Skip to main content

Reliable Models

Maintaining Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Your Data Science Projects
  • 1380 Accesses

Abstract

You may have developed a model that meets your customers’ needs and earns their trust. Keeping that trust, however, requires you to ensure that your model continues to perform as close to its peak efficacy as possible throughout its lifecycle. To make sure that happens, models need surveillance and maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cathy O’Neil, Weapons of Math Destruction (New York: Crown Press, 2016).

  2. 2.

    Dave Gershgorn, “Tech companies just woke up to a big problem with their AI,” Quartz, June 30, 2018, qz.com/1316050/tech-companies-just-woke-up-to-a-big-problem-with-their-ai/.

  3. 3.

    Irv Lustig, “Bringing QA to Data Science,” Software Testing News, October 11, 2018, www.softwaretestingnews.co.uk/bringing-qa-to-data-science-2/ .

  4. 4.

    Li Cai and Yangyong Zhu, “The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era,” Data Science Journal, 14, p. 2, May 22, 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002 .

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Fatimah Sidi, et al., “Data Quality: A Survey of Data Quality Dimensions,” 2012, International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management, DOI: 10.1109/InfRKM.2012.6204995.

  7. 7.

    The Six Primary Dimensions For Data Quality Assessment, DAMA UK, October 2013, www.damauk.org/community.php?sid=7997d2df1befd7e241a39169a2c95780&communityid=1000054 .

  8. 8.

    James Guszcza, Iyad Rahwan, Will Bible, Manuel Cebrian, and Vic Katyal, “Why We Need to Audit Algorithms,” Harvard Business Review, November 28, 2018, https://hbr.org/2018/11/why-we-need-to-audit-algorithms .

  9. 9.

    Andrew Clark, “The Machine Learning Audit—CRISP-DM Framework,” ISACA Journal, Vol. 1, 2018, www.isaca.org/Journal/archives/2018/Volume-1/Pages/the-machine-learning-audit-crisp-dm-framework.aspx .

  10. 10.

    Pete Chapman, Julian Clinton, Randy Kerber, Thomas Khabaza, Thomas Reinartz, Colin Shearer, and RĂĽdiger Wirth, CRISP-DM 1.0, www.the-modeling-agency.com/crisp-dm.pdf .

  11. 11.

    Roger W. Berger, Donald W. Benbow, Ahmad K. Elshennay, and Walker HF, The Certified Quality Engineer Handbook (Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press, 2002).

  12. 12.

    Douglas C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (New York: Wiley, 1997).

  13. 13.

    Rajesh Jugulum. Competing With High Quality Data (New York: Wiley, 2016).

  14. 14.

    Miaomiao Yu, Chungjie Wu, and Fujee Tsung, “Monitoring the Data Quality of Data Streams Using a Two Step Control Scheme,” IISE Transactions, October 2018, DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2018.1530487.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Robert de Graaf

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Graaf, R. (2019). Reliable Models. In: Managing Your Data Science Projects. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4907-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics