Skip to main content

Forensic Applications, Overview

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 162 Accesses

Synonyms

Forensic Applications

Introduction

The use of biometric data is a decisive process in forensic science that helps to establish a person’s identity or associate two unknown persons. Forensic scientists realized that physiological or behavioral data could help to inform about, sort, and potentially individualize the persons involved in criminal offenses. It is the case when (1) an unknown individual (living or his/her remains) has to be identified, (2) when biometric traces left by unknown individuals during activities of interest have to be traced back to their sources, or (3) when biometric traces have to be linked together in a series. Situations (1) and (2) require comparison between biometric information gathered from unknown sources and material of known (or declared as such) origin, either on a one-to-one or on a one-to-many basis. In the latter case, data of known origin are organized in a database, allowing one-to-many searches. The third situation (3) compares...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. K. Yamazaki, K. Imaizumi, S. Kubota, M. Atsuchi, K. Noguchi, M. Yosino, Experimental study on personal identification from faceprint on vehicle’s airbag. Jpn. J. Sci. Technol. Identif. 9(1), 19–27 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Dessimoz, C. Champod, Linkages between biometrics and forensic science, in Handbook of Biometrics, ed. by P.J. Flynn, A.K Jain, A. Ross (Springer, New York, 2007), pp. 425–459

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Saks, D.L. Faigman, Expert evidence after Daubert. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1(1), 105–130 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Cole, Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Berry, D.A. Stoney, The history and development of fingerprinting, in Advances in Fingerprint Technology, ed. by H.C. Lee, R.E. Gaensslen, 2nd edn. (CRC, Boca Raton, 2001), pp. 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Champod, C.J. Lennard, P.A. Margot, M. Stoilovic, Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions (CRC, Boca Raton, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Komarinski, Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS) (Elsevier, New York, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.M. Butler, Forensic DNA Typing, 2nd edn. (Elsevier, Burlington, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.E. Gaensslen, Sourcebook in Forensic Serology, Immunology, and Biochemistry (US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, US Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Sweet, I.A. Pretty, A look at forensic dentistry – Part 1: the role of teeth in the determination of human identity. Br. Dent. J. 190(7), 359–366 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.M. Black (ed.), Forensic Human Identification: An Introduction (CRC, Boca Raton, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.B. Pickering, D.C. Bachman, The Use of Forensic Anthropology (CRC, Boca Raton, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (ed.), Forensic Analysis of the Skull: Craniofacial Analysis, Reconstruction, and Identification (Wiley, New York, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.M. Christensen, Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 127(3), 291–295 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.R. Falguera, F.P.S. Falguera, A.N. Marana, Frontal sinus recognition for human identification, in Biometric Technology for Human Identification V, ed. by B.V.K. Vijaya Kumar, S. Prabhakar, A.A. Ross. Proceedings of the SPIE, Orlando, 18 Mar 2008, p. 69440S-9 (SPIE, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Frudakis, Molecular Photofitting: Predicting Ancestry and Phenotype Using DNA (Academic, Burlington, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.J. Hoogstrate, C. van den Heuvel, E. Huyben, Ear identification based on surveillance camera images. Sci. Justice 41(3), 167–172 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. van der Lugt, Earprint Identification (Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie, Gravenhage, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.B. Kennedy, A.B. Yamashita, Barefoot morphology comparison: a summary. J. Forensic Ident. 57(3), 383–413 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Caussé, Des empreintes sanglantes des pieds, et de leur mode de mensuration. Ann. hyg. publique méd. lég. 1(2ème série), 175-189 (1854)

    Google Scholar 

  21. B.J. Dorion (ed.), Bitemark Evidence (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. I.A. Pretty, The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 159(Suppl. 1), S110–S120 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. C.M. Bowers, Problem-based analysis of bitemark misidentifications: the role of DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. 159(Suppl. 1), S104–S109 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. R.A. Huber, A.M. Headrick, Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals (CRC, Boca Raton, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Marquis, M. Schmittbuhl, S. Bozza, F. Taroni, Quantitative characterization of morphological polymorphism of handwritten characters loops. Forensic Sci. Int. 164, 211–220 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Schomaker, Advances in writer identification and verification, in Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition – ICDAR 2007, 2007, pp. 1268–1273

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Srihari, C. Huang, H. Srinivasan, On the discriminability of the handwriting of twins. J. Forensic Sci. 53(2), 430–446 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. R.H. Bolt, F.S. Cooper, D.M. Green, S.L. Hamlet, J.G. McKnight, J.M. Pickett et al., On the Theory and Practice of Voice Identification (National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  29. M.Y. Iscan, Introduction of techniques for photographic comparison: potential and problems, in Forensic Analysis of the Skull, ed. by M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1993), pp. 57–70

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Choras, Human lips as emerging biometrics modality, in Proceedings of the Image Analysis and Recognition: 5th International Conference, ICIAR 2008, Póvoa de Varzim, June 25–27, 2008 (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 993–1002

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Jain, J-E. Lee, R. Jin, Tattoo-ID: automatic tattoo image retrieval for suspect and victim identification, in Advances in Multimedia Information Processing – PCM 2007, Singapore, 2007, pp. 256–265

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Champod, C. (2015). Forensic Applications, Overview. In: Li, S.Z., Jain, A.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7488-4_100

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics