Skip to main content

Productivity and Specificity in Factor Inputs

  • Chapter
Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth

Abstract

This paper considers the effect on productivity growth of the wage moderation policy embarked upon in the Netherlands starting in 1982. The paper describes how the effect depends on the macroeconomic importance of the hold-up problem that results from specificity in factor markets. The analysis is based on a vintage model of capital with embodied technology. In a traditional vintage model, a decline in wages relative to cost of capital will delay scrapping and postpone new investment, thus reducing productivity growth in the medium term. In a recent version of the vintage model, where the specific production relationship between capital and labour gives rise to problems associated with appropriability of rents, institutionalised wage moderation will increase new investment and improve productivity. A preliminary analysis of micro-level data of industrial firms does not yet lead one to reject the important role of specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbring, J.H. and P.A. Gautier (1997), “Gross Job Flow in Netherlands Manufacturing: A Panel Data Analysis,” mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman, E. J. and M. E. Doms (2000), “Understanding Productivity: Lesson from Longitudinal Microdata, ”Journal of Economic Literature,forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman, E.J., G. van Leeuwen and H. Nieuwenhuijsen (1998), “Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technology in the Netherlands,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 6, pp. 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, L. A. (1997), “Dutch Employment Growth: An Analysis,” CPB-report 2 (2), 1624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broer, D.P. (1996) On The Theory of Investment in Vintage Capital Models, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 96–92/4, Tinbergen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J. (1997), “Aggregate Investment, A 90’s View,” May, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J. and M.L. Hammour (1996), “The Macroeconomics of Specificity”, NBER Working Paper Series 5757, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J., E.M. Engel and J.C. Haltiwanger (1995), “Plant-level Adjustment and Aggregate Investment Dynamics,” in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Washington, D.C., pp. 1350–1368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R, J. Haltiwanger and L. Power (1994), “Machine Replacement and the Business Cycle: Lumps and Bumps,” mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPB (1992), FKSEC: A Macro-econometric Model of the Netherlands, Nijmegen: Stenfert Kroese.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPB (1997), Challenging Neighbours, Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., J. Haltiwanger and S. Schuh (1996), Job Creation and Job Destruction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doms, M. E. (1993), “Inter Fuel Substitution and Energy Technology Heterogeneity in U.A. Manufacturing,”discussion paper CES 93–5, U.S. Bureau of Census, Center for Economic Studies, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T. and M. Doms (1993), “An Investigation into Capital and Labour Adjustment at the Plant Level,” mimeo, Center for Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., M. Roberts and L. Samuelson (1988), “Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries,” RAND Journal of Economics 19, pp. 495–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R. (1994), “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries,” American Economic Review 84, pp. 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D., F. Gollop and B. Fraumeni (1987), Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A.H. (1994), “Heeft Nederland een loongolf nodig?,” Economisch Statistische Berichten, January, pp. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, C., (1997), “NEMO: CPB’s new energy model,” CPB-report, vol. 2 (2), pp. 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcomson, J.M. (1997), “Contracts, Hold-up and Labour Markets,” Journal of Economic Literature 35, pp. 1916–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuckin, R.H. (1995), “Establishment Microdata for Economic Research and Policy Analysis: Looking beyond the Aggregates,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13, pp. 121–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartelsman, E.J. (2000). Productivity and Specificity in Factor Inputs. In: van Ark, B., Kuipers, S.K., Kuper, G.H. (eds) Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3161-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3161-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5003-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3161-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics