Skip to main content

Abstract

An image is a reproduction of a person or a thing, and image formation is the reproduction process. Thus, images are representations of objects, which are sensed through their radiant energy, e.g., light. Therefore, by its definition, image formation requires a radiant source,an object, and a formation system. Radiant sources can be of various kinds (e.g., white light sources, laser systems, X-ray tubes, thermal sources, even acoustic wave sources). Therefore, the physics of image formation can vary accordingly. The nature of the radiation also greatly influences the structure of the formation system. There exist formation systems which are biological (e.g., the vision system of the human and the animals), photochemical (e.g., photographic cameras) or photoelectronic (e.g., TV cameras). Thus it is very difficult to build an image formation model that can encompass this enormous variety of radiation sources and image formation systems. The model described in Figure 3.1.1 is quite general and can be used in various digital image processing and computer vision applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.D. Levine, Vision in man and machine, McGraw Hill, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H.0 Andrews, B.R. Hunt, Digital image restoration, Prentice-Hall, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Foley, A. Van Dam, Fundamentals of interactive computer graphics, Addison-Wesley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. E. Jenkins, Optical sensing techniques and signal processing, Prentice-Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.F. Barbe, “Imaging devices using the charge coupled concept”, Proceeding of the IEEE, vol. 63, pp. 38–67, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C.E.K. Mees, The theory of the photographic process, McMillan Company, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.G. Falconer, “Image enhancement and film-grain noise”, Optica Acta, vol. 17, pp. 693–705, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.E. Dudgeon, R.M. Mersereau, Multidimensional digital signal processing, Prentice-Hall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.K. Pratt, Digital image processing, J. Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Westheimer, F.W. Campel, “Light distribution in the image formed by the living human eye”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 52, No. 9, pp. 1040–1045, 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Wizecki, W.S. Stiles, Color science, concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulas, Wiley, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W.F. Schreiber, “Image processing for quality improvement”, Proc. of IEEE, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 1640–1651, Dec. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.L. Mannos, D. Sacrison, “The effects of the visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-20, pp. 525–536, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.F. Hall, E.L. Hall, “A nonlinear model for the spatial characteristics of the human visual system”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-7, no. 3, pp. 161–170, March 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Metzler (editor), Systems neuroscience, Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.G. Stockham Jr., “Image processing in the context of a visual model”, Proc. of IEEE, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 828–842, July 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C.F Hall, “Subjective evaluation of a perceptual quality metric”, Image Quality, Proc. Soc. Photo Opt. Instr. Eng., vol. 310, pp. 200–204, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Marmolin, “Subjective MSE measures”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Machine and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-16, no. 3, pp. 486–489, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Mandel, “Fluctuations of photon beams, the distribution of the photoelectrons”, Proc. Phys. Soc. of London, vol. 74, pp. 233–243, 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.F. Hall, “The application of human visual system models to digital color image compression”, Proc. IEEE Int. Comm. Conf., pp. 436–441, Boston, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B.R. Hunt, “Digital image processing”, Proc. IEEE, vol. 63. no. 4, pp. 693–708, April 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Papoulis, Probability, random variables and stochastic processes, McGraw-Hill, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pitas, I., Venetsanopoulos, A.N. (1990). Image Formation. In: Nonlinear Digital Filters. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 84. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6017-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6017-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5120-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6017-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics