Abstract
In studying communities dealing with groundwater contamination, we find that perceptions of the health risk are affected by collective perception of the risk management. Both perception of the risk and perception of the risk management, we find, are shaped by factors in the local context. This paper identifies ten context factors that affect community response and may explain why different communities respond differently. It is suggested that long-range benefits for protection of health and environment could be achieved if these local context factors were taken into account in planning and carrying out risk management.
This paper is part of a series of five related papers entitled “Enhancing Risk Management by Focusing on the Local Level.” Research for this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation — Ethics and Values in Sciences and Technology (RII-8409912). All views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Science Foundation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berry, David, et al., 1984, “Costs and Benefits of Removing Volatile Organic Compounds from Drinking Water,” Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
Berry, David and J. Andrew Stoeckle, 1985, “Decentralization of Risk Management: The Case of Drinking Water,” Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
Douglas, Mary and Aaron Wildaysky, 1982, Risk and Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Edelstein, Michael R., 1982, “The Social and Psychological Impacts of Groundwater Contamination in the Legler Section of Jackson, Mew Jersey,” (unpublished ms.).
Fessenden-Raden, June, Carole A. Bisogni, and Keith S. Porter, 1986, “Enhancing Risk Management by Focusing on the Local Level,” this volume.
Fitchen, Janet M., 1985, “Cultural Factors Affecting Perception and Management of Environmental Risks: American Communities Facing Chemical Contamination of Their Groundwater,” paper presented at Society for Applied Anthropology, Washington, D.C.
Fitchen, Janet M., Jenifer S. Heath, and June Fessenden-Raden, forthcoming, “Risk Perception in Community Context: A Case Study,” to be published in a volume entitled The Social Construction of Risk edited by Branden Johnson and Vincent Covello.
Fowlkes, Martha R. and Patricia Y. Miller, 1982, Love Canal: The Social Construction of Disaster, Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Lemley, A.T., J. Fessenden-Raden, C.A. Bisogni, and J.M. Holway, 1985, “Nitrate Contamination: Public Awareness,” J. Amer. Water Works, 77: 34–39.
Rayner, Steve, 1984, “A Cultural Analysis of Occupational Risk Perception,” Royal Anthropological Institute Newsletter, 60: 10–12.
Rayner, Steve, 1985, “Predicting Social Acceptance of Future Technologies: Advanced Concepts for Nuclear Reactors,” lecture presented at Cornell University, 2/7/85.
Schwartz, Steven P., Paul E. White, and Robert G. Hughes, 1985, “Environmental Threats, Communities, and Hysteria,” Journal of Public Health Policy, 6: 58–77.
Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischoff, and Sara Lichtenstein, 1979, Rating the Risks,“ Environment, 21: 14–39.
Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischoff, and Sara Lichtenstein, 1980, “Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk.” in R. C. Schwing and W.A. Albers, eds. Social Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? New York: Plenum Press, 181–214.
Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischoff, and Sara Lichtenstein, 1984, “Behavioral Decision Theory Perspectives on risk and Safety,” Acta Psychologica, 56: 183–203.
Starr, Chauncey, 1985, “Risk Management, Assessment, and Acceptability,” Risk Analysis, 5: 97–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fitchen, J.M. (1987). The Importance of Community Context in Effective Risk Management. In: Lave, L.B. (eds) Risk Assessment and Management. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6443-7_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6443-7_65
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6445-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6443-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive