Abstract
Fractures of the fifth metatarsal are common injuries in athletes and active individuals. Overuse injuries and stress fractures of the metatarsals were first described in the nineteenth century military recruits and soldiers after intense training. Fifth metatarsal fractures in athletes have more recently been described in a wide variety of sports, running, and ballet.
The anatomy of the fifth metatarsal and its soft tissue attachments lead to a variety of injury patterns based on different mechanisms of injury. Footwear selection, shoe-surface interface (cleats, turf), and foot type (cavovarus, adductus) may also play a role in acute and chronic injuries patterns.
Diagnosis of fifth metatarsal fractures can generally be made after a complete history and physical exam along with three-view radiographs of the foot. For chronic overuse injuries and stress fractures not visible on plain radiographs, CT imaging may help confirm the diagnosis.
Treatment recommendations range from conservative treatment, with limited weight bearing and immobilization, to surgery. The treatment of choice depends on the fracture pattern and location, and the goals and expectations of the patient. Competitive athletes have a unique set of demands and expectations, which often drive management decisions, with an emphasis on rapid recovery and return to sport. Operative versus non-operative treatment decisions directly affect rehabilitation, return to sport, union rates, and risk for re-injury.
The purpose of this chapter is to review the literature related to fifth metatarsal fractures in athletes. The basic and surgical anatomy is reviewed along with various fracture classifications systems. Diagnosis and treatment options are discussed by fracture type, along with functional rehabilitation for athletes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Breithaupt MD. Zur pathologie des menschlichen fusses. Med Zeitung. 1855;24:169.
Carp L. Fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone: with special reference to delayed union. Ann Surg. 1927;86(2):308–20.
Kirchner A. Ueberdassogenannten Fussgeschwulst. J.F. Bergmann: Wiesbaden; 1898.
Donald JG, Fitts Jr WT. March fractures; a study with special reference to etiological factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1947;29(2):297–300.
DeLee JC, Evans JP, Julian J. Stress fracture of the fifth metatarsal. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11(5):349–53.
Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(6):776–82.
O’Malley MJ, Hamilton WG, Munyak J. Fractures of the distal shaft of the fifth metatarsal. “Dancer’s fracture”. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(2):240–3.
Jones RI. Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg. 1902;35(6):697–700.2.
Chuckpaiwong B, Queen RM, Easley ME, Nunley JA. Distinguishing Jones and proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(8):1966–70.
Fernandez Fairen M, Guillen J, Busto JM, Roura J. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal in basketball players. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(6):373–7.
Goulart M, O’Malley MJ, Hodgkins CW, Charlton TP. Foot and ankle fractures in dancers. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27(2):295–304.
Larson CM, Almekinders LC, Taft TN, Garrett WE. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures. Analysis of failure. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(1):55–60.
Mologne TS, Lundeen JM, Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ. Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of acute Jones fractures. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(7):970–5.
Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Kakitsubata Y, Botte MJ, Resnick D. Fractures of proximal portion of fifth metatarsal bone: anatomic and imaging evidence of a pathogenesis of avulsion of the plantar aponeurosis and the short peroneal muscle tendon. Radiology. 2003;226(3):857–65.
McKeon KE, Johnson JE, McCormick JJ, Klein SE. The intraosseous and extraosseous vascular supply of the fifth metatarsal: implications for fifth metatarsal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(1):117–23.
Quill Jr GE. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;26(2):353–61.
Shereff MJ, Yang QM, Kummer FJ, Frey CC, Greenidge N. Vascular anatomy of the fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. 1991;11(6):350–3.
Smith JW, Arnoczky SP, Hersh A. The intraosseous blood supply of the fifth metatarsal: implications for proximal fracture healing. Foot Ankle. 1992;13(3):143–52.
Petrisor BA, Ekrol I, Court-Brown C. The epidemiology of metatarsal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(3):172–4.
Stewart IM. Jones’s fracture: fracture of base of fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:190–8.
Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR, Pavlov H, Peff TC, Das M. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity. Classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(2):209–14.
Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones’ fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(6):358–65.
Portland G, Kelikian A, Kodros S. Acute surgical management of Jones’ fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(11):829–33.
Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(5):332–8.
Glasgow MT, Naranja Jr RJ, Glasgow SG, Torg JS. Analysis of failed surgical management of fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: the Jones fracture. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(8):449–57.
Hunt KJ, Anderson RB. Treatment of Jones fracture nonunions and refractures in the elite athlete: outcomes of intramedullary screw fixation with bone grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1948–54.
Wright RW, Fischer DA, Shively RA, Heidt Jr RS, Nuber GW. Refracture of proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fracture after intramedullary screw fixation in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):732–6.
Ritchie JD, Shaver JC, Anderson RB, Lawrence SJ, Mair SD. Excision of symptomatic nonunions of proximal fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures in elite athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2466–9.
Holmes Jr GB. Treatment of delayed unions and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(10):552–6.
Nelson FR, Brighton CT, Ryaby J, et al. Use of physical forces in bone healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(5):344–54.
Bodamyali T, Bhatt B, Hughes FJ, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields simultaneously induce osteogenesis and upregulate transcription of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in rat osteoblasts in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;250(2):458–61.
Callaghan MJ, Chang EI, Seiser N, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate normal and diabetic wound healing by increasing endogenous FGF-2 release. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(1):130–41.
Guerkov HH, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase growth factor release by nonunion cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:265–79.
Li X, Kolega J. Effects of direct current electric fields on cell migration and actin filament distribution in bovine vascular endothelial cells. J Vasc Res. 2002;39(5):391–404.
Philbin TM, Lin HN, O’Connor JP, Lin S. Growth factor expression and healing time after pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of 5th metatarsal nonunions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. In: AOFAS 28th annual meeting. San Diego
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Granata, J.D., Philbin, T.M. (2014). Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal. In: Philbin, T. (eds) Sports Injuries of the Foot. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7427-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7427-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7426-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7427-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)