Skip to main content

Social Investment: Franco–German Experiences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modernizing Democracy

Abstract

With the global financial and economic crisis as a backdrop, we argue that social investment presents an innovative option with considerable potential. Social investment approaches break conventional boundaries that limit investment either to the world of business or, as public investments, to governments. Rather, social investments turn out to be a third option for policy makers, as they combine the economic and the social, the private and the public. Introducing the key models and tools of social investment, the chapter offers examples of social investments in France and Germany. It finds major deficiencies in how such investments are seen and encouraged, and laments the lack of an enabling framework. In conclusion, the chapter makes a plea for international social investment markets, especially at the European level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed discussion of various conceptualizations and approaches to social investment see Anheier et al. (2012).

  2. 2.

    Emerson (2003) makes a similar point for grant-making foundations: Their purpose is to invest in the creation of social value, i.e., a value other than monetary gains and redistribution.

  3. 3.

    Cooch and Kramer (2007) offer a similar typology and differentiate between conventional investments, based on financial objectives exclusively, and grants, based on charitable objectives. Program-related investments are located in between these two extremes. The latter are grouped into two subtypes: market-rate mission investments and below-market rate mission investments.

  4. 4.

    Kramer and Cooch (2006, p. 16) suggest four PSI categories:

    • Private equity and venture capital that can support start-up organizations (either for profit or nonprofit) through debt or equity investments.

    • Loans and mezzanine capital that offer loans to nonprofit organizations, loans with or without equity participation to privately held for profit companies, and (typically) microfinance loans to individuals; mezzanine forms of capital combine external capital without voting rights with own assets.

    • Loan guarantees that secure loans or bond issues and lower the cost of capital to be borrowed by either for-profit or nonprofit corporations; they can also increase access to capital markets.

    • Bonds and deposits, including mortgage-backed securities, community development bond offerings, and (in the USA) certificates of deposit at community development financial institutions.

  5. 5.

    France Active and the Association pour le Droit à l’Initiative (ADIE) are nonprofits that help direct unemployed individuals in France with microfinance loans and advice into self-employment (see http://www.franceactive.org and http://www.adie.org).The Solidarité Internationale pour le Développement et l’Investissement (International Solidarity for Development and Investment, or SIDI) specializes in financial and technical support for microfinance institutions in developing countries (see http://www.sidi.fr).

  6. 6.

    For example, in public policy, educational expenditures are typically classified as current costs or expense in annual budget but not as investments; similarly, allocation for the restoration of the environmentally degraded areas are seen as expenditures rather than investments.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helmut K. Anheier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anheier, H., Archambault, E. (2014). Social Investment: Franco–German Experiences. In: Freise, M., Hallmann, T. (eds) Modernizing Democracy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0485-3_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics