Abstract
Recent efforts by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to negotiate an agreement on a revised standard for occupational exposure to benzene represented an important initiative by the Agency. Increasingly, the Government is seeking more efficient and effective ways to establish health and environmental standards, and negotiation is a promising alternative for promoting this goal. While use of negotiation in rulemaking proceedings is new, negotiation has been common in other contexts for many years. It is important, however, not to assume that the lessons learned in these other contexts can be applied automatically to rulemaking negotiations. The paper discusses some of the most significant distinctions among the different contexts in which negotiation occurs.
This paper expresses only the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the position of the American Petroleum Institute or any of its members.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Swanson, S.M., DeLong, J.V. (1987). Regulatory Negotiation: Lessons from Benzene . In: Lave, L.B. (eds) Risk Assessment and Management. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6443-7_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6443-7_58
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6445-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6443-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive