.L. (2015). Primary Raynaud’s Phenomenon. In: Wigley, F., Herrick, A., Flavahan, N. (eds) Raynaud’s Phenomenon. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1526-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1526-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1525-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1526-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics