Skip to main content

Predator-Prey Interactions

  • Chapter
Limnological Analyses

Abstract

Predator-prey interactions have been among the most intensively studied areas of aquatic biology during the past several decades. Investigations have focused particularly on theories of “optimal foraging,” which seeks to describe predator behavior [e.g., Charnov (1976), Werner and Hall (1974), and Pyke (1984)], and “predator mediated community structure” (Hrbacek, 1962; Brooks and Dodson, 1965; Hall et al., 1976; Zaret, 1980; Werner and Gilliam, 1984; Sih et al., 1985; Kerfoot and Sih, 1987; Lampert and Sommer, 1997), which interprets community structure in relation to predatory activities. Many of these hypotheses still are speculative, although supporting evidence for some is growing. These concepts form a useful basis for the study of predator-prey relationships. The literature on this subject is extremely large; a few summary articles relative to limnology are cited in this exercise.

In evaluating predator-prey interactions, both the predators and prey have physiological and behavioral characteristics that must be considered. Major predator characteristics that can be evaluated include: (1) visual, mechanical, or chemical detection of prey; (2) how much energy is required during searching for and attacking prey; and (3) energy and time expended in handling, and total or partial consumption of prey. Evaluation of the ways in which prey respond to predation requires considerations of: (1) behavior and energy expended in escape responses, often by refuge in space and/or time; and (2) means by which prey adapt and coexist with predators. The latter coexistence can be accomplished by camouflage, differences in size, release of repulsive chemical compounds, frightening displays, evasive movements, morphological structures that impede or prevent consumption, and aggregation in large groups.

Predators and prey respond continuously to each other’s adaptations, which results in constant, although slow, coevolution and changing interactions. The extent of interactive couplings can be evaluated by exposing prey to predators under controlled experimental conditions [e.g., Thompson (1978) and Werner (1974)] or by the introduction of new predators or prey into established ecosystems [e.g., Langeland (1981) and Morgan et al. (1978)]. The latter approach should not be done without considerable forethought and understanding of ecosystem properties. The former experimental approach will be used in this exercise to gain insight into some basic predator-prey interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arts, M.T., E.J. Maly, and M. Pasitschniak. 1981. The influence of Acilius (Dytiscidae) prédation on Daphnia in a small pond. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26:1172–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J.L. 1968. The effects of prey size selection by lake planktivores. Syst. Zool. 17:273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J.L. and S.I. Dodson. 1965. Prédation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E.L. 1976. Optimal foraging theory: The marginal value theorem. Theor. Pop. Biol. 9:129–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clepper, H. and R.H. Stroud, (eds). 1979. Predator-Prey Systems in Fisheries Management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, S.I. 1975. Predation rates of Zooplankton in arctic ponds. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20:426–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.D., S.T Threlkeld, C.W. Burns, and PH. Crowley. 1976. The size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of Zooplankton communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7:177–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P 1977. Sigmoid functional responses by invertebrate predators and parasitoids. J. Anim. Ecol. 46:249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling C.S. 1965a. The functional response of predators to prey density, and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 45:1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 1965b. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 48:1–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrbacek, J. 1962. Species composition and the amount of the Zooplankton in relation to the fish stock. Rozpravy Ceskosl. Akad. Ved. Rada Matem. Prir. Ved. 72:1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, Y., et al. 1981. Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Amer. Nat. 117:710–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1965. Significance of morphology and physiology of Daphnia for its survival in predator-prey experiments. Naturwissenschaften 52:141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W.C. and A. Sih (eds.) 1987. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 386pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, W. and U. Sommer. 1997. Limnoecology: The Ecology of Lakes and Streams. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. 382 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeland, A. 1981. Decreased Zooplankton density in two Norwegian lakes caused by predation of recently introduced My sis relicta. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 21:926–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.D., S. T. Threlked, and C.R. Goldman. 1978. Impact of the introduction of Kokanee (Oncorphynchus nerka) and the oppossum shrimp (Mysis relicta) on a subalpine lake. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 35:1572–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W.W. 1973. The functional response of predators. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G.H. 1984. Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:523–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaten, A. and W.W. Murdoch. 1975. Switching, functional response and stability in predator-prey systems. Amer. Nat. 109:299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:369–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A., P. Crowley, M. McPeek, J. Petranka, and K. Strohmeier. 1985. Predation, competition, and prey communities: A review of field experiments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:269–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R.J. 1981. Ambush predation as a destabilizing influence upon prey populations. Amer. Nat. 118:102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.J. 1978. Towards a realistic predator-prey model: The effects of temperature on the functional response and life history of larvae of the damselfy Ishnura elegans. J. Anim. Ecol. 47:151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. 1974. The fish size, prey size handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications. J Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31:1531–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. and D.J. Hall. 1974. Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. and J.F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:393–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T.M. 1980. Prédation and Freshwater Communities. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wetzel, R.G., Likens, G.E. (2000). Predator-Prey Interactions. In: Limnological Analyses. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3250-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3250-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3186-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3250-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics