Skip to main content

The Search for Missing Matter

  • Chapter
The Cyclical Serpent

Abstract

The best hope for determining the destiny of the universe, and to learn whether or not our distant descendants will be pulverized in a Big Crunch, involves a fairly straightforward method. First, measure the current value of the Hubble parameter. Sandage, Tammann, and others are working on this; odds are that it is between 40 and 75. Second, square this figure and multiply by the quantity of 1.9×10-33 grams per cubic centimeter (this is an approximation) to find the critical density. The larger the Hubble parameter and the faster the expansion of the cosmos, the greater the density needed to arrest the expansion. Assuming a low value for H 0, then the critical density is about 5×10–30 grams per cubic centimeter. Third, divide the critical density into the actual material density of the cosmos to get omega. Finally, decide if omega is less than one, equal to one, or greater than one.

For the first time there is evidence of enough dark matter to support the idea that the universe is closed.

—Richard Mushotzky, Goddard Space Flight Center

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Richard F. Mushotzky and John Mulchaey, quoted in Kathy Sawyer, “Astronomers Discover Mysterious Dark Matter,” Philadelphia Inquirer, January 5, 1993, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phone conversation with John Mulchaey of the University of Maryland, April 28,1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartusiak, Marcia, Through A Universe Darkly: A Cosmic Tale of Ancient Ethers, Dark Matter and the Fate of the Universe (New York: HarperCollins, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cowen, R., “Dark Matter: MACHOS in Milky Way’s Halo?” Science News (September 1993): 199.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Croswell, Ken, “Universe Will Expand Forever,” New Scientist (December 18,1993): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S., and White, S. D. M., “The End of Cold Dark Matter?” Nature Vol. 356 (April 1992): 489.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferris, Timothy, Coming of Age in the Milky Way (New York: William Morrow, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geller, Margaret, “The Universe: Always Room for More?” In Creation and the End of Days: Judaism and Scientific Cosmology, edited by David Novak and Norbert Samuelson(New York: University Press of America, 1985), pp. 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hodges, Hardy M., “Mirror Baryons as the Dark Matter,” Physical Review, D15 Vol. 47 (January 1993): 456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krauss, Lawrence, The Search for the Fifth Essence: Dark Matter in the Universe (New York: Basic Books, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parker, Barry, Invisible Matter and the Fate of the Universe (New York: Plenum, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker, Barry, “The Missing Mass Mystery,” Astronomy (November 1984): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Redfern, Martin, “Galactic Cannibalism Has Made Milky Way Big and Fat.” New Scientist (June 5,1993): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riordan, Michael, and Schramm, David, The Shadows of Creation: Dark Matter and the Structure of the Universe (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tayler, Roger, The Hidden Universe (New York: Ellis Horwood, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trefil, James, The Dark Side of the Universe (New York: Scribners, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Trimble, Virginia, “Existence and Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe.” In The Early Universe: Reprints, edited by Edward Kolb and Michael Turner (New York: Addison-Wesley, 1988), pp. 67–105.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tucker, Wallace, and Tucker, Karen, The Dark Matter (New York: Morrow, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tyson, Anthony, “Mapping Dark Matter with Gravitational Lenses,” Physics Today (June 1992): 24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. White, Simon D. M., “Dynamical Estimates of Omega from Galaxy Clustering,” in Observational Tests of Cosmological Inflation, edited by T. Shanks et al. (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991), pp. 279–291.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. White, Simon D. M., Navarro, Julio F., Evrard, August E., and Frenk, Carlos S., “The Baryon Content of Galaxy Clusters: A Challenge to Cosmological Orthodoxy,” Nature, Vol. 366 (December 1993): 429.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Paul Halpern

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halpern, P. (1995). The Search for Missing Matter. In: The Cyclical Serpent. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6036-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6036-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44923-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6036-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics