Skip to main content

An Efficiency Measurement Framework for Multi-stage Production Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Envelopment Analysis

Abstract

We develop an efficiency measurement framework for systems composed of two subsystems arranged in series that simultaneously computes the efficiency of the aggregate system and each subsystem. Our approach expands the technology sets of each subsystem by allowing each to acquire resources from the other in exchange for delivery of the appropriate (intermediate or final) product, and to form composites from both subsystems. Managers of each subsystem will not agree to “vertical integration” initiatives unless each subsystem will be more efficient than what each can achieve by separately applying conventional efficiency analysis. A Pareto Efficient frontier characterizes the acceptable set of efficiencies of each subsystem from which the managers will negotiate to select the final outcome. Three proposals for the choice for the Pareto efficient point are discussed: the one that achieves the largest equiproportionate reduction in the classical efficiencies; the one that achieves the largest equal reduction in efficiency; and the one that maximizes the radial contraction in the aggregate consumption of resources originally employed before integration. We show how each choice for the Pareto efficient point determines a derived measure of aggregate efficiency. An extensive numerical example is used to illustrate exactly how the two subsystems can significantly improve their operational efficiencies via integration beyond what would be predicted by conventional analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Halek, R., Klopp, G., Schmitz, E., & Thomas, D. (1986a). Two phase data envelopment analysis approaches to policy evaluation and management of army recruiting activities: Tradeoffs between joint services and army advertising. (Research Report CCS no. 532). Center for Cybernetic Studies, The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Thrall, R. (1986b). Identifying and classifying scale and technical efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters, 5, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. R., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology & Management Journal, 5, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W., Chai, D., Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1998). Hierarchies and groups in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 10, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Intertemporal production frontiers: With dynamic DEA. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Primont, D. (1984). Efficiency measures for multiplant firms. Operations Research Letters, 3, 257–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Whittaker, G. (1995). An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46, 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Li, S. K. (1992). Linear programming models for firm and industry performance. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1994). Production frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. C., Rinnoy Kan, A. H. G., & Zipkin, P. H. (1993). Logistics of production and inventory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, S. T., & Leachman, R. C. (1989). A general framework for modeling production. Management Science, 35, 478–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, S. T., & Passy, U. (2002). Maximizing a linear fractional function on a pareto efficient frontier. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 113, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, S. T., Frazelle, E. H., Griffin, P. M., Griffin, S. O., & Vlatsa, D. A. (2001). Benchmarking warehousing and distribution operations: An input-output approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, B., Triantis, K. P., & Partangel, N. (2000). The relationship between process and manufaturing plant performance: A goal programming approach. International Journal on Operations and Quantitative Management, 6, 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehle, G. A., & Reny, P. J. (2001). Advanced microeconomic theory, (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. A., & Montgomery, D. C. (1974). Operations research in production planning, scheduling and inventory control. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löthgren, M., & Tambour, M. (1999). Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. (1985). Measures for technical efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 35, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., & Magazine, M. (1999). Quantitative models for supply chain management. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Troutt, M.D., Ambrose, P., & Chan, C.K. (2001). Optimal throughput for multistage input – output processes. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21, 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2002). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boaz Golany .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golany, B., Hackman, S.T., Passy, U. (2014). An Efficiency Measurement Framework for Multi-stage Production Systems. In: Cook, W., Zhu, J. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 208. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8068-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics