Skip to main content

How Transmission Delays and Noise Modify the Simple and Large Neural Networks Dynamics

  • Chapter
Computational Neuroscience

Abstract

In the nervous system, information transfer is partly mediated by action potentials travelling along axons connecting neurons. Conduction velocity ranges from 20 to 60 m/s, leading to non negligible transmission delays, from milliseconds to hundreds of milliseconds. These delays, referred to as inter-neural delays (INDs) reflect axonal propagation time, synaptic delay, etc., can greatly affect the behavior of living neural networks. The effect of IND on the dynamics of a single neuron receiving recurrent excitation after a controlled delay, and on those of large fully interconnected excitatory networks were described and analyzed in two previous papers (Pakdaman et al., 1996; Vibert et al.. 1996). Noise, as INDs, is also omnipresent in the nervous system, and can greatly modify the behavior of neurons and neural networks (Segundo et al., 1994). In this paper, we are interested on how noise affects the IND effect on both the single neuron with recurrent excitation and the excitatory neural network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown D.A.: M-current: an update. Trends in Neurosciences, 11: 294–299 (1988)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connor J.A., Stevens C.F.: Inward and delayed outward membrane currents in isolated neural somata under voltage clamp. Journal of Physiology. 213: 1–19 (1971)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diez-Martinez O., Segundo, J.P. Behavior of a single neuron in a recurrent excitatory loop. Biol. Cybern, 47: 33–41 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin G., Champagnat J. Spontaneous synaptic activities in rat nucleus tractus solitarius neurons in vitro. Bran Res. 630: 125–135 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pakdaman K.. Grotta-Ragazzo C., Malta C.P.. Vibert J-F. Effect of delay on the boundary of the basin of attraction in a system of two neurons. Publicaçòes Universidade de Sao Paulo IFUSP/P-I 169: 1 25 (1995a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakdaman K., Grotta-Ragazzo C., Malta C.P., Vibert J-F. Delay-induced transient oscillations in a two-neuron network. Publicaçòes Universidade de Sao Paulo Technical report IFUSP/P-I I81: 1–23 (1995b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakdaman K., Vibert J-F. Modeling excitatory networks. J. SICE. 34: 788–793 (1995c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakdaman K.. Vibert J-F. Boussard E., Azmy N. Single neuron with recurrent excitation: Effect of the transmission delay. Neural Networks, in press (1995d)

    Google Scholar 

  • Segundo J.P.. Vibert J-F, Pakdaman K., Stiber M., Diez Martinez, O. Noise and the neurosciences: a long history with a recent revival (and some theory). In: Pribram K. (Eds). “Origins: Brain and Self Organization”. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub.; 299–331 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm J.F.: Temporal integration by a slowly inactivating K’ current in hippocampal neurons. Nature, 336: 379–381 (1988)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vibert J-F. J.P., Segundo. Slowly-adapting stretch-receptor organs: periodic stimulation with and without perturbations. Biol. Cybernetics, 33: 81–95 (1979)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vibert J-F, Pakdaman K., Azmy N. Inter-neural delay modification synchronizes biologically plausible neural networks. Neural Networks, 7: 589–607, (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibert J-F.. Pham.I.. Pakdaman K, Azmy N. XNBC: A simulation tool for neurobiologists. In: The neurobiology of Computation. J. Bower Ed. Kluwer Academic Pub., Boston (USA); 346–352 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibert J-F, Pakdaman K.. Boussard E., Av-Ron E. XNBC: a simulation tool. Application to the study of neural coding using hybrid networks. BioSystems, 40: 211–218 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pakdaman, K., Pham, J., Boussard, E., Vibert, JF. (1997). How Transmission Delays and Noise Modify the Simple and Large Neural Networks Dynamics. In: Bower, J.M. (eds) Computational Neuroscience. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9800-5_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9800-5_70

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9802-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9800-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics