Abstract
Predator-prey interactions have been among the most intensively studied areas of aquatic biology during the past several decades. Investigations have focused particularly on theories of “optimal foraging,” which seeks to describe predator behavior [e.g., Charnov (1976), Werner and Hall (1974), and Pyke (1984)], and “predator mediated community structure” (Hrbacek, 1962; Brooks and Dodson, 1965; Hall et al., 1976; Zaret, 1980; Werner and Gilliam, 1984; Sih et al., 1985; Kerfoot and Sih, 1987; Lampert and Sommer, 1997), which interprets community structure in relation to predatory activities. Many of these hypotheses still are speculative, although supporting evidence for some is growing. These concepts form a useful basis for the study of predator-prey relationships. The literature on this subject is extremely large; a few summary articles relative to limnology are cited in this exercise.
In evaluating predator-prey interactions, both the predators and prey have physiological and behavioral characteristics that must be considered. Major predator characteristics that can be evaluated include: (1) visual, mechanical, or chemical detection of prey; (2) how much energy is required during searching for and attacking prey; and (3) energy and time expended in handling, and total or partial consumption of prey. Evaluation of the ways in which prey respond to predation requires considerations of: (1) behavior and energy expended in escape responses, often by refuge in space and/or time; and (2) means by which prey adapt and coexist with predators. The latter coexistence can be accomplished by camouflage, differences in size, release of repulsive chemical compounds, frightening displays, evasive movements, morphological structures that impede or prevent consumption, and aggregation in large groups.
Predators and prey respond continuously to each other’s adaptations, which results in constant, although slow, coevolution and changing interactions. The extent of interactive couplings can be evaluated by exposing prey to predators under controlled experimental conditions [e.g., Thompson (1978) and Werner (1974)] or by the introduction of new predators or prey into established ecosystems [e.g., Langeland (1981) and Morgan et al. (1978)]. The latter approach should not be done without considerable forethought and understanding of ecosystem properties. The former experimental approach will be used in this exercise to gain insight into some basic predator-prey interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arts, M.T., E.J. Maly, and M. Pasitschniak. 1981. The influence of Acilius (Dytiscidae) prédation on Daphnia in a small pond. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26:1172–1175.
Brooks, J.L. 1968. The effects of prey size selection by lake planktivores. Syst. Zool. 17:273–291.
Brooks, J.L. and S.I. Dodson. 1965. Prédation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35.
Charnov, E.L. 1976. Optimal foraging theory: The marginal value theorem. Theor. Pop. Biol. 9:129–136.
Clepper, H. and R.H. Stroud, (eds). 1979. Predator-Prey Systems in Fisheries Management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, DC.
Dodson, S.I. 1975. Predation rates of Zooplankton in arctic ponds. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20:426–433.
Hall, J.D., S.T Threlkeld, C.W. Burns, and PH. Crowley. 1976. The size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of Zooplankton communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7:177–208.
Hassell, M.P 1977. Sigmoid functional responses by invertebrate predators and parasitoids. J. Anim. Ecol. 46:249–262.
Holling C.S. 1965a. The functional response of predators to prey density, and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 45:1–60.
Holling, C.S. 1965b. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 48:1–86.
Hrbacek, J. 1962. Species composition and the amount of the Zooplankton in relation to the fish stock. Rozpravy Ceskosl. Akad. Ved. Rada Matem. Prir. Ved. 72:1–114.
Iwasa, Y., et al. 1981. Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Amer. Nat. 117:710–723.
Jacobs, J. 1965. Significance of morphology and physiology of Daphnia for its survival in predator-prey experiments. Naturwissenschaften 52:141.
Kerfoot, W.C. and A. Sih (eds.) 1987. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 386pp.
Lampert, W. and U. Sommer. 1997. Limnoecology: The Ecology of Lakes and Streams. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. 382 pp.
Langeland, A. 1981. Decreased Zooplankton density in two Norwegian lakes caused by predation of recently introduced My sis relicta. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 21:926–937.
Morgan, M.D., S. T. Threlked, and C.R. Goldman. 1978. Impact of the introduction of Kokanee (Oncorphynchus nerka) and the oppossum shrimp (Mysis relicta) on a subalpine lake. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 35:1572–1579.
Murdoch, W.W. 1973. The functional response of predators. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:335–342.
Pyke, G.H. 1984. Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:523–575.
Oaten, A. and W.W. Murdoch. 1975. Switching, functional response and stability in predator-prey systems. Amer. Nat. 109:299–318.
Schoener, T.W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:369–404.
Sih, A., P. Crowley, M. McPeek, J. Petranka, and K. Strohmeier. 1985. Predation, competition, and prey communities: A review of field experiments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:269–311.
Taylor, R.J. 1981. Ambush predation as a destabilizing influence upon prey populations. Amer. Nat. 118:102–109.
Thompson, D.J. 1978. Towards a realistic predator-prey model: The effects of temperature on the functional response and life history of larvae of the damselfy Ishnura elegans. J. Anim. Ecol. 47:151–167.
Werner, E.E. 1974. The fish size, prey size handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications. J Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31:1531–1536.
Werner, E.E. and D.J. Hall. 1974. Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052.
Werner, E.E. and J.F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:393–125.
Zaret, T.M. 1980. Prédation and Freshwater Communities. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wetzel, R.G., Likens, G.E. (2000). Predator-Prey Interactions. In: Limnological Analyses. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3250-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3250-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3186-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3250-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive