Skip to main content

Hunter-Gatherers and Neo-Darwinian Cultural Transmission

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hunter-Gatherers

Abstract

Cultural transmission theory—sometimes called dual inheritance theory—is the focus of this chapter. The neo-Darwinian models presented here treat cultural transmission and reproduction as extrasomatic rather than simple biological analogs. This leads to predictions about behavior that differ fundamentally from those that follow from the genetic model upon which classic evolutionary ecological analyses rest, but that in many ways better account for behaviors that distinguish humans from other organisms (e.g., altruism, cooperation).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Biased cultural transmission (direct or indirect) is “biased” in two senses. First, the individual receiving cultural information is biased in favor of some information (e.g., traits) and against others. Second, biased transmission results in a cultural population that, following cultural transmission, is a biased sample of the cultural population before transmission.

  2. 2.

    Too little is presently known about other contemporaneous species/sub-species H. floresiensis (Brown et al. 2004) and the Denisovans (Reich et al. 2010) to determine their role in the Upper Paleolithic transition.

  3. 3.

    Following Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman (1981), Hewlett and Cavalli-Sforza (1986) infer that the effect of this “horizontal” transmission process is conservative (horizontal here refers to cultural transmission via lines that are other than parental or vertical). That is because in Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman’s model of cultural transmission, horizontal transmission results in cultural blending (see previous discussion, this chapter) that minimizes the impact of innovations. When it is assumed that biases (direct or indirect) are involved in horizontal transmission, the result is the opposite: Access to a greater number of potential models increases the chance that a favorable innovation will be observed and adopted.

References

  • Bettinger, R. L. (2002). Why corn never came to California. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Anthropology, UC Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L. (2009). Macroevolutionary theory and archaeology: Is there a big picture? In A.M. Prentiss, I. Kuijt, & J. Chatters (Eds.), Macroevolution in human prehistory: Evolutionary theory and processual archaeology (pp. 275–295). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L., & Eerkens, J. W. (1999). Point typologies, cultural transmission, and the spread of bow-and-arrow technology in the prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity, 64, 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L., & Winterhalder, B. (2010). Nutritional and social benefits of foraging in California. California Archaeology, 2, 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (1996). Style, function, and cultural evolutionary processes. In H. Maschner (Ed.), Darwinian archaeologies (pp. 133–164). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1972). Contemporary model building: Paradigms and the current state of Paleolithic research. In D. L. Clark (Ed.), Models in archaeology (pp. 109–166). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1973). Interassemblage variability–the Mousterian and the “functional” argument. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change (pp. 227–254). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1978a). Nunamiut ethnoarchaelogy. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1982). The archaeology of place. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: Reliability or maintainability. American Antiquity, 51, 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1973). On the chronology and contemporaneity of different Palaeolithic cultures in France. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change (pp. 217–226). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1983). The cultural transmission of acquired variation: Effects on genetic fitness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 100, 567–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1987). The evolution of ethnic markers. Cultural Anthropology, 2, 65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd. R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132, 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizeable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., & McElreath, R. (2005). Shared Norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. In R. Boyd & P. J. Richerson (Eds.), The origin and evolution of cultures (pp. 118–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., Gintis, H., & Bowles, S. (2010). Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science, 328, 617–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. (1978). Style and information in cultural evolution: Toward a predictive model for the Paleolithic. In C. L. Redman, J. M. Berman, E. V. Curtin, W. T. Langhorne, N. M. Versaggi, & J. C. Wanser (Eds.), Social archaeology: Beyond subsistence and dating (pp. 61–85). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. (1980). The identification of prehistoric hunter-gatherer aggregation sites: The case of Altimira. Current Anthropology, 21, 609–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Anastasio, R., Wrow, S., Tuniz, C., Mancini, L., Cesana, D. T., Dreossi, D., Ravichandiran, M., Attard, M., Parr, W. C. H., Agur, A., & Capasso, L. (2013). Micro-biomechanics of the Kebara 2 hyoid and its implications for speech in Neanderthals. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e82261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection according to sex. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J. (1965). The dynamics of stylistic change in Arikara ceramics. Illinois Studies in Anthropology 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Errico, F. (2003). The invisible frontier: A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel . New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity, 43, 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. (1980). Evolutionary theory and archaeology. In M.B. Schiffer (Ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory, Vol. 3 (pp. 35–99). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J. W., & Bettinger, R. L. (2008). Cultural transmission and the analysis of stylistic and functional variation. In M. J. O’Brien (Ed.), Cultural transmission and archaeology: Issues and case studies (pp. 21–38). Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J. W., & Lipo, C. P. (2007). Cultural transmission theory and the archaeological record: Providing context to understanding variation and temporal changes in material culture. Journal of Archaeological Research, 15, 239–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J. W., Bettinger, R. L., & Richerson, P. J. (2014). Cultural transmission theory and hunter-gatherer archaeology. In V. Cummings, P. Jordan, & M. Zvelebil (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the archaeology and anthropology of hunter-gatherers (pp. 1127–1142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Féblot-Augustins, J. (2009). Revisiting European Upper Paleolithic raw material transfers: The demise of the cultural ecological paradigm. In B. Adams & B. Blades (Eds.), Lithic materials and Paleolithic societies (pp. 25–46). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1958). The genetical theory of natural selection (Revised ed.). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. V. (1969). Origins and effects of early domestication in Iran and Near East. In P. J. Ucko & G. W. Dimbleby (Eds.), The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals (pp. 73–100). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. A. (1954). On the concept of types. American Anthropologist, 56, 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1971). A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1974b). Why a perfect knowledge of all the rules one must know to act like a native cannot lead to the knowledge of how natives act. Journal of Anthropological Research, 30, 242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., Hill, K., & Charnov, E. L. (1985). How much is enough? Hunters and limited needs. Ethnology and Sociobiology, 6, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2004a). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2004b). Demography and cultural evolution: Why adaptive cultural processes produced maladaptive losses in Tasmania. American Antiquity, 69, 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2003). The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2007). Dual-inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In R. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 555–570). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, B. S., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1986). Cultural transmission among Aka pygmies. American Anthropologist, 88, 922–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1979). Economic and social stress and material culture patterning. American Antiquity, 44, 446–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffecker, j.f. (2005). Innovation and technological knowledge in the Upper Paleolithic of northErn eurasia. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hublin, j.j. (2009). The origin of Neanderthals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 16022–16027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., & Hill, K. (1985). Food sharing among Aché foragers: Tests of explanatory hypotheses. Current Anthropology, 16, 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, P. V. (1980). The archaeological study of adaptation: Theoretical and methodological issues. In M. Schiffer (Ed.) Advances in Archaeological Theory and Method, Vol. 3, (pp. 101–156). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G. (2000). Archaeology and the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. A., & Boyd, R. (2010). Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 2559–2564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenetic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 78, 3721–3725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (2007). The evolution of human speech: Its anatomical and neural bases. Current Anthropology, 48, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 453–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, I., Brown, F. H., & Fleagle, J. G. (2005). Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia. Nature, 433, 733–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44, 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElreath, R., Lubell, M., Richerson, P. J., Waring, T. M., Baum, W., Edsten, E., Efferson, C., & Paciotti, B. (2005). Applying formal models to the laboratory study of social learning: The impact of task difficulty and environmental fluctuation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 483–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2008a). The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile-point technology I: An experimental simulation. American Antiquity, 73, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2008b). The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile-point technology II: An agent-based computer simulation. American Antiquity, 73, 627–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. F. (1970). Basin ethnography and ecological theory. In languages and cultures of western North America: Essays in honor of Sven Liljeblad (pp. 152–171). Pocatello: Idaho State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997). Social markers and the evolution of reciprocal exchange. Current Anthropology, 38, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donald, P. (1980). Genetic models of sexual selection. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orans, M. (1975). Domesticating the functional dragon: An analysis of Piddocke’s potlatch. American Anthropologist, 77, 312–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, R. (1998). Environmental hypotheses of hominin evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 27, 93–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premo, L. S. (2014). Cultural transmission and diversity in time-averaged assemblages. Current Anthropology, 55, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, D., Green, R. E., Kircher, M., Krause, J., Patterson, N., Durand, E. Y., Viola, B., Briggs, A. W., Stenzel, U., Johnson, P. L. F., Maricic, T., Good, J. M., Marques-Bonet, T., Alkan, C., Fu, Q., Mallick, S., Li, H., Meyer, M., Eichler, E. E., Stoneking, M., Richards, M., Talamo, S., Shunkov, M. V., Derevianko, A. P., Hublin, J-J., Kelso, J., Slatkin, M., & Pääbo, S. (2010). Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia. Nature, 468, 1053–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendu, W., Beauval, C., Crevecoeur, I., Bayle, P., Balzeau, A., Bismuth, T., Bourguignon, L., Delfour, G., Faivre, J-P., Lacramp-Cuyaubère, F., Todisco, D., Turq, A., & Maurelle, B. (2013). Evidence supporting an intentional Neandertal burial at La Chapelle-Aux-Saints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R., & Bettinger, R. L. (2009). Cultural innovations and demographic change. Human Biology, 81, 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. R. (1988). Does biology constrain culture? American Anthropologist, 90(4),819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, I. (1960). The classification of artifacts in archaeology. American Antiquity, 25, 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1979). Equilibrium in supergames with the overtaking criterion. Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1990). Style and ethnicity in archaeology: The case for isocrestism. In M. Conkey & C. Hastorf (Eds.), Uses of style in archaeology (pp. 32–43). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. (1991). Style in arrows: A Study of an ethnographic collection from the western United States. In P. T. Miracle, L.E. Fisher, & J. Brown (Eds.), Foragers in context: Long-term regional and historical perspectives in hunter-gatherer studies. Michigan Discussions in Anthropology 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Can group-functional behaviors evolve by cultural group selection? An empirical test. Current Anthropology, 36, 473–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, A. C. (1953). Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity, 18, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiner, M. C. (2002). Carnivory, coevolution, and the geographic spread of the genus Homo. Journal of Archaeological Research, 10, 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiner, M. C., Munro, N. D., & Surovell, T. A. (2000). The tortoise and the hare: Small game use, the Broad Spectrum Revolution, and Paleolithic demography. Current Anthropology, 41, 39–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. H. (1978). Arrowheads and atlatl darts: How the stone got the shaft. American Antiquity, 43, 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrence, R. (1989). Tools as optimal solutions. In R. Torrence (Ed.), Time, energy and stone tools (pp. 1–6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkhaus, E. (2005). Early modern humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whallon, R., Jr. (1971). A computer program for monothetic subdivisive classification in archaeology. Michigan University of Museum of Anthropology Technical Reports 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1982). Rethinking the Middle/Upper Paleolithic transition. Current Anthropology, 23, 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1997). Seeking guidelines though an evolutionary approach: Style revisited among the !Kung San (Ju/huansi) of the 1990s. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 7, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Bettinger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bettinger, R., Garvey, R., Tushingham, S. (2015). Hunter-Gatherers and Neo-Darwinian Cultural Transmission. In: Hunter-Gatherers. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7581-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics